Green Groups to Obama: Choose Climate Over Oil

President Barack Obama walks past an oil rig during his visit to oil and gas production fields located on federal lands outside of Maljamar, N.M., Wednesday, March, 21, 2012.   
National Journal
Ben Geman
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Jan. 17, 2014, 2:57 a.m.

Ma­jor en­vir­on­ment­al groups are press­ing the White House to ditch its “all of the above” en­ergy ap­proach that backs ex­pan­ded do­mest­ic oil drilling along­side the green en­ergy sources that act­iv­ists em­brace.

The new polit­ic­al pres­sure — signaled in an open let­ter from more than a dozen groups — shows that en­vir­on­ment­al­ists be­lieve Pres­id­ent Obama’s care­fully cal­ib­rated en­ergy strategy isn’t weighted enough to­ward bat­tling cli­mate change.

“We be­lieve that con­tin­ued re­li­ance on an ‘all of the above’ en­ergy strategy would be fun­da­ment­ally at odds with your goal of cut­ting car­bon pol­lu­tion and would un­der­mine our na­tion’s ca­pa­city to re­spond to the threat of cli­mate dis­rup­tion,” states the let­ter re­leased Thursday even­ing.

Groups in­clud­ing the Si­erra Club, Earthjustice, the En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund, the Na­tion­al Wild­life Fed­er­a­tion, the League of Con­ser­va­tion Voters, and the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil signed the let­ter.

“We be­lieve that a cli­mate im­pact lens should be ap­plied to all de­cisions re­gard­ing new fossil fuel de­vel­op­ment, and urge that a ‘car­bon-re­du­cing clean en­ergy’ strategy rather than an ‘all of the above’ strategy be­come the op­er­at­ive paradigm for your ad­min­is­tra­tion’s en­ergy de­cisions,” the let­ter states.

The Wash­ing­ton Post first re­por­ted on the let­ter Thursday even­ing.

Green groups have wel­comed Obama’s second-term fo­cus on cli­mate change, which in­cludes car­bon-emis­sions stand­ards for power plants.

But they’re also wary of the White House ap­proach on al­low­ing drilling in Arc­tic wa­ters and oth­er policies.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×