Cantor’s Downfall Won’t Push the GOP Rightward on Climate Change”“There’s No More Room

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) makes remarks during a news briefing at the U.S. Captiol March 25, 2010 in Washington, DC. Cantor said that leaders from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee have turned threats against Democrats who voted for the health care reform package into a political issue.
National Journal
Ben Geman
June 11, 2014, 2:23 p.m.

Eric Can­tor’s loss to tea-party in­sur­gent Dave Brat could doom im­mig­ra­tion re­form and fuel the next battle over rais­ing the debt ceil­ing.

But when it comes to cli­mate-change policy, em­bolden­ing the GOP’s con­ser­vat­ive wing won’t push the House right­ward much — if at all. That’s be­cause there’s little room to move any fur­ther in that dir­ec­tion.

Many hot-but­ton is­sues ex­pose fault lines in the GOP. Some Re­pub­lic­ans — backed by the busi­ness com­munity — are open to ac­tion on im­mig­ra­tion-re­form le­gis­la­tion, while swaths of the con­ser­vat­ive base op­pose any­thing that would provide cit­izen­ship to any un­doc­u­mented res­id­ents.

Sim­il­arly, on the debt ceil­ing, the busi­ness lobby has battled GOP con­ser­vat­ives who have res­isted lift­ing the na­tion’s bor­row­ing lim­it, at least without steep White House con­ces­sions.

These big di­vides just aren’t there on car­bon-emis­sions policy. In re­cent years, House Re­pub­lic­ans, backed by the party’s es­tab­lish­ment fig­ures, have voted over­whelm­ingly to nul­li­fy EPA’s power to reg­u­late car­bon emis­sions.

An ar­ray of power­ful busi­ness groups like the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce and the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Man­u­fac­tur­ers have backed vari­ous pieces of House GOP le­gis­la­tion to strip or greatly lim­it EPA’s power to curb emis­sions from power plants and factor­ies.

The har­mony between in­dustry goals and con­ser­vat­ives is of­ten present on a range of oth­er en­ergy is­sues, too, though there could be ten­sions over tax cred­its that hard-liners and con­ser­vat­ive ad­vocacy groups want to kill.

The House GOP has voted with unity — and sup­port from busi­ness and in­dustry groups — in re­cent years to lift off­shore-drilling re­stric­tions, kill planned fed­er­al reg­u­la­tion of “frack­ing,” and nul­li­fy vari­ous oth­er EPA and In­teri­or De­part­ment rules.

On the re­lated ques­tion of cli­mate sci­ence, many Re­pub­lic­ans re­ject or strongly ques­tion the sci­entif­ic con­sensus around hu­man-in­duced cli­mate change, but subtle di­vides may be emer­ging.

In late May, House Speak­er John Boehner said EPA’s car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants would hurt the eco­nomy, but he passed up a chance to at­tack cli­mate sci­ence, in­stead telling re­port­ers: “I’m not qual­i­fied to de­bate the sci­ence.”

But when it comes to op­pos­ing green­house-emis­sions con­trols, House Re­pub­lic­ans speak with one voice.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×