Sen. James Inhofe thinks climate change is a hoax, but that doesn’t mean the Oklahoma Republican would be disqualified from a job at the Obama administration’s Interior Department.
“There is no litmus test [on climate change] for people at the Department of the Interior,” Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said Thursday.
She spoke at a House hearing after coming under fire from Louisiana Republican and climate skeptic John Fleming, who brought up Jewell’s 2013 remark that “I hope there are no climate-change deniers in the Department of Interior.”
“Is that a purity test for someone to work for you in the Department of Interior, which is a very large department? That means that in your opinion everyone should agree with you that there is such thing as man-made climate change?,” Fleming said at a Natural Resources Committee hearing on Interior’s budget.
But Jewell responded “absolutely not,” and added that she “didn’t talk about causes of climate change” in her 2013 remarks. During the exchange Jewell also reminded Fleming of her other comments in her summer 2013 address to Interior employees.
According to Environment and Energy Publishing, Jewell said in the speech that if there are climate deniers at Interior, they should travel to lands the agency manages affected by climate change, such as melting permafrost in Alaska.
Jewell picked up on that theme Thursday.
“In context I said I have been on the lands and waters around the Department of the Interior and it would be very difficult to see the lands that I have seen and deny that climate change is going on,” she said.
“Every place I have gone on public lands, I see droughts, I see wildfires, I see coastal erosion, I see the impact of storms and that is a reality that we are facing in this country,” said Jewell, whose prepared remarks touted Interior’s efforts to improve “resiliency” to climate change.
Fleming used the hearing to reiterate his doubt about human-induced climate change. “There is controversy over that issue and disagreement, even among very excellent scientists,” he said.
However, the scientific consensus is that global warming is occurring and that human activities are driving the changes. An extremely small minority of scientists disagree or call the evidence inconclusive.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"