Lawmakers Attack Obama Administration’s Strategy in Iraq

Members of Congress doubt Iraqi government can root out terrorists.

National Journal
Stacy Kaper
July 24, 2014, 10:53 a.m.

In its second day of testi­mony on Cap­it­ol Hill, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion tried once again to prove it has a handle on the situ­ation in Ir­aq, where a ter­ror­ist up­ris­ing has gained key strong­holds and driv­en tens of thou­sands of refugees to flee across its crum­bling bor­ders.

 

At a heated hear­ing Thursday with of­fi­cials from the State and De­fense de­part­ments, Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee mem­bers took turns pok­ing holes in the U.S. strategy, ask­ing a lit­any of ques­tions about the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s as­sump­tions and plans for hand­ling the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia.

 

Com­mit­tee Chair­man Robert Men­en­dez ques­tioned why the ad­min­is­tra­tion has faith that Ir­aq will form an ef­fect­ive “func­tion­al fed­er­al­ist” state as the U.S. en­vi­sions, par­tic­u­larly if Prime Min­is­ter Nouri al-Ma­liki re­mains in power.

 

“Many say what is hap­pen­ing on the ground is ac­cel­er­at­ing to­wards a break­up of Ir­aq be­cause too many Ir­aqi com­munit­ies no longer trust the Ma­liki gov­ern­ment, and the ques­tion is wheth­er we can do any­thing to pre­vent it,” the New Jer­sey Demo­crat said.

 

Brett McGurk, the deputy as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of State for Ir­aq and Ir­an, who just re­turned from Ir­aq, ar­gued that there is an “emer­ging con­sensus” around this mod­el of de­cent­ral­iz­ing power but keep­ing the state to­geth­er, “in which you re­cog­nize a very sub­stan­tial de­vol­u­tion of au­thor­it­ies to prin­ciples of loc­al se­cur­ity con­trol.”

 

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials ar­gued Wed­nes­day that U.S. in­terests are best served if Ir­aq does not break up in­to smal­ler eth­nic fac­tions.

 

But Men­en­dez ques­tioned wheth­er such as­pir­a­tions are real­ist­ic giv­en the un­stable se­cur­ity and polit­ic­al situ­ation.

 

“Can you even get to a fed­er­al­ist mod­el the way things are evolving in Ir­aq?” he asked. “If it ends up be­ing the prime min­is­ter is Ma­liki, how do you think that you keep this na­tion to­geth­er?… Isn’t the likely out­come of that to be more pos­sible to see a di­vided Ir­aq?”

 

McGurk stuck to his guns that the U.S. is not get­ting in­volved in wheth­er Ma­liki should stay or go, but he ac­know­ledged his con­tin­ued lead­er­ship would present chal­lenges. “It re­mains to be seen wheth­er the ex­ist­ing prime min­is­ter could build such a con­sensus, but that re­mains very much a ques­tion,” he said.

 

State and De­fense of­fi­cials said they have had the Is­lam­ic State on their radar for years but only picked up on the threat that Mo­sul would be taken days be­fore it was stun­ningly seized without Ir­aqi Se­cur­ity Forces put­ting up a fight. Par­tic­u­larly in light of such a se­cur­ity col­lapse, De­fense of­fi­cials are re­view­ing as­sess­ments of Ir­aqi Se­cur­ity Forces and the situ­ation on the ground with plans to up­date Obama soon on his mil­it­ary op­tions.

 

But Men­en­dez ar­gued that the com­mit­tee would be re­luct­ant to ap­prove any fu­ture arms sales to Ir­aq un­less the as­sess­ments are shared with Con­gress and can demon­strate that the Ir­aqi Se­cur­ity Forces are com­pet­ent, after watch­ing U.S. weapons fall so eas­ily in­to the hands of ter­ror­ists.

 

“Un­less you are go­ing to give us a sense of where the se­cur­ity forces are at, mov­ing for­ward, this chair is not go­ing to be will­ing to ap­prove more arms sales so that they can be aban­doned to go to the hands of those that we are ser­i­ously con­cerned about in terms of our own na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” he said.

 

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials ar­gued they are try­ing to ad­dress IS­IS’s ad­vance­ment in Ir­aq as a re­gion­al con­flict that threatens the broad­er area and are so­li­cit­ing the as­sist­ance of al­lies in the re­gion.

 

But sev­er­al com­mit­tee mem­bers cri­ti­cized the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand­ling of the situ­ation, par­tic­u­larly the lack of more pro­act­ive ac­tion to ad­dress the civil war in neigh­bor­ing Syr­ia, which has be­come a train­ing camp for IS­IS sui­cide bombers and a safe haven for ter­ror­ists.

 

“People on this com­mit­tee have been say­ing for like a year and half that when the time was right””when we could have taken steps in Syr­ia that could have pre­ven­ted this””they wer­en’t taken,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee, the pan­el’s rank­ing mem­ber.

 

Cork­er ad­ded that he ques­tions wheth­er Obama’s in­terest in send­ing $500 mil­lion to sup­port Syr­i­an rebels now amounts to too little too late.

 

“I now have got­ten to the point where I ques­tion, I hate to say it, how ef­fect­ive that’s go­ing to be at this point,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×