Cap-and-trade legislation is long dead in Congress, but Northeastern states are pressing the Environmental Protection Agency to keep the concept alive elsewhere.
The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative — nine states that have a regional power-plant emissions cap — want EPA to let them use the system to meet federal carbon-emissions rules for existing plants.
And the rules that EPA will float in draft form next June should let other states take the same road, RGGI argues in a new letter to the agency.
“Our experience with RGGI demonstrates that regional cooperation can achieve the most cost-effective emission reductions, enable a transition to a lower-emitting and more-efficient power sector, and create economic benefits and jobs across the United States,” its Monday letter to EPA says. “We urge EPA to recognize these multiple benefits of RGGI, allow our states to use RGGI as a compliance mechanism, and encourage other states to follow suit by participating in RGGI or other regional programs.”
The state in the RGGI, such as New York and Maryland, have already cut their joint electricity-sector emissions by more than 40 percent since 2005, according to the letter, which credits the cap-and-trade system and other green-energy programs.
Cap-and-trade will ensure the regional power sector emissions are 50 percent below 2005 levels in 2020, adds RGGI, which was established in 2005. Its pollution cap took effect about five years ago.
In addition to the RGGI states, California has implemented its own cap-and-trade program for greenhouse-gas emissions from a wider array of industrial sources.
The RGGI letter is one of several recent efforts to encourage EPA to give states lots of running room when crafting rules for existing plants — perhaps the most far-reaching piece of President Obama’s second-term climate plan.
Under the Clean Air Act section EPA is using, called 111(d), federal regulators set enforceable guidelines and states craft plans to meet them.
In November, a group of state power regulators — called the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners — passed a resolution calling for “sufficiently flexible compliance pathways or mechanisms that recognize state and regional variations to achieve the most cost-effective emissions reductions in each state.”
And Adele Morris, a Brookings Institution economist and climate expert, is pressing EPA to give states the option of meeting the standards with an excise tax on carbon emissions from power plants.
The early positioning reflects the reach of the upcoming EPA rules. Power plants—especially coal-fired power plants—are the largest single unregulated source of U.S. carbon emissions.
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, speaking at the liberal Center for American Progress Monday, said EPA would give states “significant flexibility” under the rules.
As EPA gets closer to issuing draft rules, look for more efforts by states to win plenty of leeway from the regulators.
And RGGI, for its part, is using its new letter to EPA as more than just a sales pitch for cap-and-trade.
The northeastern states also want credit for what they’ve already done.
“EPA should avoid any approach that imposes inequitable or disproportionate burdens on early mover states and fails to recognize their substantial progress,” the letter said.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."