White House Doubles Down on Green-Tech Loan Program

Energy Secretary and hair fashion pioneer Edward Moniz.
National Journal
Ben Geman
April 2, 2014, 2:43 p.m.

Solyn­dra be damned.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is de­fi­antly re­viv­ing a green-tech­no­logy loan pro­gram that be­came a mag­net for GOP polit­ic­al at­tacks.

It’s ba­sic­ally the same pro­gram that fin­anced the in­fam­ous sol­ar-pan­el com­pany Solyn­dra, which fell apart in 2011, tak­ing a half-bil­lion dol­lars in fed­er­al loans along with it.

Solyn­dra was among a num­ber of Obama-backed green-en­ergy or auto com­pan­ies that either col­lapsed or struggled badly, turn­ing the pro­gram in­to a punch­ing bag for Re­pub­lic­ans and spark­ing GOP-led con­gres­sion­al probes.

But the White House and its al­lies have long said the pro­gram has been a big suc­cess in the main des­pite some flops.

En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz, on the job since mid-2013, has been a staunch de­fend­er of fed­er­al green-tech loan pro­grams. And now his plan to re­vive them seems to be pick­ing up speed.

On Wed­nes­day Mon­iz said that the de­part­ment would prob­ably throw open the door to new ap­plic­a­tions for re­new­able-en­ergy pro­ject loan guar­an­tees dur­ing the second quarter of this year, a some­what more pre­cise fore­cast than his pre­vi­ous es­tim­ate of “re­l­at­ively soon.”

Also Wed­nes­day, the En­ergy De­part­ment said it’s re­boot­ing the sep­ar­ate Ad­vanced Tech­no­logy Vehicles Man­u­fac­tur­ing (ATVM) loan pro­gram in pre­par­a­tion for of­fer­ing the first new loans in years.

That pro­gram has pre­vi­ously sup­por­ted Ford, Nis­san, and the elec­tric-vehicle com­pan­ies Tesla, which re­paid its loan ahead of sched­ule, and Fisker, which fell apart after draw­ing nearly $200 mil­lion in fed­er­al loans (DOE re­covered $53 mil­lion, and the com­pany is now un­der new own­er­ship).

DOE’s loan-pro­grams of­fice, in a let­ter today to auto equip­ment makers, an­nounced that pro­jects to man­u­fac­ture a “broad range” of com­pon­ent tech­no­lo­gies are eli­gible for loans.

The ATVM pro­gram, which ac­cord­ing to the de­part­ment can provide an­oth­er $16 bil­lion worth of new loans, also said it has taken steps to make the ap­plic­a­tion pro­cess faster and more re­spons­ive.

“Mo­tor vehicle parts man­u­fac­tur­ers play a sig­ni­fic­ant role in the de­vel­op­ment and de­ploy­ment of new tech­no­lo­gies to meet the de­mand for fuel-ef­fi­cient vehicles and we be­lieve the ATVM Loan Pro­gram can play an im­port­ant fin­an­cing role as the in­dustry es­tab­lishes the next gen­er­a­tion of man­u­fac­tur­ing fa­cil­it­ies in the United States,” Mon­iz said in a state­ment.

The loan pro­grams for low-emis­sions tech­no­logy pro­jects and green-car man­u­fac­tur­ing were first au­thor­ized in bi­par­tis­an 2005 and 2007 en­ergy laws. But loans for re­new­able-en­ergy pro­jects, aided by the 2009 stim­u­lus law, didn’t be­gin un­til Obama was in of­fice. Nor did the ATVM loans.

In 2009-11, the two pro­grams sup­por­ted auto­makers and an ar­ray of sol­ar and wind-power pro­jects, a few sol­ar-equip­ment makers (in­clud­ing Solyn­dra), and oth­er ven­tures.

The de­part­ment re­cently fi­nal­ized a loan guar­an­tee for a nuc­le­ar power pro­ject in Geor­gia, and it’s tak­ing ap­plic­a­tions for pet­ro­leum- and coal-re­lated pro­jects that trap car­bon emis­sions.

For the next wave of loan guar­an­tees, however, the de­part­ment won’t have as much money to work with as it did sev­er­al years ago, when it backed big pro­jects like the massive Ivan­pah sol­ar sta­tion in Cali­for­nia.

Peter Dav­id­son, the head the DOE loan pro­gram, re­cently sug­ges­ted that a fo­cus of the re­vived pro­gram would be ini­ti­at­ives that help in­teg­rate re­new­able power onto the grid, as op­posed to big power-gen­er­a­tion pro­jects.

While polit­ic­al at­tacks against the loan pro­gram have died down, they haven’t gone away en­tirely, as Re­pub­lic­ans con­tin­ue to ar­gue that the green-tech loan pro­grams have been waste­ful, un­needed, and poorly run.

In­deed, the House Re­pub­lic­ans’ budget plan un­veiled this week would block fu­ture loans. But the pro­pos­al is only a sym­bol­ic state­ment of party prin­ciples; the top­ic is no longer front-and-cen­ter for the House GOP, at least for now.

And while the pro­gram has taken its lumps, Re­pub­lic­ans who used two House com­mit­tees to probe it nev­er un­covered evid­ence to sup­port their most sa­la­cious claims.

In par­tic­u­lar, a lengthy En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee probe com­pleted in Au­gust 2012 didn’t back up ac­cus­a­tions — echoed of­ten by Re­pub­lic­ans and their al­lies on the 2012 cam­paign trail — that fed­er­al loans to Solyn­dra and oth­er pro­jects were re­wards for polit­ic­al dona­tions.

The in­vest­ig­a­tions did un­earth rev­el­a­tions and in­tern­al doc­u­ments that were em­bar­rass­ing and polit­ic­ally dam­aging for the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, such as emails show­ing pres­sure to fi­nal­ize the Solyn­dra deal des­pite in­tern­al con­cerns.

Mon­iz, however, is seek­ing to play of­fense in sup­port of the loan pro­gram. He’s happy to make the case that the over­all loan port­fo­lio is per­form­ing strongly.

“We have been tak­ing the po­s­i­tion quite con­sist­ently — and we’re happy to dis­cuss it any place, any time — that the pro­gram as a port­fo­lio has done ex­tremely well,” Mon­iz told re­port­ers after testi­fy­ing on Wed­nes­day be­fore the GOP-led House Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee in a two-hour-plus hear­ing that was free of at­tacks on the pro­gram.

The $30 bil­lion-plus port­fo­lio’s losses have been about 2.5 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to the En­ergy De­part­ment. Mon­iz noted that the pro­gram has used only a small amount of the “loan loss re­serve” that Con­gress provided.

He even saw room for some loan-pro­gram hu­mor.

“Maybe I’m wor­ried that the ar­gu­ments will change,” Mon­iz told re­port­ers. “That we’re not tak­ing enough risk.”

What We're Following See More »
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
BUT WOULD HE THROW THE CHAIR?
Bobby Knight: Trump Would Drop the Bomb Just Like Truman
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×