Former Treasury Chiefs Agree: Get the SEC Into the Climate Mix

The smoke stacks at American Electric Power's (AEP) Mountaineer coal power plant in New Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2,1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground.
National Journal
Ben Geman
June 24, 2014, 8:16 a.m.

A bi­par­tis­an pair of former Treas­ury sec­ret­ar­ies want the Se­cur­it­ies and Ex­change Com­mis­sion to get more ag­gress­ive with cor­por­ate Amer­ica when it comes to as­sess­ing the risks of cli­mate change.

Robert Ru­bin and Henry Paulson — who served un­der Pres­id­ents Clin­ton and George W. Bush, re­spect­ively, and who both have deep Wall Street ties — said Tues­day that the SEC should do a bet­ter job of for­cing com­pan­ies to dis­close the eco­nom­ic fal­lout they face from cli­mate change.

Ru­bin said com­pan­ies, in fil­ings with reg­u­lat­ors, should be dis­clos­ing in­form­a­tion such as as­sets that may be “stran­ded” someday due to cli­mate change. They also urged them to dis­close the “baseline” ways cli­mate change may af­fect their busi­ness and emis­sions they may be “ac­count­able” for at some point.

“If busi­nesses had to dis­close that, then that would be­come an in­cent­ive for busi­ness to act,” said Ru­bin, a top Gold­man Sachs of­fi­cial be­fore join­ing the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion, and who later served on Cit­ig­roup’s board for a dec­ade.

Ru­bin spoke dur­ing the New York City rol­lout of a re­port called “Risky Busi­ness: The Eco­nom­ic Risks of Cli­mate Change to the United States,” which aims to quanti­fy risks to coastal in­fra­struc­ture, crops, labor pro­ductiv­ity, and more.

It’s the fruit of a group called the Risky Busi­ness Pro­ject led by Paulson, former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg, and bil­lion­aire former hedge-fund chief Tom Stey­er. Ru­bin is among the group’s ad­visers.

Paulson made a sim­il­ar point Tues­day about the SEC, not­ing “per­haps the SEC should be re­quir­ing dis­clos­ures.”

The SEC already does re­quire them, but act­iv­ists say it’s a largely tooth­less pro­gram thus far, and it’s provid­ing little in­form­a­tion to in­vestors.

In 2010, the SEC is­sued guidelines about how pub­licly traded com­pan­ies should be de­scrib­ing vari­ous types of risks from cli­mate change un­der ex­ist­ing dis­clos­ure rules, such as how state and fed­er­al cli­mate policies will af­fect them and the phys­ic­al ef­fects of cli­mate change.

But in an early 2014 re­port, the sus­tain­able-in­vest­ment ad­vocacy group Ceres said that des­pite the 2010 SEC policy, most large com­pan­ies (they looked at the S&P 500) are say­ing little to noth­ing about the cli­mate risks in their SEC fil­ings. And the SEC isn’t do­ing much about it, the group said.

Ru­bin seems to agree. In fact, the Ceres ana­lys­is is ref­er­enced in the Risky Busi­ness re­port. In a New York Times piece about the re­port, Ru­bin told the news­pa­per that the dis­clos­ures are of­ten vague and in­ad­equate.

The Risky Busi­ness re­port it­self is a de­tailed re­gion­al look at eco­nom­ic vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies to cli­mate change.

“Un­til today, we have had no ways to meas­ure the ser­i­ous risks to our na­tion­al eco­nomy … from cli­mate change,” Bloomberg said dur­ing the re­port’s re­lease in New York. “Busi­nesses and in­vestors have largely been kept in the dark about how cli­mate change will im­pact spe­cif­ic in­dus­tries or spe­cif­ic re­gions, and that puts Amer­ic­an busi­nesses and the Amer­ic­an eco­nomy in an ex­tremely vul­ner­able po­s­i­tion.”

For in­stance, it notes pro­jec­tions that the South­east is due to ex­per­i­ence as many as sev­er­al dozen more days over 95 de­grees an­nu­ally by mid-cen­tury and many more by cen­tury’s end. This could cut labor pro­ductiv­ity by up to 3.2 per­cent in sec­tors like con­struc­tion, ag­ri­cul­ture, and man­u­fac­tur­ing.

Na­tion­wide, between $66 bil­lion and $106 bil­lion worth of ex­ist­ing coastal prop­erty will likely be be­low sea-level by mid-cen­tury, the re­port finds.

The re­port has the at­ten­tion of the White House. Paulson, Stey­er, and oth­ers in­volved with the re­port will meet Wed­nes­day with Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew and “seni­or” White House of­fi­cials, the White House said.

It’s one of sev­er­al cli­mate-re­lated events on the White House cal­en­dar this week. On Wed­nes­day night Pres­id­ent Obama will speak at a League of Con­ser­va­tion Voters din­ner.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×