You’re Probably Paying Too Much for Your Health Insurance “¦ and It’s Your Fault

New research suggests consumers continually pick more expensive plans than they need.

MIAMI, FL - DECEMBER 23: Certified Enrollment Specialist, Julienne Fontes, (R) helps Elva Garcia (L) and Jorge Codevila through the options available to them under the Affordable Care Act at a Miami Enrollment Assistance Center on December 23, 2013 in Miami, Florida. In a symbolic gesture ,U.S. President Obama signed up in the federal health care insurance. The goverment announced today that people will have a grace period exending into tomorow to enroll for a plan that would start January 1st. 
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Dec. 24, 2013, midnight

Health in­sur­ance shop­pers do a ter­rible job of pick­ing the plan that will serve them best, ac­cord­ing to a new study.

The study presen­ted sub­jects with health in­sur­ance web­sites that mir­ror the ex­changes set up by the Af­ford­able Care Act and asked them to pick a plan. The res­ults were not pretty: Left to their own devices, con­sumers who se­lec­ted their own plans ended up only slightly bet­ter off than they would have had their plans been as­signed ran­domly.

When giv­en four op­tions, the con­sumers chose the most cost-ef­fect­ive plan only 42 per­cent of the time. When giv­en eight op­tions, the suc­cess rate plummeted to 21 per­cent — a rate in­dis­tin­guish­able from ran­dom as­sign­ments.

The re­search­ers then re­peated the study, but this time with ad­ded “cost cal­cu­lat­ors” on the mock web­site aimed at help­ing con­sumers. Even then, shop­pers picked the most cost-ef­fect­ive op­tion only 47 per­cent of the time, typ­ic­ally choos­ing plans that would cost them an ex­tra $364.

In a fi­nal it­er­a­tion, re­search­ers offered the shop­ping choices to M.B.A. stu­dents en­rolled in a con­sumer fin­ance class. In this pool — where more than half of the sub­jects came from con­sult­ing or fin­an­cial-ser­vices re­lated fields — con­sumers made the most cost-ef­fect­ive choice 73 per­cent of the time, and the av­er­age mis­take dropped to $126.

Doubts about shop­pers’ abil­ity rep­res­ent a chal­lenge for Obama­care, which is aimed at curb­ing the coun­try’s ex­pand­ing health costs while al­low­ing con­sumers to pick their own plans on the on­line ex­changes.

“If con­sumers can’t identi­fy the most cost-ef­fi­cient plan for their needs, the ex­changes will fail to pro­duce com­pet­it­ive pres­sures on health care pro­viders and bring down costs across the board, one of the main ad­vant­ages of re­ly­ing upon choice and mar­kets,” said Eric John­son, a Columbia Uni­versity busi­ness school pro­fess­or who coau­thored the study.

But why did con­sumers fail to pick the prop­er plan?

The re­search­ers con­cluded that while the math is daunt­ing, the fact that the cost cal­cu­lat­ors did little to im­prove out­comes sug­gests there’s more to the prob­lem.

Con­sumers tend to over­weigh the im­port­ance of premi­ums and un­der­es­tim­ate the costs from de­duct­ibles and out-of-pock­et con­tri­bu­tions, the re­search­ers wrote. Low premi­um pay­ments are at­tract­ive, but for someone who uses a lot of health ser­vices, the high de­duct­ible that of­ten ac­com­pan­ies the low premi­um means the con­sumer will pay the full cost of care un­til he or she reaches the de­duct­ible, when in­sur­ance kicks in and starts to share a por­tion of those ex­penses.

The re­search­ers say the dam­age done by poor con­sumer choices can be at least partly off­set by well-de­signed ex­changes.

“The bad news: Con­sumers left to their own devices seem to make large er­rors when choos­ing health in­sur­ance, sug­gest­ing that they will se­lect op­tions that are not cost ef­fi­cient and they seem to be un­aware of their fail­ure,” they wrote. “The good news is that we have demon­strated that ex­change de­sign­ers can im­prove con­sumers’ per­form­ance markedly through the use of just-in-time edu­ca­tion, smart de­faults, and cost cal­cu­lat­ors.”

Spe­cific­ally, the re­search­ers urge the web­sites to sort plans by cost, to present “qual­ity cues,” or to lim­it the num­ber of choices presen­ted to plans that meet cer­tain cri­ter­ia of cost ef­fect­ive­ness.

Along with John­son, re­search­ers from Columbia’s psy­cho­logy de­part­ment, the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania, the Hebrew Uni­versity of Jer­u­s­alem, and the Uni­versity of Miami worked on the study.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×