You’re Probably Paying Too Much for Your Health Insurance “¦ and It’s Your Fault

New research suggests consumers continually pick more expensive plans than they need.

MIAMI, FL - DECEMBER 23: Certified Enrollment Specialist, Julienne Fontes, (R) helps Elva Garcia (L) and Jorge Codevila through the options available to them under the Affordable Care Act at a Miami Enrollment Assistance Center on December 23, 2013 in Miami, Florida. In a symbolic gesture ,U.S. President Obama signed up in the federal health care insurance. The goverment announced today that people will have a grace period exending into tomorow to enroll for a plan that would start January 1st. 
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Dec. 24, 2013, midnight

Health in­sur­ance shop­pers do a ter­rible job of pick­ing the plan that will serve them best, ac­cord­ing to a new study.

The study presen­ted sub­jects with health in­sur­ance web­sites that mir­ror the ex­changes set up by the Af­ford­able Care Act and asked them to pick a plan. The res­ults were not pretty: Left to their own devices, con­sumers who se­lec­ted their own plans ended up only slightly bet­ter off than they would have had their plans been as­signed ran­domly.

When giv­en four op­tions, the con­sumers chose the most cost-ef­fect­ive plan only 42 per­cent of the time. When giv­en eight op­tions, the suc­cess rate plummeted to 21 per­cent — a rate in­dis­tin­guish­able from ran­dom as­sign­ments.

The re­search­ers then re­peated the study, but this time with ad­ded “cost cal­cu­lat­ors” on the mock web­site aimed at help­ing con­sumers. Even then, shop­pers picked the most cost-ef­fect­ive op­tion only 47 per­cent of the time, typ­ic­ally choos­ing plans that would cost them an ex­tra $364.

In a fi­nal it­er­a­tion, re­search­ers offered the shop­ping choices to M.B.A. stu­dents en­rolled in a con­sumer fin­ance class. In this pool — where more than half of the sub­jects came from con­sult­ing or fin­an­cial-ser­vices re­lated fields — con­sumers made the most cost-ef­fect­ive choice 73 per­cent of the time, and the av­er­age mis­take dropped to $126.

Doubts about shop­pers’ abil­ity rep­res­ent a chal­lenge for Obama­care, which is aimed at curb­ing the coun­try’s ex­pand­ing health costs while al­low­ing con­sumers to pick their own plans on the on­line ex­changes.

“If con­sumers can’t identi­fy the most cost-ef­fi­cient plan for their needs, the ex­changes will fail to pro­duce com­pet­it­ive pres­sures on health care pro­viders and bring down costs across the board, one of the main ad­vant­ages of re­ly­ing upon choice and mar­kets,” said Eric John­son, a Columbia Uni­versity busi­ness school pro­fess­or who coau­thored the study.

But why did con­sumers fail to pick the prop­er plan?

The re­search­ers con­cluded that while the math is daunt­ing, the fact that the cost cal­cu­lat­ors did little to im­prove out­comes sug­gests there’s more to the prob­lem.

Con­sumers tend to over­weigh the im­port­ance of premi­ums and un­der­es­tim­ate the costs from de­duct­ibles and out-of-pock­et con­tri­bu­tions, the re­search­ers wrote. Low premi­um pay­ments are at­tract­ive, but for someone who uses a lot of health ser­vices, the high de­duct­ible that of­ten ac­com­pan­ies the low premi­um means the con­sumer will pay the full cost of care un­til he or she reaches the de­duct­ible, when in­sur­ance kicks in and starts to share a por­tion of those ex­penses.

The re­search­ers say the dam­age done by poor con­sumer choices can be at least partly off­set by well-de­signed ex­changes.

“The bad news: Con­sumers left to their own devices seem to make large er­rors when choos­ing health in­sur­ance, sug­gest­ing that they will se­lect op­tions that are not cost ef­fi­cient and they seem to be un­aware of their fail­ure,” they wrote. “The good news is that we have demon­strated that ex­change de­sign­ers can im­prove con­sumers’ per­form­ance markedly through the use of just-in-time edu­ca­tion, smart de­faults, and cost cal­cu­lat­ors.”

Spe­cific­ally, the re­search­ers urge the web­sites to sort plans by cost, to present “qual­ity cues,” or to lim­it the num­ber of choices presen­ted to plans that meet cer­tain cri­ter­ia of cost ef­fect­ive­ness.

Along with John­son, re­search­ers from Columbia’s psy­cho­logy de­part­ment, the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania, the Hebrew Uni­versity of Jer­u­s­alem, and the Uni­versity of Miami worked on the study.

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×