Amid all the Obamacare extensions and fixes, there is one thing the White House can’t change — state decisions on Medicaid expansion.
That’s where it’s up to residents to take action, President Obama said in an interview with WebMD posted Friday. The president answered questions from the online community to promote the Affordable Care Act ahead of the March 31 enrollment deadline.
“We don’t have the ability at the federal level to pressure these states to do what they should be doing,” Obama said. “Hopefully, citizens in those states, as they look at neighboring states that are expanding Medicaid, will say: ‘Well, why would you — Mr. Governor, or members of the state legislature — choose deliberately to leave people in our state uninsured, particularly when it doesn’t cost our state any money?’ “
Under the ACA, Medicaid is extended to all individuals at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty level. The federal government will cover the 100 percent of the cost for the first three years, until 2016. After that, the federal contribution decreases to 90 percent by 2020, where it will remain.
Currently, 25 states plus the District of Columbia are moving forward with Medicaid expansion, 19 are not, and six are still deliberating. Those that have opted out are all Republican-run states.
“This is a source of great frustration for me,” Obama continued. “For political reasons, a number of states have chosen not to take us up on that, and the Supreme Court said we could not condition other programs, like existing Medicaid programs, on them accepting it.”
The Court ruled in 2012 to leave the decision up to the state governments. States can change their mind and decide to opt in to Medicaid expansion at any point.
That change, however, is dependent on state residents pressuring their representatives to join the program.
“We’ve seen some states where Republican governors have said, ‘You know, this is the right thing to do,’ even if they don’t agree with the president,” Obama said. “And they’ve gone ahead and done it and people have benefited from it. And I hope that ends up being true in all 50 states; right now it’s not true in a number of states, including some big states like Texas, where a lot of people are being impacted.”
Watch the full interview at WebMD.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.