Why Is Texas Terrible at Producing Solar Power?

None

CHICAGO - SEPTEMBER 01: Solar photovoltaic panels generate electricity at an Exelon solar power facility on September 1, 2010 in Chicago, Illinois. The 10-megawatt facility located on the city's south side is the largest urban solar installation in the United States. The 32,292 panels can generate more than 14,000 megawatt-hours of electricity per year, enough to meet the annual energy requirements of up to 1,500 homes.
National Journal
Clare Foran Jason Plautz and Patrick Reis
May 15, 2014, 3:41 p.m.

Texas is an en­ergy su­per­power, and not just for fossil fuels. The Lone Star State pro­duces more nat­ur­al gas than any oth­er state, but it also leads the na­tion in wind en­ergy.

It’s also a massive, South­ern, sun-baked state that is so full of the wide-open spaces needed for sol­ar pan­els that it rivals Cali­for­nia for the na­tion’s largest sol­ar-en­ergy po­ten­tial, ac­cord­ing to an En­ergy De­part­ment re­port. Texas, the re­port says, is home to a full 20 per­cent of total U.S. po­ten­tial for con­cen­trated sol­ar power.

Only a tiny per­cent­age of that po­ten­tial, however, has been ex­ploited. Ac­cord­ing to the Sol­ar En­ergy In­dus­tries As­so­ci­ation, Texas has only about 200 mega­watts worth of sol­ar-power pan­els in­stalled. That’s less than is cur­rently fir­ing in New Jer­sey, Mas­sachu­setts, and New York.

So why is Texas’s sol­ar sec­tor flounder­ing when oth­er en­ergy sources, even oth­er fledgling re­new­able-en­ergy sources, are sur­ging? In short, be­cause a con­flu­ence of policy choices and eco­nom­ic forces have stun­ted the state’s sol­ar growth — and few sol­ar ad­voc­ates see hope that the state land­scape will change any­time soon.

“It’s frus­trat­ing be­cause you look and you think, ‘Wow, this could be amaz­ing,’ ” said Car­rie Cul­len Hitt, seni­or vice pres­id­ent of state af­fairs for the Sol­ar En­ergy In­dus­tries As­so­ci­ation. “Be­cause it’s a new mar­ket, you need some eco­nom­ies of scale go­ing in and those states had some policies in place, be they re­bates or tax in­cent­ives. Texas doesn’t have those things “¦ and be­cause of that, they have not had the mar­ket star­tup mech­an­isms in place.”

But any push for such policies has a high hurdle to over­come: the hy­per-par­tis­an­ship of the na­tion’s en­ergy de­bate.

A dec­ade ago, policies sup­port­ing re­new­able en­ergy were largely viewed through the lens of in­vest­ment, and as such had sig­ni­fic­ant state-level suc­cess in at­tract­ing bi­par­tis­an sup­port. Now — after a bloody con­gres­sion­al struggle over the cap-and-trade cli­mate bill — such sup­ports are in­creas­ingly viewed as a polit­ic­al state­ment. In deep-red Texas, there’s little le­gis­lat­ive ap­pet­ite to re­struc­tur­ing the state’s en­ergy policies to find new sup­port for sol­ar.

And so Texas is likely to con­tin­ue for­ward with a leg­al code that, thus far, has failed to sig­ni­fic­antly spur sol­ar in­vest­ment.

Texas is one of 29 states with a re­new­able-en­ergy stand­ard — a goal for get­ting a cer­tain amount of its power from sources like wind, sol­ar, and oth­er fossil-fuel al­tern­at­ives. When the stand­ard was signed in­to law in 1999 it called for 2,000 mega­watts of ad­di­tion­al re­new­able power gen­er­a­tion to be brought on­line with­in a dec­ade. But with­in that stand­ard, there was no spe­cif­ic re­quire­ment that any of those in­stall­a­tions come from sol­ar power. And without that re­quire­ment, de­velopers over­whelm­ingly chose wind en­ergy — which for in­vestors was both more fa­mil­i­ar and, as it fre­quently re­quires lower front-end costs, less risky.

Texas also lacks “net-meter­ing,” a policy that has helped sol­ar flour­ish else­where. Net-meter­ing al­lows res­id­en­tial sol­ar cus­tom­ers to earn full re­tail cred­it for ex­cess elec­tri­city that they sell back to the grid. It’s a policy that’s on the books in 43 states, but doesn’t ex­ist at the state level in Texas. Power pro­viders there have the op­tion to cre­ate sol­ar-power in­cent­ive pro­grams of their own, but few­er than one in 10 has done so, ac­cord­ing to a 2011 re­port from the non­profit con­sumer-ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Cit­izen.

Sol­ar’s main sup­port in Texas comes from a fed­er­al policy. The sol­ar in­vest­ment tax cred­it is a 30 per­cent tax cred­it made avail­able to res­id­en­tial and com­mer­cial sol­ar pro­jects.

To be sure, not all of sol­ar’s Texas woes stem from state-level policies. The en­ergy source has also taken a beat­ing from eco­nom­ic forces. Elec­tri­city is typ­ic­ally dirt cheap in Texas, mak­ing it hard for any power plant to turn a profit, es­pe­cially one with high up-front costs like a sol­ar farm. And the frack­ing boom has stiffened com­pet­i­tion for sol­ar en­ergy as the sup­ply glut and res­ult­ing price dip in fuel prices has made nat­ur­al-gas power plants a more at­tract­ive op­tion.

But ad­voc­ates in­sist that with the right policies, sol­ar has strong po­ten­tial in Texas — and they point to two cit­ies where it has flour­ished: San Ant­o­nio and, to a less­er ex­tent, Aus­tin.

San Ant­o­nio has 90 mega­watts of util­ity-scale sol­ar on­line with an­oth­er 15 mega­watts from dir­ect gen­er­a­tion, and util­ity CPS En­ergy es­tim­ates there’s an­oth­er 385 mega­watts com­ing on­line over the next two to three years. That’s been enough to rank the River City sixth na­tion­wide in sol­ar ca­pa­city, ac­cord­ing to an April re­port from En­vir­on­ment Texas, and has at­trac­ted sol­ar com­pan­ies to set up shop in the city.

Aus­tin, mean­while, has 16 mega­watts on­line.

What sets them apart? Both cit­ies have mu­ni­cip­al util­it­ies that had more free­dom to set in­de­pend­ent re­new­able goals and of­fer re­bates than the de­reg­u­lated mar­kets else­where in the state. Lanny Sinkin, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the non­profit Sol­ar San Ant­o­nio, said the abil­ity of a mu­ni­cip­al util­ity to “look at val­ues bey­ond the bot­tom line” has made city-level ini­ti­at­ives more suc­cess­ful.

And from that, sol­ar ad­voc­ates see hope for broad­er pro­gress.

“We have as­sumed that we had to de­vel­op a strategy that did not rely on state sup­port,” said Lanny Sinkin, the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Sol­ar San Ant­o­nio. “It was just nev­er go­ing to come and de­vel­op the strategy for how to get it. Now I think that with the rap­id ex­pan­sion of sol­ar in Texas, there’s go­ing to be more and more polit­ic­al sup­port.”

And ul­ti­mately, sol­ar’s best hope in Texas likely comes not from policy, but from tech­no­logy. The cost of sol­ar pan­els is fall­ing pre­cip­it­ously, as sci­ent­ists de­vel­op more ef­fi­cient man­u­fac­tur­ing mod­els and cheap­er Chinese mod­els hit the mar­ket. And even for a green en­ergy source in a red state, it’s dif­fi­cult to ar­gue with a lower price tag.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×