It’s launch time — again — for the federally run insurance marketplaces at the heart of President Obama’s signature health care law.
The Health and Human Services Department has set this weekend as the deadline to fix HealthCare.gov, the primary enrollment website for Obamacare. Officials say the site will still have some glitches, but they’ll be more like true glitches, not the crippling front-to-back system failures that plagued the site’s initial launch.
HHS has had two months to fix the broken website, and the White House needs a dramatic improvement to stop the political bleeding it has suffered from the site and the uproar over canceled insurance policies.
So, how will we know if HealthCare.gov is working? Here are five important metrics to keep an eye on.
The administration vastly overstated how much of the site’s initial problems resulted from higher-than-expected traffic, but high volume was still an issue. In tests just before the site’s launch, it collapsed under a mere 2,000 simultaneous visitors — far short of the 4.7 million visits the site logged on its launch day.
Jeff Zients, the former White House budget director who is quarterbacking the HealthCare.gov repair effort, has said that by this weekend, the site will be able to handle 50,000 users at once, or about 800,000 per day. That’s where it was supposed to be at the time it launched. If the site can actually handle that many users without crashing, it’ll be a big improvement.
Zients has acknowledged that, at times, the site will have more than 50,000 users at once. He said HHS has replaced its old “please wait” message with a system that will e-mail users when traffic subsides and they can safely return.
Response times and error rates
HHS has heavily focused on these two improvements in its daily updates for the press. Zients said the error rate for consumers is below 1 percent and response times are under a secon — down from 8 seconds on Oct. 1. Especially because HHS has placed so much emphasis on these metrics, it’ll be important to see how well they hold up under increased traffic.
HealthCare.gov was still experiencing unexpected outages just a week before the administration’s end-of-November deadline. A few days earlier, it crashed while HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was trying to use it as part of an enrollment pitch. Unexpected outages have gotten more rare over the past two months, but they’re a much more visible problem than, say, slow response times.
Possibly the most serious technical problems with HealthCare.gov are among the least visible. Insurance companies have reported all sorts of problems with the information they receive about people who try to sign up for coverage. The enrollment reports — “834 transmissions,” in industry jargon — have been incomplete and inaccurate. Insurers would receive an enrollment, then a cancellation, then an enrollment, all for the same person, with no way to tell which was the most recent. Dependents have been misidentified as spouses. And insurers say they’re not confident these problems have been fully resolved despite Zients’s assurances that they were at the top of his “punch list” of repairs.
When hardly anyone can use HealthCare.gov, insurers can sort through the inconsistent information by hand. But now insurers are worried that HHS is about to flood them with more bad information than they can handle. And that could mean another round of problems as people who thought they were covered end up lost in the shuffle, or find out they have to pay more than they expected.
We won’t know official enrollment numbers for a while. December’s figures, the first full month after this weekend’s deadline, won’t be released until mid-January. But the reason the website’s problems are such a big deal is that they’re enrollment problems. In some states that built their own insurance exchanges, notably California, the pace of enrollment has picked up dramatically since initial technical problems were fixed. If the same happens with HealthCare.gov, Obamacare may well be in the clear. The administration can afford to fall a little short of the 7 million enrollees it expects to see this year, but each state’s exchange still needs a critical mass of enrollees — as well as a good mix of sick and healthy — to avoid massive premium hikes next year.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."