Supreme Court Slightly Weakens EPA Global-Warming Program

The decision does not address EPA’s new proposals to set carbon-emissions standards for power plants.

Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
June 23, 2014, 6:54 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday slightly weakened the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s power to force in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources to curb green­house-gas emis­sions as a con­di­tion of their Clean Air Act per­mits.

The de­cision does not ad­dress EPA’s re­cent sweep­ing pro­pos­al to set car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants, which is a center­piece of Pres­id­ent Obama’s second-term cli­mate agenda. Nor does it chal­lenge EPA’s un­der­ly­ing au­thor­ity to reg­u­late heat-trap­ping emis­sions.

In­stead, the rul­ing ad­dresses an ex­ist­ing per­mit­ting pro­gram launched sev­er­al years ago.

The high court ruled 5-4 that EPA may only re­quire newly built or mod­i­fied in­dus­tri­al pol­lu­tion sources — such as power plants, re­finer­ies and factor­ies — to lim­it green­house gases if those same sources must already ob­tain per­mits for their so-called con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants. 

In prac­tice, that means only a slight change in the num­ber of big in­dus­tri­al pol­luters that would be cap­tured by the ex­ist­ing, case-by-case green­house-gas per­mit­ting pro­gram at is­sue in the case de­cided Monday. The per­mit­ting pro­gram it­self was not struck down.

The per­mit­ting pro­gram re­quires pol­luters to use so-called best avail­able con­trol tech­no­logy, which for green­house gases has largely meant in­creased en­ergy ef­fi­ciency thus far, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion noted when de­fend­ing the pro­gram be­fore the Court in Feb­ru­ary.

Lim­it­ing the pro­gram to fa­cil­it­ies that must already get per­mits for their con­ven­tion­al pol­lut­ants (such as emis­sions that cause smog) ad­dresses the sources of 83 per­cent of U.S. green­house-gas emis­sions from in­dus­tri­al pol­luters, com­pared with 86 per­cent without that re­stric­tion, ac­cord­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

“EPA is get­ting al­most everything it wanted in this case,” Justice Ant­on­in Scalia said from the bench in an­noun­cing the rul­ing Monday, ac­cord­ing to press ac­counts.

However, there will be plenty of tea-leaves read­ing about what this por­tends for the sweep­ing power-plant stand­ards that EPA is plan­ning to fi­nal­ize next June, es­pe­cially about wheth­er con­ser­vat­ive justices will take a nar­row view of the scope of EPA’s dis­cre­tion in craft­ing that reg­u­la­tion.

EPA called the rul­ing a vic­tory.

“The Su­preme Court’s de­cision is a win for our ef­forts to re­duce car­bon pol­lu­tion be­cause it al­lows EPA, states, and oth­er per­mit­ting au­thor­it­ies to con­tin­ue to re­quire car­bon-pol­lu­tion lim­its in per­mits for the largest pol­lu­tion sources,” the agency said in a state­ment.

However, the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, one of an ar­ray of in­dustry lob­by­ing groups to chal­lenge EPA’s per­mit­ting rules, saw good news as well.

“It is a stark re­mind­er that the EPA’s power is not un­lim­ited,” said Harry Ng, the group’s gen­er­al coun­sel.

MOST READ
  1. 1 I’m Not Broken
What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×