Energy Department Prepares for Deeper Look at Crude Oil Exports

An empty tanker sits at the pier of Chevron's refinery in Richmond, Calif., which refines roughly 250,000 barrels of oil a day into products like gasoline, diesel and jet fuel.
National Journal
Ben Geman
March 4, 2014, 10:02 a.m.

HOU­S­TON — The En­ergy De­part­ment is pre­par­ing new ana­lyses of the po­ten­tial ef­fects of lift­ing U.S. re­stric­tions on crude oil ex­ports as polit­ic­al pres­sure on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to ease the dec­ades-old lim­its in­creases.

Adam Siem­in­ski, head of the En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion, said he en­vi­sions a “series of re­ports that be­gin to lay the found­a­tions to al­low poli­cy­makers to un­der­stand the is­sue.”

Siem­in­ski said the re­ports will ex­plore how crude ex­ports would af­fect re­fin­ing, in­fra­struc­ture, trans­port­a­tion, wheth­er con­tinu­ing the heavy re­stric­tions could sty­mie pro­duc­tion, and oth­er top­ics.

“EIA is go­ing to be in­vest­ig­at­ing a num­ber of these things and we will come out from time to time with re­ports that should help poli­cy­makers un­der­stand the is­sues,” Siem­in­ski at the IHS CER­AWeek con­fer­ence here.

“There are a num­ber of factors that go in­to try­ing to un­der­stand the role of ex­ports in the en­ergy area,” he ad­ded, not­ing that he has been think­ing of the top­ic since his ten­ure at EIA, the En­ergy De­part­ment’s in­de­pend­ent stat­ist­ic­al ana­lys­is arm, began.

The En­ergy De­part­ment does not set oil-ex­port policy, but de­part­ment of­fi­cials say they can provide ana­lyt­ic­al as­sist­ance to oth­er of­fi­cials and law­makers.

Ma­jor oil com­pan­ies and some law­makers, not­ably Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Re­pub­lic­an, say that the surge in U.S. pro­duc­tion means it’s time to re­con­sider the ma­jor ex­port re­stric­tions im­posed after the 1970s Ar­ab oil em­bargo.

Cur­rent U.S. policy al­lows only a small amount of crude oil ex­ports. Com­pan­ies in­clud­ing Ex­xon and Chev­ron want the lim­its re­laxed.

A pair of Sen­ate Demo­crats last month urged EIA to probe the ef­fects of al­low­ing ex­ports.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×