Oil industry leader Jack Gerard said Wednesday that a recently released Transportation Department directive creates confusion over how to properly test and classify crude oil before rail transport.
“The emergency order says that we need to look at proper testing with sufficient frequency and quality. We don’t know what that means,” Gerard, the president of the American Petroleum Institute, said at a House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee hearing convened to examine passenger- and freight-rail safety.
The head of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Cynthia Quarterman, defended the order, saying that ambiguity was intentional so as not to force the industry’s hand.
“We specifically left those terms to be determined by the shippers,” Quarterman said. “We did not want to say for each and every instance before a shipment occurs that testing needed to occur.”
When shippers handle large quantities of crude sourced from the same shale play, they are typically familiar with its composition and may not need to test and reclassify the crude each time it’s loaded onto rail cars, Quarterman explained. In other instances, she said, shippers may need to test the crude more frequently if its composition is unknown or found not to be consistent.
“We are happy to talk with shippers that have questions and need clarification,” Quarterman said.
A spate of recent accidents involving crude oil sourced from North Dakota’s Bakken formation and shipped by rail has put crude-by-rail safety under the microscope. PHMSA in particular has taken heat for failing to finalize a rulemaking that would set revised tank-car standards for rail cars used to haul crude.
In response, the administration has issued a series of emergency orders aimed at boosting crude rail safety, including an order released on Tuesday mandating that shippers properly test and classify crude before shipment.
Gerard indicated, however, that the specifics of the order still need to be straightened out.
“The response we’ve gotten has been one of confusion,” he said, referring to how oil-industry stakeholders reacted to the order. “I think in light of this we need to sit down with the administrator and others and seek clarification on exactly what it is they would like us to do in light of this order.”
What We're Following See More »
Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”
"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.
"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."
"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.