Lawmakers Attack Obama Administration’s Strategy in Iraq

Members of Congress doubt Iraqi government can root out terrorists.

National Journal
Stacy Kaper
July 24, 2014, 10:53 a.m.

In its second day of testi­mony on Cap­it­ol Hill, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion tried once again to prove it has a handle on the situ­ation in Ir­aq, where a ter­ror­ist up­ris­ing has gained key strong­holds and driv­en tens of thou­sands of refugees to flee across its crum­bling bor­ders.

 

At a heated hear­ing Thursday with of­fi­cials from the State and De­fense de­part­ments, Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee mem­bers took turns pok­ing holes in the U.S. strategy, ask­ing a lit­any of ques­tions about the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s as­sump­tions and plans for hand­ling the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia.

 

Com­mit­tee Chair­man Robert Men­en­dez ques­tioned why the ad­min­is­tra­tion has faith that Ir­aq will form an ef­fect­ive “func­tion­al fed­er­al­ist” state as the U.S. en­vi­sions, par­tic­u­larly if Prime Min­is­ter Nouri al-Ma­liki re­mains in power.

 

“Many say what is hap­pen­ing on the ground is ac­cel­er­at­ing to­wards a break­up of Ir­aq be­cause too many Ir­aqi com­munit­ies no longer trust the Ma­liki gov­ern­ment, and the ques­tion is wheth­er we can do any­thing to pre­vent it,” the New Jer­sey Demo­crat said.

 

Brett McGurk, the deputy as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for Ir­aq and Ir­an, who just re­turned from Ir­aq, ar­gued that there is an “emer­ging con­sensus” around this mod­el of de­cent­ral­iz­ing power but keep­ing the state to­geth­er, “in which you re­cog­nize a very sub­stan­tial de­vol­u­tion of au­thor­it­ies to prin­ciples of loc­al se­cur­ity con­trol.”

 

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials ar­gued Wed­nes­day that U.S. in­terests are best served if Ir­aq does not break up in­to smal­ler eth­nic fac­tions.

 

But Men­en­dez ques­tioned wheth­er such as­pir­a­tions are real­ist­ic giv­en the un­stable se­cur­ity and polit­ic­al situ­ation.

 

“Can you even get to a fed­er­al­ist mod­el the way things are evolving in Ir­aq?” he asked. “If it ends up be­ing the prime min­is­ter is Ma­liki, how do you think that you keep this na­tion to­geth­er?… Isn’t the likely out­come of that to be more pos­sible to see a di­vided Ir­aq?”

 

McGurk stuck to his guns that the U.S. is not get­ting in­volved in wheth­er Ma­liki should stay or go, but he ac­know­ledged his con­tin­ued lead­er­ship would present chal­lenges. “It re­mains to be seen wheth­er the ex­ist­ing prime min­is­ter could build such a con­sensus, but that re­mains very much a ques­tion,” he said.

 

State and De­fense of­fi­cials said they have had the Is­lam­ic State on their radar for years but only picked up on the threat that Mo­sul would be taken days be­fore it was stun­ningly seized without Ir­aqi Se­cur­ity Forces put­ting up a fight. Par­tic­u­larly in light of such a se­cur­ity col­lapse, De­fense of­fi­cials are re­view­ing as­sess­ments of Ir­aqi Se­cur­ity Forces and the situ­ation on the ground with plans to up­date Obama soon on his mil­it­ary op­tions.

 

But Men­en­dez ar­gued that the com­mit­tee would be re­luct­ant to ap­prove any fu­ture arms sales to Ir­aq un­less the as­sess­ments are shared with Con­gress and can demon­strate that the Ir­aqi Se­cur­ity Forces are com­pet­ent, after watch­ing U.S. weapons fall so eas­ily in­to the hands of ter­ror­ists.

 

“Un­less you are go­ing to give us a sense of where the se­cur­ity forces are at, mov­ing for­ward, this chair is not go­ing to be will­ing to ap­prove more arms sales so that they can be aban­doned to go to the hands of those that we are ser­i­ously con­cerned about in terms of our own na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” he said.

 

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials ar­gued they are try­ing to ad­dress IS­IS’s ad­vance­ment in Ir­aq as a re­gion­al con­flict that threatens the broad­er area and are so­li­cit­ing the as­sist­ance of al­lies in the re­gion.

 

But sev­er­al com­mit­tee mem­bers cri­ti­cized the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand­ling of the situ­ation, par­tic­u­larly the lack of more pro­act­ive ac­tion to ad­dress the civil war in neigh­bor­ing Syr­ia, which has be­come a train­ing camp for IS­IS sui­cide bombers and a safe haven for ter­ror­ists.

 

“People on this com­mit­tee have been say­ing for like a year and half that when the time was right””when we could have taken steps in Syr­ia that could have pre­ven­ted this””they wer­en’t taken,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee, the pan­el’s rank­ing mem­ber.

 

Cork­er ad­ded that he ques­tions wheth­er Obama’s in­terest in send­ing $500 mil­lion to sup­port Syr­i­an rebels now amounts to too little too late.

 

“I now have got­ten to the point where I ques­tion, I hate to say it, how ef­fect­ive that’s go­ing to be at this point,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
6 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
LATER TO THIS YEAR’S NADER
Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

Source:
HE’D SIPHON OFF DEM VOTES
RNC Chief Would Welcome Bloomberg
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“The lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic na­tion­al com­mit­tees on Wed­nes­day weighed in on the pro­spect of an in­de­pend­ent pres­id­en­tial run by” former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz sug­ges­ted that the former New York City may­or’s pri­or­it­ies are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Demo­crat­ic plat­form, while RNC lead­er Re­ince Priebus wel­comed the idea, say­ing Bloomberg would si­phon off votes from the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate.”

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
8 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.

Source:
×