White House to Extend Energy-Efficiency Initiative

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 27: U.S. Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) (L) speaks as Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC) (R) listens during a news conference on Syria June 27, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The legislators held a news conference on S.1201 and H.R.2494, bills to 'restrict funds related to escalating United States military involvement in Syria.'
National Journal
Clare Foran
Dec. 3, 2013, 9:25 a.m.

Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are join­ing hands back­ing en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency pro­grams, and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is tak­ing no­tice.

The White House an­nounced Tues­day that it will ex­tend a pres­id­en­tial memor­andum call­ing on fed­er­al agen­cies to achieve $2 bil­lion in en­ergy sav­ings dur­ing a two-year peri­od.

The ini­ti­at­ive, which has led agen­cies to identi­fy an es­tim­ated $2.3 bil­lion in sav­ings through the im­ple­ment­a­tion of en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency meas­ures in fed­er­al build­ings, began in 2011 and was set to ex­pire this year. The pro­gram will now con­tin­ue through 2016.

The de­cision ar­rives amid a groundswell of sup­port in Con­gress for en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency ef­forts.

Last month, Reps. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Cory Gard­ner, R-Colo., led a bi­par­tis­an co­ali­tion of 118 House mem­bers and 28 sen­at­ors in a re­quest that the pres­id­ent ex­tend the ini­ti­at­ive. In a let­ter, the co­ali­tion asked the White House to grant a five-year, $5 bil­lion ex­ten­sion of the pro­gram.

Welch and Gard­ner have also in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion that would dir­ect agen­cies to enter in­to $1 bil­lion worth of per­form­ance con­tracts an­nu­ally for five years to boost ef­fi­ciency in fed­er­al build­ings.

Re­act­ing to the news that the pres­id­ent would ex­tend the ini­ti­at­ive, Welch ap­plauded the de­cision but com­men­ted that the ex­ec­ut­ive branch’s ef­fort should be paired with le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion. He also said he will work with Gard­ner to press the ad­min­is­tra­tion for a spe­cified tar­get amount in sav­ings.

“The White House ini­ti­at­ive needs to have a spe­cif­ic goal,” Welch said. “A con­crete goal tends to get bet­ter res­ults and it’s much more likely to suc­ceed if we have both a con­crete goal and a le­gis­lat­ive com­mit­ment as well.”

Welch also said he be­lieves the pres­id­ent’s de­cision will in­crease mo­mentum to pass an en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill in Con­gress. “It’s great to see the ad­min­is­tra­tion sig­nal­ing its com­mit­ment to this is­sue. We have the White House back­ing this and we have broad bi­par­tis­an sup­port which is really rare to see right now,” he com­men­ted.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×