Congress Braves First Steps in Medicare Reform

Seniors beware: Congress is considering changes to what Medicare will pay for, and what’s coming out of your pocket.

Retirees in front of their home
National Journal
Clara Ritger
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Jan. 20, 2014, 3:36 a.m.

Con­gress is get­ting ser­i­ous about changes to Medi­care, even if that means cut­ting cov­er­age to ser­vices that seni­or cit­izens have long en­joyed.

At is­sue are what’s known as Medi­care “ex­tenders,” tacked-on money that Con­gress has to ap­prove an­nu­ally to fund the pro­gram’s cov­er­age for be­ne­fi­ciar­ies with chron­ic and de­bil­it­at­ing con­di­tions. In past years, Con­gress has passed a blanket ex­ten­sion of the pay­ments, which in­clude such things as fund­ing for rur­al and low-volume hos­pit­als, am­bu­lance rides, spe­cial­ized care for needy pa­tients, and out­pa­tient ther­apy.

But this time around — after tril­lions in debt and hav­ing vowed to root out waste — Con­gress is at­tempt­ing to be choo­si­er, look­ing to move cer­tain ex­penses off of the fed­er­al books. Cur­rently, le­gis­lat­ors are mulling two dif­fer­ent plans: one from the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee and the oth­er from the Medi­care Pay­ment Ad­vis­ory Com­mis­sion (Med­PAC), the in­de­pend­ent con­gres­sion­al ad­vis­ory board es­tab­lished in 1997 to ad­vise Con­gress on Medi­care policy.

And as they make their de­cisions, law­makers will be de­cid­ing what ser­vices seni­ors’ still get their gov­ern­ment plan to cov­er, and which ones they will have to find fund­ing for else­where. Here are a few ser­vices on Medi­care’s chop­ping block.

Rur­al Hos­pit­als

Un­der the cur­rent sys­tem: Con­gress votes each year to grant ad­di­tion­al pay­ments to hos­pit­als in rur­al areas that see a low num­ber of pa­tients, in or­der to guar­an­tee ac­cess for be­ne­fi­ciar­ies in the event that a hos­pit­al can’t af­ford to stay in busi­ness.

Un­der Sen­ate Fin­ance: The cur­rent situ­ation would re­main in place.

Un­der Med­PAC: Med­PAC does not make a spe­cif­ic re­com­mend­a­tion, but it notes that tax­pay­ers may be fund­ing more hos­pit­als than they need to, be­cause the pay­ments can go to sup­port two com­pet­ing low-volume hos­pit­als in rur­al areas, where pa­tients would only need one to guar­an­tee ac­cess to care.

Am­bu­lances

Un­der the cur­rent sys­tem: Each year Con­gress votes to pay ex­tra for am­bu­lances, trans­port­a­tion in rur­al areas, and care flights.

Un­der Sen­ate Fin­ance: Ground and su­per rur­al trans­port get ex­tra pay­ments un­til Jan. 1, 2019, when the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment will de­cide wheth­er they’re ne­ces­sary.

Un­der Med­PAC: Med­PAC re­com­mends let­ting the add-on pay­ments ex­pire, which they would do auto­mat­ic­ally at the end of March un­less Con­gress acts. Med­PAC says the pay­ments are un­ne­ces­sary. In their data ana­lys­is from 2007 to 2011, Med­PAC found a rap­id in­crease in Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies’ use of am­bu­lat­ory ser­vices for none­mer­gency pur­poses — for ex­ample, to dia­lys­is ap­point­ments — as well as growth in none­mer­gency am­bu­lat­ory ser­vices provided by a small num­ber of for-profit sup­pli­ers and private-equity firms en­ter­ing the mar­ket, sug­gest­ing “that profit op­por­tun­it­ies in the in­dustry have been avail­able,” ac­cord­ing to Med­PAC Chair­man Glenn Hack­barth’s writ­ten testi­mony to the House En­ergy and Com­merce Sub­com­mit­tee on Health.

Spe­cial Needs Plans

Un­der the cur­rent sys­tem: Medi­care of­fers spe­cial­ized cov­er­age to be­ne­fi­ciar­ies liv­ing in nurs­ing homes, be­ne­fi­ciar­ies with chron­ic con­di­tions, such as end stage ren­al dis­ease or HIV/AIDS, and be­ne­fi­ciar­ies who are also eli­gible for Medi­caid. The cov­er­age helps co­ordin­ate care for be­ne­fi­ciar­ies who need a wide vari­ety of ser­vices.

Un­der Sen­ate Fin­ance: Sen­ate Fin­ance is pro­pos­ing phas­ing out all of these types of plans, ex­cept the ones for be­ne­fi­ciar­ies liv­ing in nurs­ing homes.

Un­der Med­PAC: Med­PAC says some of those plans — such as the ones for HIV/AIDS pa­tients — pro­duce pos­it­ive health out­comes and should re­main in ef­fect. Without the SN­Ps, be­ne­fi­ciar­ies would be rolled in­to Medi­care Ad­vant­age plans.

Out­pa­tient Ther­apy

Un­der the cur­rent sys­tem: Medi­care pay­ments for out­pa­tient ther­apy is capped, with those who qual­i­fy for the ex­cep­tions pro­cess sub­ject to a claims re­view be­fore Medi­care will re­im­burse. The pro­cess has caused some pro­viders — in­clud­ing long term care fa­cil­it­ies and nurs­ing homes — to con­tin­ue provid­ing treat­ment, only to find out that Medi­care will not be pay­ing them back.

Un­der Sen­ate Fin­ance: Sen­ate Fin­ance wants to do away with the caps al­to­geth­er, al­low­ing HHS to de­term­ine which spe­cif­ic pro­ced­ures or con­di­tions will re­quire auto­mat­ic claims re­views. Pro­viders would have to ob­tain pr­eau­thor­iz­a­tion, mean­ing they could not provide treat­ment un­til the claim is re­viewed.

Un­der Med­PAC: Med­PAC wants to keep the caps and re­duce them, to lim­it un­ne­ces­sary spend­ing by some be­ne­fi­ciar­ies and in­crease over­sight on oth­ers who seek a lot of ther­apy.

And All of It While Ra­cing the Clock

As Con­gress mulls changes, it will have to do it on a dead­line — pay­ments for most of the pro­grams are set to ex­pire March 31.

But how quickly Con­gress will come to an agree­ment be­fore that dead­line is un­clear.

Montana Demo­crat Max Baucus, chair­man of the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee, has said he’d like to see it done be­fore he as­sumes his new role as am­bas­sad­or to China, ac­cord­ing to Ju­li­us Hob­son, a lob­by­ist at Polsinelli Shughart who rep­res­ents phys­i­cian groups and long-term-care fa­cil­it­ies and a former dir­ect­or of con­gres­sion­al af­fairs at the Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al As­so­ci­ation. Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., said at a fun­drais­ing event that his goal is to have Baucus’s con­firm­a­tion com­pleted by mid-Feb­ru­ary, Hob­son said, and get­ting the whole “doc-fix” pack­age ready by mid-Feb­ru­ary “is a tall, tall or­der.”

While the Sen­ate Fin­ance pro­pos­al is ready for floor ac­tion, both the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee and the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee are work­ing out the ex­tenders policies and the pay-fors on their re­spect­ive ver­sions of the per­man­ent “doc fix.” A spokes­man for the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee said the three are in on­go­ing ne­go­ti­ations about the pro­pos­als, and a spokes­wo­man for the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee said they are re­view­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions from Sen­ate Fin­ance, Med­PAC, and key stake­hold­ers — such as long-term-care fa­cil­it­ies and nurs­ing homes — in their work.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×