The White House made its strongest statement yet Wednesday that it views U.S. natural-gas exports as one tool to curb Europe’s reliance on Russian energy and diversify supplies.
From the joint U.S.-European Union statement issued alongside the U.S.-E.U. summit in Brussels: “The situation in Ukraine proves the need to reinforce energy security in Europe, and we are considering new collaborative efforts to achieve this goal. We welcome the prospect of U.S. LNG exports in the future since additional global supplies will benefit Europe and other strategic partners.”
Other tools include reversing natural-gas flows to allow other E.U. nations to ship gas into Ukraine and more collaboration on efficiency, renewables, and other sources. Check out the whole thing here.
President Obama, in remarks in Brussels, more broadly said that energy is a “central focus” of the response to Russia’s annexation of Crimea. “This entire event has pointed to the need for Europe to look at how it can diversify its energy sources,” he said, The Wall Street Journal reports.
Obama pointed out that the proposed U.S.-E.U. trade deal, called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, would ease the way for sending U.S. gas to Europe.
“Once we have a trade agreement in place, export licences for projects for liquefied natural gas destined to Europe would be much easier, something that is obviously relevant in today’s geopolitical environment,” Obama said after meeting with E.U. leaders, Reuters reports. But that trade deal faces hurdles in Congress.
National Journal‘s Jack Fitzpatrick has some on-the-ground coverage of Obama’s remarks here.
And back on Capitol Hill, where there’s plenty of support for exports, one analyst cautioned that there are real constraints on the ability of U.S. energy resources to isolate Russia.
“While the prospect of U.S. energy exports could usefully reduce Russian energy export revenues, U.S. exports will not displace Russia from its dominant position in the European market; claiming otherwise reduces U.S. credibility,” said Michael Levi, a senior fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, in testimony to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
What We're Following See More »
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."
Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs."
As unbound delegates pledged to Ted Cruz watch him "struggle to tread water in a primary increasingly dominated by Trump, many of them, wary of a bitter convention battle that could rend the party at its seams, are rethinking their commitment to the Texas senator."