Keystone Backers Alarmed by John Podesta’s Move to White House

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 24: Center for American Progress co-founder John Podesta moderates a panel discussion during a conference commemorating the 10th anniversary of the center at the Astor Ballroom of the St. Regis Hotel October 24, 2013 in Washington, DC. Former Clinton Administration Chief of Staff Podesta co-founded the liberal public policy research and advocacy organization as a think tank that rivals conservative policy groups, such as the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Ben Geman Amy Harder
Dec. 10, 2013, 10:12 a.m.

Sen. John Ho­even, R-N.D., an out­spoken ad­voc­ate of the Key­stone XL pipeline, isn’t thrilled to hear that prom­in­ent Demo­crat­ic strategist John Podesta has form­ally joined Pres­id­ent Obama’s in­ner circle at the White House.

Podesta’s think tank, the Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress, has been bat­tling the pro­posed pipeline, and Podesta him­self has been crit­ic­al of the pro­ject for years. 

“It cre­ates a con­cern,” Ho­even told Na­tion­al Journ­al in the Cap­it­ol.

“The White House has delayed this for now more than five years,” Ho­even said. “It looks to me if they can find a way to turn it down, that is what they are go­ing to do, which is why I am go­ing to con­tin­ue to do everything I can to put pres­sure on them to get them to ap­prove it.”

On the oth­er side of the aisle, Sen. Bar­bara Box­er, D-Cal­if., op­poses Key­stone and hailed Podesta’s de­cision to join the White House. But she down­played any link between Podesta’s pres­ence and Obama’s even­tu­al de­cision on the pipeline.

“When it comes to policy, the pres­id­ent sets the policy. The people he has around him carry it out and work with us to make sure that we carry it out. Really it is not about what John Podesta thinks about an is­sue, it’s more: how much John Podesta is go­ing to help this pres­id­ent cre­ate his leg­acy for a second term,” said Box­er, chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee.

“He has ex­per­i­ence, he knows how this place works, he has broad know­ledge on so many sub­jects,” Box­er told re­port­ers in the Cap­it­ol.

Dan Weiss, seni­or fel­low at CAP, warned on Twit­ter not to read too much in­to Podesta’s op­pos­i­tion to the pro­ject.  “Podesta op­poses Key­stone but he will be an hon­est broker,” Weiss said. 

The New York Times on Monday night first re­por­ted that Podesta, who was Pres­id­ent Clin­ton’s chief of staff, will work on the rol­lout of Obama’s troubled health care law and oth­er top­ics, in­clud­ing cli­mate change.

Three years ago in a speech to a con­fer­ence in Canada, Podesta spoke at length about why he’s crit­ic­al of the Key­stone XL pipeline and de­vel­op­ment of oil sands more gen­er­ally. The pipeline would carry oil from Canada’s tar sands to U.S. re­finer­ies on the Gulf Coast.

He said in or­der for coun­tries to re­duce their car­bon emis­sions by 80 per­cent by 2050, the goal shouldn’t be to just re­duce the car­bon foot­print of oil sands pro­duc­tion — which is en­ergy-in­tens­ive and pro­duces more green­house gases than tra­di­tion­al oil pro­duc­tion — it should be to get off oil al­to­geth­er.

“Set­ting a goal of lower­ing oil sands emis­sions to come in­to line with con­ven­tion­al oil pro­duc­tion is the wrong goal,” Podesta said. “Oil sands can’t simply be as good as con­ven­tion­al oil. We need to re­duce fossil fuel use and ac­cel­er­ate the trans­ition to clean­er tech­no­lo­gies, in the trans­port­a­tion sec­tor and else­where.”

His com­ments on cli­mate change as they re­late to Key­stone are par­tic­u­larly im­port­ant since Obama in June said he would only ap­prove the pipeline if it didn’t sig­ni­fic­antly ex­acer­bate glob­al warm­ing.

“We either rap­idly green the world’s en­gine of eco­nom­ic growth, or we suf­fer the con­sequences that are very dif­fi­cult to even fully com­pre­hend, in ad­di­tion to those we already tol­er­ate,” Podesta said. “Un­con­ven­tion­al sources of fossil fuels can­not be our en­ergy fu­ture,” Podesta said.

En­vir­on­ment­al groups cheered Podesta’s re­turn to the White House.

“John sees the in­trins­ic value of our pub­lic lands and forests, knows the danger of our re­li­ance on dirty fuels like tar sands, and re­cog­nizes cli­mate dis­rup­tion as one of the most press­ing chal­lenges of our time — and he’s taken ac­tion to find solu­tions,” said Si­erra Club Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or Mi­chael Brune.

In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journ­al in Janu­ary 2012, Podesta and Tom Stey­er, a bil­lion­aire en­vir­on­ment­al­ist, soun­ded bullish on an­oth­er kind of un­con­ven­tion­al fossil fuel: nat­ur­al gas, which faces cri­ti­cism from many en­vir­on­ment­al groups in­clud­ing the Si­erra Club. The na­tion’s largest en­vir­on­ment­al group wants the U.S. to start wean­ing it­self off nat­ur­al gas today.

“After a four-dec­ade de­cline in oil pro­duc­tion, the U.S. is now pro­du­cing more than half of our oil do­mest­ic­ally,” Podesta and Stey­er wrote in The Journ­al. “This can free us from our ad­dic­tion to for­eign-sourced bar­rels, par­tic­u­larly if we util­ize our dra­mat­ic­ally lar­ger and cheap­er nat­ur­al-gas re­serves.”

“There are crit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment­al ques­tions as­so­ci­ated with de­vel­op­ing these re­sources, par­tic­u­larly con­cern­ing meth­ane leak­age and wa­ter pol­lu­tion,” the two wrote. “Yet as long as we en­sure high reg­u­lat­ory stand­ards and stay away from the ris­ki­est and most pol­lut­ing of these activ­it­ies, we can safely as­semble a col­lec­tion of lower-car­bon, af­ford­able, and abund­ant do­mest­ic-en­ergy as­sets that will dra­mat­ic­ally im­prove our eco­nomy and our en­vir­on­ment.”

Stey­er and Podesta were crit­ic­al of be­com­ing more de­pend­ent on for­eign oil, a trend the Key­stone XL pipeline may fur­ther in­cent. “Our eco­nomy can go from be­ing weighed down by oil im­ports to soar­ing ahead, powered in­creas­ingly by do­mest­ic­ally pro­duced clean en­ergy, and en­ergy ser­vices and tech­no­logy,” they wrote.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×