The prospects for climate legislation seem so grim that few Democrats even talk about bringing a bill to the floor these days.
But Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat and self-described “climate hawk,” has a theory about why the political calculus will change in the not-too-distant future.
He sees a window opening in 2015 or 2016 to move a bill that sets fees on carbon emissions, and he offered a political road map on Wednesday night.
“I am very confident that we can win a lot sooner than people think,” Whitehouse said on a troop-rallying call with activists hosted by Organizing for Action, the advocacy group that sprang from President Obama’s reelection campaign.
Whitehouse is offering a contrarian view. Cap-and-trade legislation collapsed in the Senate in 2010, and big climate proposals have been in a deep freeze ever since.
So why is he optimistic that a big vote swing is possible? One reason is the Environmental Protection Agency’s looming carbon-emissions regulations for power plants.
“When those big power plants are going to face serious EPA regulation, for their owners, suddenly, yeah, maybe a carbon fee doesn’t look like such a bad deal,” Whitehouse said.
He believes various other pieces are falling into place that, combined with a sustained push from activists, could make legislation a reality.
Those pieces, he said on the call, include more big corporations coming around on climate and stepped-up political work by groups like the League of Conservation Voters.
Whitehouse also argues that public opinion — including among young Republicans — is shifting fast enough that the GOP can’t possibly field a climate “denier” as their 2016 presidential candidate.
That means congressional Republicans will move toward the center to provide cover for their standard-bearer, theorizes Whitehouse, who is part of a new coalition of Senate Democrats trying to play offense on climate change.
“Put all of those things together, and I think we have a real chance to have a good carbon bill come through Congress after this [midterm] election and before the presidential [election], in 2015 or 2016,” Whitehouse told the Organizing for Action activists on Wednesday’s call.
What We're Following See More »
The Federal Open Market Committee today voted to leave interest rates alone, but "upgraded its assessment of the economy’s recent performance and said near-term risks to the outlook have diminished, effectively leaving the door open to raise rates later this year, possibly as early as September."
"Spurred by VP pick Mike Pence, a former congressman with close ties to many lawmakers, the Trump campaign in recent weeks has stepped up its courtship of wary Capitol Hill Republicans. And the efforts appear to be bearing fruit." Central to the charm offensive: invitations to more than a dozen "Senate and House members into his family’s private box for some power-schmoozing with him and his kids" during the Republican National Convention.
Donald Trump essentially encouraged more Russian espionage against Democrats in a press conference this morning. "Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” he said. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” That prompted Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker Paul Ryan to say: “Russia is a global menace led by a devious thug. Putin should stay out of this election.”
Investigations are never far from the Clintons, and here's another: At the behest of "dozens" of Republican lawmakers, the IRS is opening a fraud investigation into the Clinton Foundation."The move signals a shift from the IRS's announcement last year that it would not look into allegations of financial irregularities at the well-connected charity."
"Bickering commissioners, ineffective managers and lousy internal communication rank among the top reasons why the Federal Election Commission" has some of the worst morale in the federal government. That's the conclusion of an inspector general's report, which put "the most blame on the FEC’s six commissioners: three Democratic appointees and three Republican appointees who have regularly criticized one another and frequently (but not exclusively) deadlocked on high-profile political issues before them."