Some Smiles in Tough Times for Nuclear Power

Federal backing for the first new reactor in decades has given a lift to an industry that has lots of issues.

MIDDLETOWN, PA - MARCH 28: The Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant is seen in the early morning hours March 28, 2011 in Middletown, Pennsylvania. (Photo Jeff Fusco/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clare Foran
See more stories about...
Clare Foran
Feb. 21, 2014, 1:29 p.m.

Amid cheers over an ad­min­is­tra­tion de­cision to give fin­an­cial back­ing to a pair of nuc­le­ar re­act­ors, in­dustry boost­ers are quick to point out that the pres­id­ent’s re­cord on nuc­le­ar power is mixed.

“The ad­min­is­tra­tion has done some pos­it­ive things with re­spect to nuc­le­ar power. But we don’t agree with all of the de­cisions that have been made,” Richard My­ers, vice pres­id­ent for policy de­vel­op­ment at the Nuc­le­ar En­ergy In­sti­tute, a pro­nuc­lear lob­by­ing group, said in an in­ter­view.

So what makes it in­to the “pro” column when it comes time for the in­dustry to weigh in on ad­min­is­tra­tion policy?

To start, the pres­id­ent has lent sup­port to nuc­le­ar as part of his “all of the above” en­ergy policy, with En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz em­phas­iz­ing on more than one oc­ca­sion that nuc­le­ar is a key in­gredi­ent in plans to lower car­bon emis­sions across the coun­try.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has also backed nuc­le­ar with mon­et­ary muscle.

The En­ergy De­part­ment fi­nal­ized a loan guar­an­tee Wed­nes­day to the tune of $6.5 bil­lion dol­lars to fin­ance con­struc­tion of two nuc­le­ar re­act­ors at South­ern Com­pany’s Vo­gtle plant in Waynes­boro, Ga. Once com­plete, the re­act­ors will be the first to be built in the U.S. in three dec­ades.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has also doled out grants to sup­port nuc­le­ar R&D, in­clud­ing a $452 mil­lion fund ad­min­istered by DOE to help de­vel­op small mod­u­lar re­act­ors, a new gen­er­a­tion of re­act­ors the in­dustry hopes will prove less costly and more flex­ible than lar­ger power gen­er­at­ors.

All this sits re­l­at­ively well with the in­dustry. But there have also been policies that haven’t gone down as smoothly.

A ma­jor thorn in the in­dustry’s side is the very lit­er­ally ra­dio­act­ive prob­lem of what to do with nuc­le­ar waste from ex­ist­ing power plants — an is­sue the in­dustry sees as one largely cre­ated by Pres­id­ent Obama.

Dur­ing his first term in of­fice, Obama put a hold on con­struc­tion of a nuc­le­ar-waste stor­age site at Yucca Moun­tain in Nevada. Last sum­mer, a fed­er­al ap­peals court ruled that the Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion should pro­ceed with con­sid­er­a­tion of an ap­plic­a­tion to con­struct the re­pos­it­ory, but Yucca’s fate re­mains un­cer­tain. In the mean­time, nuc­le­ar waste is pil­ing up in in­ter­im stor­age fa­cil­it­ies across the coun­try.

“We don’t be­lieve Obama had the leg­al au­thor­ity or the sci­entif­ic basis to can­cel the Yucca pro­ject. We do not think that was the right move,” My­ers said.

Some in­dustry back­ers also find fault with the re­cently fi­nal­ized loan guar­an­tee.

The loan guar­an­tee “turned out not to be the game changer we had hoped,” said Mar­garet Hard­ing, a spokes­wo­man for the Amer­ic­an Nuc­le­ar So­ci­ety, a non­profit sci­ence and edu­ca­tion­al mem­ber­ship or­gan­iz­a­tion. “The re­act­ors were on track to be built any­way largely be­cause of state-level sup­port. So it could have been more ef­fect­ive for pro­jects that face a harder time get­ting off the ground to have re­ceived ad­min­is­tra­tion back­ing.”

One of the ma­jor reas­ons the in­dustry is fo­cused on ad­min­is­tra­tion policy is be­cause nuc­le­ar isn’t faring well in the free mar­ket. Most power com­pan­ies are opt­ing to build nat­ur­al-gas-fired plants over nuc­le­ar and oth­er forms of fuel such as coal due to the re­l­at­ively low cost of con­struc­tion and the low price of nat­ur­al gas. As a res­ult, if nuc­le­ar needs a boost, in­dustry is look­ing to states and the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to provide it.

Crit­ics of nuc­le­ar power warn, however, that dif­fi­cult hurdles re­main.

“Nuc­le­ar can’t com­pete with nat­ur­al gas, and it’s also go­ing to have a hard time com­pet­ing with re­new­ables,” said Mi­chael Mari­otte, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the non­profit Nuc­le­ar In­form­a­tion and Re­source Ser­vice, an an­ti­nuc­lear watch­dog group. “What we’re see­ing with dis­trib­uted gen­er­a­tion like sol­ar is a new mod­el for elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion and de­ploy­ment, and it’s a mod­el where large base-load forms of power gen­er­a­tion like nuc­le­ar just don’t have as large of a role to play.”

What We're Following See More »
AND VICE VERSA
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
4 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Source:
IF HE’LL JUST LISTEN…
Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
21 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
INCLUDING CLINTON
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Source:
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
×