Grijalva: GAO Set to Investigate Keystone Conflict

Arizona Democrat seeks probe of State Department contracting.

TUSCON, AZ - APRIL 24: U.S. Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) denounces Arizona's tough new immigration law on April 24, 2010 in Tuscon, Arizona. Grijalva, who shut his Tuscon office the day before because of death threats, called for an economic boycott of Arizona because of the new law, which he called racist. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clare Foran
Feb. 25, 2014, 10:44 a.m.

Rep. Raul Gri­jalva said Tues­day that the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice will audit of State De­part­ment pro­ced­ures for se­lect­ing con­tract­ors and en­sur­ing the cred­ib­il­ity of en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ments fol­low­ing al­leg­a­tions that the firm hired to re­view the pro­posed Key­stone XL pipeline had a con­flict of in­terest.

“We’re ask­ing the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice to look in­to all these fa­cets with­in the State De­part­ment, look at the con­flict is­sue “¦ noth­ing should be glossed over; noth­ing should be ig­nored,” Gri­jalva said Tues­day.

The Ari­zona Demo­crat sent a let­ter on Tues­day re­quest­ing the audit. A GAO spokes­man said that the let­ter has been re­ceived, but the of­fice has not yet reached a fi­nal de­cision on wheth­er or not to move for­ward with the re­view.

The State De­part­ment’s Of­fice of In­spect­or Gen­er­al is already con­duct­ing an in­quiry in­to a po­ten­tial con­flict of in­terest between En­vir­on­ment­al Re­sources Man­age­ment, the firm hired by State to carry out the en­vir­on­ment­al-im­pact as­sess­ment for Key­stone, and Tran­sCanada, the com­pany plan­ning to build the pipeline.

But Gri­jalva said a third-party in­vest­ig­a­tion is ne­ces­sary to en­sure ac­count­ab­il­ity.

“We have a tain­ted product on our hands,” Gri­jalva said. “A de­cision made on that in­form­a­tion is not only go­ing to be ques­tioned but its cred­ib­il­ity is go­ing to be zero.”

A fi­nal en­vir­on­ment­al-im­pact state­ment for the pro­ject was re­leased last month. It con­cluded that con­struc­tion of the pipeline would have a neg­li­gible im­pact on car­bon emis­sions.

Pres­id­ent Obama has said he will only ap­prove the pipeline, which would carry oil from Canada’s tar sands to U.S. re­finer­ies on the Gulf Coast, if it does not sig­ni­fic­antly add to at­mo­spher­ic levels of car­bon.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×