U.S. Rules for Composing No-Fly List Leaked to Media

July 24, 2014, 8:59 a.m.

In­tern­al U.S. gov­ern­ment stand­ards for de­term­in­ing wheth­er in­di­vidu­als should be ad­ded to a ter­ror­ism watch­list have been leaked to the me­dia.

The In­ter­cept, an in­vest­ig­at­ive news web­site, on Wed­nes­day pub­lished the gov­ern­ment’s “Watch­list­ing Guid­ance,” which was cur­rent as of March 2013, the New York Times re­por­ted. The In­ter­cept in­dic­ated that the in­tern­al rules were ob­tained by a source oth­er than former Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden, who is well known for his col­lab­or­a­tion with the web­site.

The watch­list rule book says that in­crim­in­at­ing ac­tions that would im­plic­ate an in­di­vidu­al in­clude trav­el­ing to a ter­ror­ist train­ing school or hav­ing mul­tiple con­tacts with known ter­ror­ists. Prac­tices pro­tec­ted un­der the First Amend­ment, such as re­li­gious be­liefs or com­mu­nic­a­tions that ma­lign U.S. policies, are not enough to war­rant place­ment on the no-fly list. However, the rules note that ac­tions that are pro­tec­ted un­der the First Amend­ment for U.S. cit­izens do not ap­ply to for­eign­ers in oth­er coun­tries. In­cite­ment or the en­cour­age­ment of ex­trem­ist strikes can be used to sug­gest someone for in­clu­sion on the watch­list.

In May, U.S. At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er ar­gued that the watch­list stand­ards should re­main con­fid­en­tial. “If the guid­ance were re­leased, it would provide a clear road map to un­der­mine the gov­ern­ment’s screen­ing ef­forts, a key coun­terter­ror­ism meas­ure, and thus its dis­clos­ure reas­on­ably could be ex­pec­ted to cause sig­ni­fic­ant harm to na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” Hold­er said in a court af­fi­davit.

The gov­ern­ment en­tity re­spons­ible for de­cid­ing who is placed on the ter­ror­ism watch­list is the Ter­ror­ism Screen­ing Cen­ter, a branch of the FBI. The bur­eau did not re­turn a re­quest for com­ment.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×