A bipartisan coalition of senators is pressuring the Obama administration to do away with proposed cuts to the renewable-fuel standard, a federal mandate requiring set amounts of biofuels to be mixed into the fuel supply each year.
Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Al Franken, D-Minn., Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and 27 other senators sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy on Thursday asking the agency to amend a proposal for the standard released in November that would lower the total renewable volume obligations for the first time in the mandate’s history.
The proposal has generated heated debate as biofuels supporters oppose any cuts to the standard. The oil industry and others, meanwhile, have lauded EPA for acknowledging its effort to scale back the mandate.
The senators, for their part, are siding with the biofuels industry and warn that a decision to scale-back the mandate would increase American reliance on foreign sources of fossil fuels and freeze investment in the renewable-fuel industry, leading to a loss of jobs for those employed by the industry.
“Congress passed the RFS to increase the amount of renewable fuel utilized in our nation’s fuel supply,” the letter states, adding: “The administration’s proposal is a significant step backward — undermining the goal of increasing biofuels production as a domestic alternative to foreign oil consumption.”
Also on Thursday, EPA sent letters to the American Petroleum Institute, the largest trade association for the U.S. oil and natural-gas industry, and the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, a trade association representing fuel manufacturers, granting requests by both organizations for the agency to reconsider its cellulosic biofuels standard in the 2013 mandate on the grounds that the target amounts of cellulosic biofuels determined by last year’s mandate are unrealistic and unachievable.
EPA’s announcement that it will take a second look at the 2013 cellulosic target is likely to further open the door for opponents of the RFS to push for changes to the mandate.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"