Should Climate Change Come With a Warning Label?

None

An enormous iceberg (R) breaks off the Knox Coast in the Australian Antarctic Territory on January 11, 2008. Australia's CSIRO's atmospheric research unit has found the world is warming faster than predicted by the United Nations' top climate change body, with harmful emissions exceeding worst-case estimates. 
National Journal
Clare Foran
June 17, 2014, 9:39 a.m.

Air pol­lu­tion could soon come with a warn­ing la­bel.

At least if you live in Berke­ley, Cal­if. The city is weigh­ing a pro­pos­al that re­quires gas-sta­tion own­ers to at­tach air-pol­lu­tion warn­ing la­bels to gas pumps. The la­bels alert cus­tom­ers that gas­ol­ine con­sump­tion re­leases car­bon di­ox­ide, which in turn con­trib­utes to cli­mate change.

And they don’t mince words. “GLOB­AL WARM­ING ALERT!” a mock-up of the la­bels screams in all cap­it­al let­ters.

The pro­posed or­din­ance is the brainchild of the San Fran­cisco Bay Area chapter of grass­roots en­vir­on­ment­al or­gan­iz­a­tion 350.org. It might seem far fetched to some, but it’s gain­ing trac­tion in a city with a pen­chant for pro­gress­ive polit­ics.

“We already re­quire ci­gar­ette packs to in­clude warn­ing la­bels,” Mat­thew Lewis, the co-chair of the Chan­cel­lor’s Ad­vis­ory Com­mit­tee on Sus­tain­ab­il­ity at Berke­ley told the Daily Cali­for­ni­an earli­er this week. “Re­quir­ing la­bels at gas pumps would sim­il­arly keep the harm of burn­ing gas­ol­ine fresh in people’s minds.”

Berke­ley’s Com­munity En­vir­on­ment­al Ad­vis­ory Com­mis­sion ap­proved the plan Thursday. The pro­pos­al now awaits a City Coun­cil vote, which is ex­pec­ted to take place in the next few weeks.

Of course, not every­one is thrilled.

The West­ern States Pet­ro­leum As­so­ci­ation — a trade or­gan­iz­a­tion for pet­ro­leum pro­du­cers and re­finers — had harsh words for the pro­pos­al.

In a let­ter sent to the com­mis­sion last week, as­so­ci­ation pres­id­ent Cath­er­ine Re­he­is-Boyd said the plan would vi­ol­ate free speech by for­cing gas-sta­tion own­ers to af­fix the la­bels to their prop­erty. 

“This is the type of forced speech that the United States Su­preme Court has ruled is ab­so­lutely un­con­sti­tu­tion­al,” Re­he­is-Boyd wrote.

What We're Following See More »
CYBER THREATS INCREASING
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

Source:
CLYBURN WEIGHING HIS OWN NOD
CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.”

Source:
MORE TENSIONS ON KOREAN PENINSULA
Senate Votes 96-0 to Sanction North Korea
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a unanimous vote Wednesday night, the Senate echoed the House’s move last month to stiffen sanctions against North Korea. The bill “would sanction anyone who engages in, facilitates or contributes to North Korea’s proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, arms-related materials, luxury goods, human rights abuses, activities undermining cyber security and the provision of materials for such activities.” Senate Democrats said they expect the president to sign the bill. In related news, after South Korea suspended operations at a jointly run power station in the North, Pyongyang declared the area a military zone and cut off a hotline between the two countries.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.

Source:
×