Battle Widens Over ‘Gas Rush’ Climate Footprint

An employee checks piping in the main turbine hall at the EON AG gas fired power station on the Isle of Grain, U.K., on Thursday, Oct. 4, 2012. The National Grid Plc and E.ON have worked together to link two plants with twin pipelines, allowing surplus heat from electricity generation at E.ON.s power station to heat LNG and convert it back to gas. Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images
National Journal
Ben Geman
Dec. 6, 2013, 2:33 p.m.

Nat­ur­al gas ad­voc­ates are fa­cing fresh cri­ti­cism about the fuel’s cli­mate foot­print, even as gas-fired power plants snag mar­ket share from coal units that emit vastly more car­bon.

Gas crit­ics have ar­gued in re­cent years that leaks of meth­ane — a po­tent green­house gas — from pro­duc­tion wells risk sub­stan­tially off­set­ting the car­bon ad­vant­age gas holds over coal.

And now a new study is rais­ing a sep­ar­ate set of ques­tions about the cli­mate foot­print of the U.S. nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion boom.

The En­vir­on­ment­al In­teg­rity Pro­ject (EIP) re­port looks at green­house-gas emis­sions from big in­fra­struc­ture and in­dus­tri­al pro­jects that are crop­ping up along­side sur­ging U.S. gas pro­duc­tion.

“The shale gas boom has un­leashed a tid­al wave of pro­pos­als to build new com­pressors and pipelines, and ex­pand chem­ic­al, fer­til­izer, and pet­ro­leum plants that de­pend on nat­ur­al gas for feed­stock or fuel,” the re­port states.

“Since Janu­ary 1, 2012, these in­dus­tries have pro­posed or already ob­tained Clean Air Act per­mits that au­thor­ize a 91 mil­lion ton in­crease in green­house gas emis­sions — as much as the out­put from twenty large (500 mega­watt) coal-fired power plants,” adds the study titled “Gas Rush: In­creas­ing Green­house Gas Emis­sions from New Oil, Gas and Chem­ic­al Plants.”

To be sure, EIP isn’t claim­ing that these emis­sions neg­ate the ad­vant­age of gas-fired power plants that emit roughly half as much car­bon di­ox­ide as coal-fired plants.

In­deed EIP pre­dicts the emis­sions from the vari­ous planned gas-re­lated in­fra­struc­ture pro­jects they sur­veyed, such as li­que­fied-nat­ur­al-gas ter­min­als and chem­ic­al plants that use nat­ur­al gas, would be the equi­val­ent of 10 gigawatts of coal-fired power gen­er­a­tion.

That’s a lot few­er coal gigawatts than ana­lysts pre­dict will be re­tired in com­ing years — due in part to com­pet­i­tion from low-cost gas and in part to Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion air-pol­lu­tion rules.

A late 2012 re­port by the Brattle Group fore­casts that 59 to 77 gigawatts of coal-plant ca­pa­city will be moth­balled over the next five years, while a re­cent Re­u­ters ana­lys­is is less ag­gress­ive, pre­dict­ing about 46 gigawatts of re­tire­ments over 10 years.

And the growth of nat­ur­al-gas-fired elec­tri­city plants at coal’s ex­pense has helped cut U.S. en­ergy-re­lated car­bon emis­sions to their low­est level since 1994, ac­cord­ing to the fed­er­al En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

But the EIP re­port notes that the build-out of oth­er gas-re­lated or gas-en­abled in­fra­struc­ture means these power-sec­tor cli­mate ad­vant­ages will be “par­tially off­set by high­er emis­sions from oth­er in­dus­tries cash­ing in on cheap and abund­ant sup­plies of oil and gas from shale de­pos­its.”

EIP Dir­ect­or Eric Schaef­fer said the re­port shows the need for ex­pan­ded green­house-gas reg­u­la­tions bey­ond the power-plant stand­ards the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency is craft­ing.

“The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion ap­proaches its sixth year without hav­ing even pro­posed green­house-gas stand­ards for the nat­ur­al gas, chem­ic­al, or re­fin­ing sec­tors, al­though a re­view of per­mits in­dic­ates that emis­sions are es­cal­at­ing rap­idly from all three in­dus­tries. Time is run­ning out for ac­tion,” he said in a state­ment.

An oil-and-gas-in­dustry spokes­man de­fen­ded the U.S. nat­ur­al-gas boom.

“The facts are the facts. The United States is lead­ing the world in re­duced emis­sions while at the same time it is the No. 1 pro­du­cer of nat­ur­al gas in the world. It is cre­at­ing jobs and bil­lions of dol­lars rev­en­ue for the gov­ern­ment at the time that it needs it the most,” said Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute spokes­man Eric Wohlschle­gel.

Gas ad­voc­ates have also fiercely pushed back against the cri­ti­cisms over meth­ane, and they have an ally in En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz, who has said re­peatedly that meth­ane emis­sions won’t neg­ate the fuel’s car­bon ad­vant­ages.

But the new EIP re­port shows that as the U.S. nat­ur­al-gas boom con­tin­ues, the in­dustry’s role in cli­mate policy will re­main con­tested ter­rain.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×