A new front has opened up in the fight over fossil fuels.
A bipartisan pair of lawmakers is hoping to pit one federal agency against another in a bid to soften the blow of upcoming regulations to curb air pollution from power plants. And if they get their way, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission — the executive-branch agency with oversight of the nation’s electric grid — could act as a check on the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Rob Portman of Ohio voiced concerns over the EPA’s power-plant rule at a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on Tuesday to consider Norman Bay’s nomination to head FERC. The senators expressed fears that the regulations could disrupt the supply of electricity by causing coal plants to shut down. And they asked Bay — the current director of the agency’s Office of Enforcement — if he would stand up to the EPA if the rules threaten grid reliability.
Bay said yes. “I very much respect the work of the EPA. They have an important job to do,” he said during the hearing. “But FERC has an important job to do as well, and for FERC, two of our key responsibilities are reliability and ensuring that rates are just and reasonable.”
The confirmation contender said that FERC would weigh in on the draft regulation after it’s released early next month. He also pledged to put EPA on notice if the rules look like they would impact the flow of electrons across the nation’s grid. His assurances could win over coal-state sympathizers who have long argued that the regulations will hinder safe power supply.
For Bay, making friends with fossil-fuel backers is a crucial step to securing confirmation. The president’s previous pick to lead FERC — former utility regulator Ron Binz — withdrew his nomination last fall in the face of intense opposition from senators such as Manchin and ranking member Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who claimed that he favored clean energy over fossil fuels.
In the end, however, Bay’s ability to shape the rule is limited. The current acting chairwoman of the agency, Cheryl LaFleur, threw cold water on the idea that FERC could upend the rule altogether. Referring to EPA, LaFleur said, “I don’t have control over what they ultimately rule, but I would always speak honestly if there were a reliability issue.”
That answer won’t sit well with friends of fossil fuels — but, for now, it may be the most they can get.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."