Fracking’s Odd New Friend: Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin.
National Journal
Ben Geman
March 19, 2014, 1:49 a.m.

As Vladi­mir Putin pushes Rus­sia’s sphere of in­flu­ence farther in­to east­ern Europe, the White House, Cap­it­ol Hil, and K Street are all push­ing plans to counter Rus­sia’s en­ergy might with an en­ergy surge of their own.

But as they craft their strategy, the poli­cy­makers are lay­ing the ground­work for plans that green groups loathe. First and fore­most: li­que­fy­ing U.S. nat­ur­al gas and ex­port­ing it to for­eign mar­kets.

For en­vir­on­ment­al groups bat­tling a well-fin­anced in­dustry ex­port push, the glob­al se­cur­ity ele­ment adds a new chal­lenge to an already dif­fi­cult fight.

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists have long been bat­tling in­dustry claims that U.S. ap­prov­al of ex­pan­ded ex­ports would be a do­mest­ic eco­nom­ic boost.

But now they’re fa­cing a new ar­gu­ment: that ex­pan­ded and ex­por­ted en­ergy pro­duc­tion (and frack­ing ex­pert­ise) could boost the na­tion’s for­eign policy power — and do so without so much as fir­ing a bul­let.

“The crisis in Ukraine has brought … use of U.S. shale en­ergy in the ser­vice of na­tion­al se­cur­ity goals in­to main­stream, bi­par­tis­an policy dis­cus­sion,” said Eliza­beth Rosen­berg, dir­ect­or of the En­ergy, En­vir­on­ment, and Se­cur­ity Pro­gram at the Cen­ter for a New Amer­ic­an Se­cur­ity.

Ex­port back­ers on K Street and Cap­it­ol Hill have cited the Ukrain­i­an tu­mult to press for faster fed­er­al ap­prov­al of pro­pos­als stacked up at the En­ergy De­part­ment — and caught the at­ten­tion of en­vir­on­ment­al­ists.

Mi­chael Brune, the Si­erra Club’s ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or, sought to parry the no­tion that gas ex­ports are a way to bol­ster Europe’s en­ergy se­cur­ity.

“The idea that we should pro­mote an in­creased de­pend­ence on an­oth­er volat­ile fossil fuel as a solu­tion to a long-stand­ing prob­lem re­flects an in­ab­il­ity to em­brace the idea that we have to fight cli­mate change ef­fect­ively,” he said on a call with re­port­ers Tues­day.

The White House has been more cir­cum­spect than some Cap­it­ol Hill Re­pub­lic­ans when it comes to gas ex­ports as a way to aid Ukraine, or Europe over­all, which re­lies on Rus­sia for al­most a third of its gas.

And sure, there are plenty of reas­ons to be: U.S. LNG ship­ments would not start flow­ing un­til next year at the soon­est, and there are in­fra­struc­ture con­straints in Europe, among oth­er bar­ri­ers.

Any­way U.S. ex­port­ers, crit­ics note, can fetch high­er prices in Asia than Europe, al­though boost­ers say that more mo­lecules on the glob­al mar­ket over­all trans­lates in­to more sup­plies avail­able to Europe.

But the White House non­ethe­less also ap­pears open to view­ing U.S. ex­ports as a long-term way to help lessen European re­li­ance on Rus­si­an gas, a lot of which is piped through Ukraine.

On Tues­day, Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden and ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials, on the VP’s trip to East­ern Europe, made clear that en­ergy policy is a big part of the re­sponse to Rus­sia’s an­nex­a­tion of the Crimean pen­in­sula.

“In the com­ing weeks, we’ll be meet­ing with our European part­ners to dis­cuss ways to fur­ther di­ver­si­fy their source and sup­plies of en­ergy. This will help im­prove en­ergy se­cur­ity and it will en­sure that no na­tion can use the sup­ply of gas as a polit­ic­al weapon against any oth­er na­tion,” Biden, in a poin­ted ref­er­ence to Rus­sia, said along­side Pol­ish Prime Min­is­ter Don­ald Tusk on Tues­day.

A num­ber of ideas are in play, deal­ing with en­ergy ef­fi­ciency and new sup­ply sources, to help re­duce re­li­ance on Rus­si­an gas in Ukraine and Europe more broadly.

Among them: Help­ing European coun­tries re­pro­duce the frack­ing-en­abled shale gas boom that has sent U.S. gas pro­duc­tion to re­cord levels.

“The U.S. has worked closely with the Poles, both in terms of tech­no­logy with our com­pan­ies, and in terms of their reg­u­lat­ory struc­ture in Po­land to ex­ploit shale re­serves,” a seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said.

It’s part of what could grow­ing European in­terest in frack­ing, which has been banned in sev­er­al na­tions in­clud­ing France and Bul­garia.

“The Rus­si­an in­va­sion of the Crimean Pen­in­sula is giv­ing Europe new en­thu­si­asm for frack­ing,” wrote Keith John­son in For­eign Policy last week.

Gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials in the U.K., along with the East­ern European na­tions of Po­land, Ro­mania, and Ukraine have all ex­pressed in­terest in shale gas de­vel­op­ment, des­pite vary­ing de­grees of push­back from pub­lic health and safety ad­voc­ates.

On U.S. ex­ports, the seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial also hin­ted that the White House is sym­path­et­ic to the no­tion that U.S. gas ex­ports could even­tu­ally come in­to play.

“The United States is ob­vi­ously re­view­ing and con­sid­er­ing what we can and should do do­mest­ic­ally to serve both our in­terests and the in­terests of our European part­ners,” the of­fi­cial told re­port­ers en route to Lithuania, while cau­tion­ing that ex­ports are a “longer-term pro­pos­i­tion.”

But en­vir­on­ment­al­ists see ex­ports as an­oth­er cata­lyst for more U.S. frack­ing, and say LNG ex­ports worsen cli­mate change due to emis­sions from gas pro­duc­tion, trans­port, li­que­fac­tion, and ship­ping over­seas.

The En­ergy De­part­ment has ap­proved or con­di­tion­ally ap­proved six pro­pos­als to ship LNG to na­tions that lack form­al free-trade deals with the U.S. (those pro­pos­als are more heav­ily vet­ted). About two dozen oth­ers are un­der re­view.

On Tues­day, the Si­erra Club and 15 oth­er groups re­leased an open let­ter to Pres­id­ent Obama say­ing they’re “dis­turbed” by ad­min­is­tra­tion sup­port for frack­ing and LNG ex­ports.

“Emer­ging and cred­ible ana­lyses now show that ex­por­ted U.S. fracked gas is as harm­ful to the at­mo­sphere as the com­bus­tion of coal over­seas — if not worse,” states the let­ter from 350.org, Earth­hustice, En­vir­on­ment and Amer­ica and oth­er groups.

The cli­mate foot­print of nat­ur­al gas is heav­ily de­bated these days amid con­flict­ing stud­ies of the amount of the po­tent green­house gas meth­ane re­leased along the de­vel­op­ment chain, and com­pet­ing views about how man­age­able the leak­age is.

Brune said the let­ter — which fo­cuses in par­tic­u­lar on the planned Cove Point LNG pro­ject in Mary­land — was not planned in re­sponse to the European crisis and the pro-ex­port move­ment that it’s feed­ing.

But the let­ter’s un­veil­ing on the same day that White House of­fi­cials are talk­ing up the abil­ity of U.S. en­ergy to help Europe shows how the geo­pol­it­ic­al head­winds may now be blow­ing against the green move­ment.

Iron­ic­ally, Putin him­self has cri­ti­cized frack­ing. But at a time when Putin rising in the ranks of Amer­ica’s top pub­lic en­emies, his op­pos­i­tion is un­likely to do any­thing oth­er than boost frack­ing’s stand­ing.

Clare Foran contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
SHARES THEIR LOVE STORY
Bill Clinton Gets Personal in Convention Speech
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl,” started Bill Clinton. In his speech Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention, Clinton brought a personal touch, telling parallel stories of his relationship with Hillary Clinton and the work she has done throughout her career. He lauded the Democratic nominee for her career of work, touching on her earliest days of advocacy for children and those with disabilities while in law school, her role as Secretary of State, and her work in raising their daughter, Chelsea. Providing a number of anecdotes throughout the speech, Clinton built to a crescendo, imploring the audience to support his wife for president. "You should elect her, she'll never quit when the going gets tough," he said. "Your children and grandchildren will be grateful."

LOUD “BLACK LIVES MATTER” CHANTS RING OUT
Mothers Of The Movement Endorse Hillary Clinton
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A coalition of mothers whose children lost their lives in high profile cases across the country, known as the Mothers Of The Movement, were greeted with deafening chants of "Black Lives Matter" before telling their stories. The mothers of Sandra Bland, Jordan Davis, and Trayvon Martin spoke for the group, soliciting both tears and applause from the crowd. "Hillary Clinton has the compassion and understanding to comfort a grieving mother," said Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin. "And that's why, in the memory of our children, we are imploring you — all of you — to vote this election day."

SOUTH DAKOTA GIVES HER CLINCHING DELEGATES
Clinton Officially Democratic Nominee for President
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

With the South Dakota delegation announcing its delegate count, Hillary Rodham Clinton is officially the Democratic nominee for president, surpassing the 2383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Clinton is expected to speak at the convention on Thursday night and officially accept the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many People Protested in Philly Yesterday?
15 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About 5,500, according to official estimates. "The Monday figures marked a large increase from the protests at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, where even the largest protests only drew a couple of hundred demonstrators. But it’s a far cry from the 35,000 to 50,000 that Philadelphia city officials initially expected."

Source:
NO BATTLEGROUND STATES LEAN TRUMP
NY Times’ Upshot Gives Clinton 68% Chance to Win
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

Only a day after FiveThirtyEight's Now Cast gave Donald Trump a 57% chance of winning, the New York Times' Upshot fires back with its own analysis that shows Hillary Clinton with a 68% chance to be the next president. Its model "calculates win probabilities for each state," which incorporate recent polls plus "a state's past election results and national polling." Notably, all of the battleground states that "vote like the country as a whole" either lean toward Clinton or are toss-ups. None lean toward Trump.

Source:
×