A long-term fix for Medicare’s physicians’ pay problem got the House’s stamp of approval Friday, but the bill is going nowhere because it also delays Obamacare’s individual mandate.
The House passed, 238-181, the measure that would repeal and replace the flawed SGR formula that institutes annual payment cuts to doctors who provide services to Medicare beneficiaries.
But the cost of the bill is offset by a five-year delay of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, and the White House has already issued a statement that the president would veto it if it arrives on his desk.
Without the individual mandate, fewer Americans would sign up for Medicaid or private insurance on the health law’s exchanges. In total, 13 million people would forgo insurance, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates, resulting in lower federal expenditures on the Medicaid program and the premium tax credits designed to make private coverage more affordable.
“There is no reason for the House Republicans to put the doctor community through this charade again,” said Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., in an impassioned floor speech. “We had, in fact, been making remarkable progress on a bipartisan solution. Instead the Republicans have hijacked those negotiations and made it so bad that even the American Medical Association rejects it.”
In a letter to Congress earlier this week, the powerful doctors’ lobby expressed “profound disappointment that a strong bipartisan, bicameral effort to repeal the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR) has become a victim of partisan approaches to resolve budgetary issues.”
Friday’s vote comes after negotiations on a realistic pay-for have stalled movement on the bill. Republicans argued on the floor that Democrats had no other suggestion about how to pay for the fix.
“We have at the end of the month a cliff where our providers under Medicare are looking at a 24 percent cut,” said Rep. Tom Reed, R-N.Y. “The other side is engaging in political theatre. The other side “¦ believes that we should continue to do what we do in Washington and pass policy without paying for it.”
Congress has until March 31 to come to an agreement — or pass another temporary “doc fix” — to avert an automatic cut to doctors’ pay.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."