Family physicians have a message as Congress and state legislatures consider a range of policies that would squeeze doctors’ pay: People still want their doctor in charge.
There’s a shortage of primary-care doctors in the U.S., and demand is about to surge because of the coverage expansion in the Affordable Care Act. As a result, many states are considering measures that would let nurses and nurse practitioners take on more responsibility.
But the American Academy of Family Physicians says that’s not the answer—and that patients won’t like it, either. According to a new survey that AAFP commissioned, 72 percent of Americans say they want to see a doctor for their medical care, compared with just 7 percent who say they want to see a nurse practitioner.
AAFP’s survey says people rate nurse practitioners highly on attributes like being “comforting” and “a good listener,” but rate doctors higher on “who I want to see when I am sick.”
AAFP President Reid Blackwelder said it’s “very encouraging to have affirmation” of what primary-care doctors already believed—that they’re the ones people turn to and want to continue to turn to.
Nurse practitioners released their own competing poll last month, in which 62 percent of respondents said nurse practitioners should be able to provide certain services—such as writing prescriptions and ordering diagnostic tests—without supervision from a physician.
The battle between nurse practitioners and physicians is playing out ahead of a surge in demand for health care, with as many as 30 million people expected to come into the system through Obamacare. Primary care isn’t an especially lucrative specialty in the first place, and Blackwelder said residency opportunities for primary care will be in short supply in just a few years.
“The workforce issue is huge,” he said.
Instead of boosting nurse practitioners’ role, AAFP wants lawmakers to address the doctor shortage by funding more residency programs in primary care and increasing doctors’ payments under Medicare and Medicaid.
But those priorities are all waiting in line behind a permanent “doc fix,” Blackwelder said. He said Medicare’s payment formula for physicians is the single biggest threat to primary-care doctors. AAFP supported this year’s bipartisan, bicameral push to permanently replace the formula, which calls for payment cuts that Congress routinely delays. That effort didn’t make it across the finish line this year because lawmakers couldn’t agree on a way to pay for a permanent fix.
What We're Following See More »
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."
Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs."