China, U.S. Key to Global Warming Pact

President Obama meets with then-Prime Minister of Australia Kevin Rudd in the Oval office of the White House in Washington on March 24, 2009.
National Journal
Amy Harder
Dec. 13, 2013, 7:07 a.m.

China and the United States must lead to­geth­er if the plan­et wants to mean­ing­fully ad­dress cli­mate change, Aus­tralia’s former prime min­is­ter, Kev­in Rudd, said last week, and he’s hope­ful that it’s pos­sible.

“The real op­por­tun­ity lies in, frankly, bridging the Pa­cific,” Rudd said after a brief­ing with journ­al­ists in Wash­ing­ton last week. “As un­real as that may sound to some, if you look at the in­tens­ity of the do­mest­ic cli­mate-change ac­tions un­der­taken by the Chinese in the last year or two, their po­s­i­tions in terms of real ac­tion has changed dra­mat­ic­ally.”

Rudd stepped down as prime min­is­ter of Aus­tralia in Septem­ber after briefly win­ning back the po­s­i­tion from pre­de­cessor Ju­lia Gil­lard just nine weeks earli­er. He was also prime min­is­ter from 2007 to 2010.

While lead­ing the coun­try, Rudd made cli­mate change a pri­or­ity, and he con­siders it a sig­ni­fic­ant glob­al is­sue. “Cli­mate change doesn’t go away simply be­cause it’s not in the head­lines,” Rudd said. “It’s hap­pen­ing. It’s evolving.”¦ It’s in­con­tro­vert­ible.”

Like lead­ers in the U.S. and many oth­er coun­tries, Rudd dif­fers with oth­er Aus­trali­an lead­ers on how, ex­actly, to ad­dress the prob­lem. He faced cri­ti­cism for his ef­forts to re­place the car­bon-tax re­gime that Gil­lard had put in place with a cap-and-trade sys­tem. Aus­tralia’s new prime min­is­ter, Tony Ab­bott, is now in the pro­cess of ab­ol­ish­ing any gov­ern­ment re­gi­men to re­duce car­bon emis­sions.

This de­bate is im­port­ant bey­ond Aus­tralia, be­cause many coun­tries, in­clud­ing the United States, are de­bat­ing how best to cut car­bon emis­sions. After Con­gress tried but failed to pass a cap-and-trade plan, Pres­id­ent Obama is push­ing ahead with reg­u­la­tions to con­trol car­bon emis­sions from dif­fer­ent parts of the eco­nomy. The idea of a car­bon tax, while ap­peal­ing to eco­nom­ists and en­vir­on­ment­al­ists alike, is con­sidered too polit­ic­ally con­tro­ver­sial to gain much trac­tion on Cap­it­ol Hill right now.

In­deed, Ab­bott made re­peal­ing Gil­lard’s car­bon tax, which Rudd didn’t have a chance to re­place with a cap-and-trade sys­tem giv­en his short time in of­fice, a sig­na­ture piece of his elec­tion cam­paign, ac­cord­ing to Aus­trali­an me­dia out­lets. He also op­ted not to send any elec­ted mem­bers to the United Na­tions’ cli­mate-change ne­go­ti­ations last month in Po­land.

U.N. ne­go­ti­at­ors set a tar­get of 2015, when they meet in Par­is for the an­nu­al con­fer­ence, to hash out a glob­al deal.

“This is really the last chance to ef­fect­ively bring it about,” Rudd said of a deal. “The po­ten­tial lies with China and the United States to reach a new un­der­stand­ing on wheth­er they can in fact to­geth­er break the glob­al dead­lock.”

China and the U.S. to­geth­er ac­count for 42 per­cent of total glob­al car­bon emis­sions, ac­cord­ing to the In­ter­na­tion­al En­ergy Agency.

Rudd praised Obama’s com­mit­ment to the is­sue, but ac­know­ledged that he’s lim­ited by what he can do.

“The ad­min­is­tra­tion is do­ing as well as it can do­mest­ic­ally,” Rudd said. “I think the pres­id­ent stated quite clearly in his first State of the Uni­on upon his reelec­tion that this is a pri­or­ity to him. We’ve seen evid­ence of his ad­min­is­tra­tion ne­go­ti­at­ing.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
20 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×