The CIA Fears the Internet of Things

The battleground of tomorrow is everywhere at once.

National Journal
Patrick Tucker, Defense One
See more stories about...
Patrick Tucker, Defense One
July 25, 2014, 11:57 a.m.

The ma­jor themes de­fin­ing geo-se­cur­ity for the com­ing dec­ades were ex­plored at a for­um on “The Fu­ture of War­fare” at the As­pen Se­cur­ity For­um on Thursday, mod­er­ated by De­fense One Ex­ec­ut­ive Ed­it­or Kev­in Bar­on.

Dawn Mey­er­riecks, the deputy dir­ect­or of the Cent­ral In­tel­li­gence Agency’s dir­ect­or­ate of sci­ence and tech­no­logy, said today’s con­cerns about cy­ber war don’t ad­dress the loom­ing geo-se­cur­ity threats posed by the In­ter­net of Things, the em­bed­ding of com­puters, sensors, and In­ter­net cap­ab­il­it­ies in­to more and more phys­ic­al ob­jects.

“Smart re­fri­ger­at­ors have been used in dis­trib­uted deni­al of ser­vice at­tacks,” she said. At least one smart fridge played a role in a massive spam at­tack last year, in­volving more than 100,000 in­ter­net-con­nec­ted devices and more than 750,000 spam emails. She also men­tioned “smart fluor­es­cent LEDs [that are] are com­mu­nic­at­ing that they need to be re­placed but are also be­ing hi­jacked for oth­er things.”

“The mer­ger of phys­ic­al and vir­tu­al is really where it’s at. If we don’t grok that then we’ve got huge prob­lems,” she said. Grok, a ref­er­ence to Robert A. Hein­lein’s 1961 nov­el Stranger in a Strange Land, de­scribes the tele­path­ic com­mu­nion of thoughts, feel­ings, and fears.

Smart cloth­ing, she said, could cre­ate se­cur­ity and ac­cess prob­lems, spe­cific­ally for the CIA. The same tech­no­lo­gies that could al­low mil­lions to bet­ter mon­it­or and man­age their health could cre­ate a trans­par­ency and work­place prob­lems that “Idon’t want to have to deal with.”

It has a sort of sci­ence-fic­tion­al flare, but Mey­er­riecks says there’s no ex­cuse for be­ing caught off-guard by tech­no­lo­gic­al events, or “punc­tu­at­ing tech­no­lo­gic­al dis­rup­tions” that are clearly vis­ible in trends today.

“The mer­ger of bio­lo­gic­al and cy­ber, those will be viewed as dis­ruptors al­though we all know they’ve been in­ves­ted in for dec­ades at this point. When someone fi­nally fig­ures out how to pro­duct­ize it in a way.” By way of an ex­ample, she brought up the cell phone, “When it goes from the brick to something I can’t leave my house without, then it’s dis­rupt­ive.”

In many ways that day has already ar­rived. Dick Cheney, formerU.S. Vice Pres­id­ent, told 60 Minutes that he had a wire­less pace­maker in­stalled in his chest in 2007 that would have al­lowed his doc­tor to mon­it­or his heart, on­line. He didn’t en­able the BlueTooth broad­cast­ing fea­ture for fear of it be­ing hacked. We have a hard enough time se­cur­ing com­puters on desks. We may already face the risk of an en­tire gen­er­a­tion of baby boomers be­com­ing vul­ner­able to leth­al cy­ber at­tacks be­cause of In­ter­net-en­abled med­ic­al devices.

Here are some oth­er takeaways from the dis­cus­sion:

The Eco­nom­ic War Is Afoot

When asked if the United States was already en­gaged in an eco­nom­ic war, with in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­erty as the prize, Mey­er­riecks re­spon­ded that “Ab­so­lutely, this the case.” That’s evid­ent in the fact that the U.S. is now su­ing five mem­bers of the Chinese mil­it­ary for what amounts to in­dus­tri­al es­pi­on­age, steal­ing trade secrets for per­son­al profit. It’s a law­suit against in­di­vidu­als, but the Chinese gov­ern­ment, as a whole, took it per­son­ally and sus­pen­ded par­ti­cip­a­tion in a joint China-U.S.cy­ber-se­cur­ity work­ing group.

Quantum Com­put­ing Won’t Save You

“On our best day we’re 20 years away,” Mey­er­riecks said of true quantum com­put­ing (defined roughly as com­put­ing that every­one in com­put­ing sci­ence can agree is ac­tu­ally quantum in nature, achiev­ing en­tan­gle­ment.) “When it hap­pens, we have a huge chal­lenge. We are mak­ing sig­ni­fic­ant in­vest­ments and pay­ing a lot of at­ten­tion,”

Steve Chan, the dir­ect­or of the Net­work Sci­ence Re­search Cen­ter at IBM who joined Mey­er­riecks on stage in As­pen, said that the search for the quantum Holy Grail was not only con­fused but largely un­ne­ces­sary. Quantum is gen­er­ally re­ferred to as com­pu­ta­tion that takes ad­vant­age of the unique be­ha­vi­ors of quantum bits, or qubits, to rep­res­ent in­form­a­tion in mul­tiple ways, as op­posed to ones and zer­os. “Nowadays,” he said “we can do cus­tom chip design so we can use bin­ary rules but three di­git rep­res­ent­a­tions that get ba­sic­ally the same value, with few­er di­gits, which saves com­pu­ta­tion­al cycles.”

Put Your Faith in Big Data

The threats and the op­por­tun­it­ies tech­no­lo­gic­al ac­cel­er­a­tion oc­cupy the same space.

When asked about the ma­jor in­vest­ment areas of the fu­ture, Lynn Dugle, a vice pres­id­ent at mil­it­ary con­tract­or Ray­theon en­thu­si­ast­ic­ally offered up big data and de­scribed the “op­por­tun­ity to know things, through cy­ber-ana­lyt­ics, through per­son­al ana­lyt­ics.” She cited a com­mon in­dustry fore­cast that more than 50 bil­lion ma­chine-to-ma­chine con­nec­ted devices will in­hab­it the globe by 2020 (ac­cord­ing to fig­ures from Cisco), versus ap­prox­im­ately 13 bil­lion today.

Call­ing Big Data a big op­por­tun­ity has be­come al­most “glib” ac­cord­ing to Mey­er­riecks. But it’s an area where the CIA is also fo­cus­ing its ma­jor in­vest­ments and build­ing the cap­ab­il­ity to do the sort of highly-tar­geted and in­di­vidu­al spe­cif­ic data col­lec­tion that would make today’s NSA activ­it­ies look pos­it­ively quant. It’s big data big data that “dwarfs today’s twit­ter feeds,” she said, and em­phas­ized that is was data spe­cif­ic to an in­di­vidu­al, not every­one, “that’s tar­geted col­lec­tion. Not ran­dom col­lec­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×