Oil-Train Crashes Spur Safety Scrutiny

None

Scorched oil tankers remain on July 10, 2013 at the train derailment site in Lac-Megantic, Quebec. Edward Bukhardt, CEO of Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railways Inc.,(MMA) told reporters Wednesday that the train was left running while the engineer spent the night sleeping in a hotel in Nantes, adding that the engineer was following standard 'industry practice.' The train carrying crude oil from North Dakota derailed in the town of Lac-Megantic overnight Friday, causing a massive fire and explosions that killedat least 15 people, with another 45 still missing.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Jan. 3, 2014, 3:12 a.m.

Rail-safety ad­voc­ates and mem­bers of Con­gress are call­ing for stricter tank-car safety stand­ards in the wake of a ma­jor oil-by-rail ac­ci­dent this week, an ap­peal that took on new ur­gency Thursday with the re­lease of a fed­er­al ad­vis­ory that oil from North Dakota’s Bakken form­a­tion may be more flam­mable than oth­er types of crude.

A train car­ry­ing crude oil from the Bakken ran off the rails near Cas­selton, N.D., on Monday, lead­ing to a vol­un­tary evac­u­ation of nearby res­id­ents. The ac­ci­dent oc­curred when freight cars car­ry­ing crude oil struck a train that had de­railed earli­er in the day. No in­jur­ies were re­por­ted but the crash sparked an in­ferno and re­ignited con­cerns over the po­ten­tial dangers of ship­ping oil by rail.

The event is the latest in a series of ac­ci­dents in­volving rail trans­port of crude in re­cent months and has spurred a re­newed push for over­sight and reg­u­la­tion of rail cars trav­el­ing to and from oil-rich states.

“We be­lieve the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment needs to act to im­prove stand­ards for the design and con­struc­tion of tank cars,” said Patti Re­illy of the As­so­ci­ation of Amer­ic­an Rail­roads, a trade group for ma­jor North Amer­ic­an freight rail­roads. “It is our hope that they step up and de­mand the safest tank car pos­sible both for new con­struc­tion and for ret­ro­fit­ting of the ex­ist­ing fleet.”

With do­mest­ic oil-pro­duc­tion sur­ging due to ad­vances in drilling tech­niques, oil-by-rail ship­ments have ex­pan­ded ex­po­nen­tially. This has caused pro­ponents of stricter rail-safety stand­ards to step up ef­forts to spur re­form. De­bate con­tin­ues, however, over which branch of gov­ern­ment should take the lead in tight­en­ing stand­ards.

A few months after a train car­ry­ing North Dakota crude de­railed in Lac-Megant­ic, Que­bec, in Ju­ly, the Trans­port­a­tion De­part­ment’s Pipeline and Haz­ard­ous Ma­ter­i­als Safety Ad­min­is­tra­tion is­sued an ad­vance no­tice of pro­posed rule­mak­ing to strengthen reg­u­la­tions for rail trans­port of haz­ard­ous ma­ter­i­als. And on Thursday, PHMSA cir­cu­lated a safety alert that Bakken crude may be more likely than oth­er vari­et­ies of crude to ig­nite in the event of a rail crash.

“Rail safety is a na­tion­al pri­or­ity, and we have been ag­gress­ively tak­ing ac­tion on mul­tiple fronts to mit­ig­ate risks,” said Jean­nie Shif­fer, a Trans­port­a­tion De­part­ment spokes­wo­man. “[As the] rule­mak­ing moves for­ward, we will con­tin­ue tak­ing ac­tion whenev­er ne­ces­sary to en­sure the safe trans­port­a­tion of haz­ard­ous ma­ter­i­als by rail.”

But fed­er­al reg­u­lat­ory re­form will take a long time to crys­tal­lize, and law­makers are look­ing to fill the void.

“Right now, we have slow-mov­ing fed­er­al bur­eau­cracy and ma­jor push­back from private in­vestors who own the rail cars, and both those things add up to a need for con­gres­sion­al ac­tion,” Rep. Peter De­Fazio, D-Ore., a mem­ber of the House Trans­port­a­tion and In­fra­struc­ture Sub­com­mit­tee on Rail­roads, Pipelines, and Haz­ard­ous Ma­ter­i­als, said in an in­ter­view Thursday. “First, Con­gress should man­date that with­in a cer­tain peri­od of time you can’t use a DOT-111 car [com­monly used to trans­port crude oil] that hasn’t been ret­ro­fit­ted, and that would be a short-term solu­tion while we de­cide on a new, bet­ter design for these cars; and then that new design would be man­dated along with a phaseout of the old cars.”

De­Fazio ac­know­ledged a dif­fi­cult road ahead, though. “I don’t think Con­gress has the where­with­al to man­date the new design, but I cer­tainly in­tend to ask for hear­ings on this is­sue,” he said. “That’s all I can do.”

On the oth­er side of Cap­it­ol Hill, a spokes­man for the Sen­ate Com­merce, Sci­ence, and Trans­port­a­tion Com­mit­tee said Chair­man Jay Rock­e­feller, D-W.Va., is mon­it­or­ing the is­sue.

“The series of re­cent de­rail­ments and ser­i­ous ac­ci­dents in­volving crude oil is alarm­ing and de­mands closer scru­tiny,” the spokes­man said. “Re­gard­less of how crude is shipped, Sen­at­or Rock­e­feller be­lieves that it must be done in the safest man­ner pos­sible.”

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×