Taxing soda and other sugar-rich drinks—a measure lawmakers and voters have weighed to combat the nation’s growing obesity epidemic—would have no negative effect on jobs, a study finds.
Researchers at the University of Illinois (Chicago) found that a 20 percent increase on the price of sugar-sweetened beverages would have an overall positive impact on the labor market.
The American Beverage Association has long pushed back against such a tariff on the price of soda, arguing that the decreased demand for the drinks would cause job losses in the industry. But the new study evaluates the overall job market, including the effect on jobs in the non-sugary-drink sector as well as the added positions in state and local governments that result from the new revenue. The study finds that the employment gains in other sectors of the economy far outweigh the job losses for soda makers.
“People who don’t spend a dollar on a sugar-sweetened beverage still have that dollar to spend elsewhere,” said Lisa Powell, the study’s primary author and a professor at UIC.
That dollar could go to support the fruit-juice industry and the milk and dairy industry, or it could go back to the bank. But that dollar is still a dollar to be spent, along with the added revenue from the sugar-sweetened beverage tax, a factor that was not taken into account by studies released by the American Beverage Association, Powell said. While soda makers may face job losses, perhaps a truck driver begins to transport milk due to the new increased demand from the soda tax, she said.
When asked for a comment, ABA reiterated its original findings about job losses in the beverage industry, and added that taxes on sugary drinks have not garnered the support of voters nationwide.
“Americans have made it clear they don’t support taxes and other restrictions on common grocery items, like soft drinks,” said ABA spokesman Chris Gindlesperger in an email. “Soda taxes have unintended consequences on middle-class jobs and small businesses. For these and other reasons, tax proposals continue to fail wherever they are introduced.”
The UIC researchers looked at Illinois—their home state—and California to study the effects of soda taxes on the labor market. California is one state where voters have considered but defeated soda-tax ballot measures, and San Francisco is considering another tax measure again this fall. The researchers found an increase of 4,509 jobs in Illinois and 6,252 jobs in California.
The study was conducted independently through a grant from the Healthy Eating Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which is a philanthropic organization devoted to improving public health.
“It’s important for health; it is a substantial amount of money, and it looks like it would not hurt jobs and may even modestly help,” said Jim Marks, senior vice president at RWJF. “The question is, will in any jurisdiction, will the leaders and the public support such a tax in a way so that it can implemented and see its effects in the real world?”
While sugar-sweetened beverages have been linked with obesity, diabetes, and other health problems, ABA also says its members are not directly responsible for the nation’s obesity epidemic. Obesity has been on the climb while the sugar content of drinks has fallen. Despite the debate around the overall public health effect, numerous soda-tax measures around the country include provisions to spend a portion of the revenue on childhood wellness and anti-obesity programs.
What We're Following See More »
"Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has appointed a veteran legal insider with strong personal ties to the Obama administration to serve as his special adviser focused exclusively on fixing the Washington region’s troubled Metro system. Kathryn Thomson, who was expected to leave her job as the Department of Transportation’s top lawyer, instead will stay on as Foxx’s special adviser on Metro oversight." She'll start this week.
While Donald Trump's poll numbers are steadily climbing, he "trails far behind" Hillary Clinton "in organizing in key general-election states. Ohio ... presents both ... Trump's best opportunity to carry a big swing state and reveals his team's steep logistical challenges. After winning the GOP nomination on a tight budget with a skeletal staff ... Trump doesn't have any general-election staff in the state, and senior aides in New York and Washington haven't made contact with the state Republican Party. Efforts to recruit the state's experienced operatives who helped elect" John Kasich "have so far been unsuccessful, people familiar with the matter said." Clinton "has a small team of full-time aides in Ohio."
One of the last high-profile holdouts against Donald Trump appears to have finally come around. "Graham urged GOP donors at a private fundraiser Saturday in Florida to unite behind Trump's campaign and stressed the importance of keeping likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton from the White House. The fundraiser was hosted by former U.S. Ambassador to Portugal Al Hoffman, a former Republican National Committee finance chairman who also co-chaired Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential bid."
Two new national polls released this weekend show Donald Trump running neck and neck with Hillary Clinton. First up: an NBC/Wall Street Journal survey shows a three-point lead for Clinton, 46%-43%. She led by 11 percentage points in April. Next is an ABC News/Washington Post poll actually shows Donald Trump ahead, 46%-44%. "Greater voter registration among Republicans is one factor: Clinton’s 6-point lead among all adults, 48-42 percent in a general election matchup, switches to essentially a dead heat among registered voters."