10 Years of Pollution, $2 Million in Penalties

In Texas, an old pollution case is looming over new development.

National Journal
Ben Geman
May 21, 2014, 1:16 a.m.

COR­PUS CHRISTI, Texas — “I am in the middle of my speech about your crim­in­al activ­it­ies, give me a break,” Su­zie Canales tells two se­cur­ity of­ficers for oil re­finer Cit­go as they ar­rive at her car win­dow.

Canales, a long­time en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ist, is de­scrib­ing a years-long court battle over air pol­lu­tion from the re­finer, a case that led to a 2007 con­vic­tion but, more re­cently, a de­feat for vic­tims seek­ing resti­tu­tion. And she’s do­ing it while parked next to one of two Cit­go re­finer­ies along the city’s “re­finery row” on a re­cent af­ter­noon.

Her pres­ence (and mine), as well as the fact that we were snap­ping pho­tos, has drawn se­cur­ity’s at­ten­tion. One re­quests that no more pho­tos are taken, ar­guing a pass is needed. Canales bristles be­cause we’re on a pub­lic street. The private cops ac­cept my busi­ness card, and that’s pretty much it.

The brief in­cid­ent is a re­mind­er of long-stand­ing ten­sions between act­iv­ists and the city’s pet­ro­leum in­dustry at a time when even more in­dus­tri­al de­vel­op­ment is headed here. Boom­ing oil and gas pro­duc­tion from the in­land Eagle Ford Shale is prompt­ing a wave of new and ex­pan­ded pet­ro­chem­ic­al and man­u­fac­tur­ing pro­jects in the area.

Canales, founder of the loc­al group Cit­izens for En­vir­on­ment­al Justice, has a knack for col­or­ful state­ments. But her re­peated use of the word “crim­in­al” to de­scribe Cit­go wasn’t hy­per­bole.

Cit­go was con­victed of crim­in­al charges un­der the Clean Air Act in 2007 for op­er­at­ing two large tanks at its Cor­pus Christi East Plant without emis­sions con­trols from 1994 to 2003. The lack of con­trols, pro­sec­utors say, ex­posed nearby res­id­ents to the car­ci­no­gen ben­zene and oth­er com­pounds.

But sev­en years after the con­vic­tion, the case is still a fo­cus of at­ten­tion in this in­dus­tri­al port city on the Gulf Coast of Texas, where re­finer­ies abut largely poor and minor­ity neigh­bor­hoods. Vic­tims are con­tinu­ing to press their case for resti­tu­tion pay­ments from Cit­go for hun­dreds of people.

Cit­go was hit with a $2 mil­lion fine when sen­ten­cing for the 2007 con­vic­tion oc­curred in Feb­ru­ary, but more re­cently a fed­er­al judge ruled against provid­ing what the Justice De­part­ment and vic­tims say should be far more to ad­dress fu­ture med­ic­al costs and more.

Melissa Jar­rell, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or of crim­in­al justice at Texas A&M Uni­versity (Cor­pus Christi), said the $2 mil­lion fine im­posed against Cit­go early this year sends the wrong sig­nal.

“There is no de­terrent value, really, in our sen­ten­cing guidelines for cor­por­a­tions, be­cause we know that $2 mil­lion is not a de­terrent for a ma­jor, mult­i­bil­lion-dol­lar cor­por­a­tion,” Jar­rell, who works with act­iv­ists here, said in an in­ter­view in early May. “I’m cer­tain oth­er cor­por­a­tions saw that.”

The pen­alty that dis­trict court Judge John Rainey im­posed is in­deed re­l­at­ively little money for the ma­jor re­finer, a sub­si­di­ary of Venezuela’s state-owned oil com­pany PDVSA.

The Justice De­part­ment has ar­gued that a vastly lar­ger fine could be im­posed, and has not ruled out an ap­peal. Two mil­lion dol­lars was the max­im­um fine spe­cified in law, but cor­por­ate crime stat­utes also al­low an al­tern­at­ive of twice the gain that an of­fend­er reaped, and pro­sec­utors ar­gued Cit­go gained $1 bil­lion through il­leg­al op­er­a­tion of the re­finery.

The very re­cent past has brought two key de­vel­op­ments in the case.

On April 30, the judge handed the Justice De­part­ment and com­munity mem­bers a de­feat by re­ject­ing vic­tims’ bid for tens of mil­lions of dol­lars in resti­tu­tion to pay for med­ic­al screen­ing for can­cer and oth­er dis­eases, fu­ture med­ic­al ex­penses, and re­lo­ca­tion of people who live near the re­finery.

On Monday, a three-judge pan­el of the U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the 5th Cir­cuit denied the vic­tims’ bid for re­view of Rainey’s April 30 rul­ing. The Justice De­part­ment says it’s re­view­ing the April 30 rul­ing, which can also be ap­pealed by the de­part­ment, and a spokes­man said in a state­ment that the de­part­ment is “dis­ap­poin­ted” by the de­cision to deny resti­tu­tion.

People who live near the re­finery have told the court that they ex­per­i­enced ail­ments such as head­aches, skin ir­rit­a­tion, fa­tigue, burn­ing throat and lungs, and oth­er woes.

But Cit­go has ar­gued in court fil­ings that there is no evid­ence to sup­port pay­ing tens of mil­lions of dol­lars in resti­tu­tion.

For in­stance, in a late 2013 court fil­ing, the com­pany ar­gued that hun­dreds of cur­rent and former res­id­ents who provided state­ments to the court have not shown that their in­jur­ies were “dir­ect and prox­im­ate” res­ults of emis­sions from the two un­covered tanks in ques­tion at the re­finery.

The com­pany also said there’s no evid­ence of long-term health risks.

In his 20-page April 30 rul­ing deny­ing resti­tu­tion, Rainey spells out a suite of reas­ons for the de­cision, in­clud­ing the com­plex­ity of at­tempt­ing to tie med­ic­al prob­lems to the un­checked emis­sions from 1994-2003 at those spe­cif­ic tanks.

Paul Cas­sell, a crim­in­al-law pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Utah who rep­res­ents Cor­pus Christi res­id­ents liv­ing near the re­finery, says the case “raises a lot of very ser­i­ous ques­tions about wheth­er we have in place stat­utes to pro­tect crime vic­tims in these en­vir­on­ment­al crimes.”

He says the rul­ing that fo­cuses on the com­plex­ity of resti­tu­tion as a reas­on against it is dan­ger­ous. “That ba­sic­ally be­comes an in­vite for ma­jor cor­por­ate crim­in­als to throw a bat­tery of at­tor­neys at a prob­lem and com­plic­ate the is­sue and ba­sic­ally make it im­possible for a judge to award resti­tu­tion,” Cas­sell said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×