U.S. Worried Al-Qaida Has Bomb that Can Fool Airport Security

July 3, 2014, 7:44 a.m.

U.S. of­fi­cials are wor­ried that al-Qaida has de­veloped a new kind of bomb that can go un­detec­ted by air­port se­cur­ity, the Los Angeles Times re­ports.

In­tel­li­gence agen­cies re­cently found out that al-Qaida’s Ye­meni af­fil­i­ate, al-Qaida in the Ar­a­bi­an Pen­in­sula, has de­veloped a meth­od for smug­gling ex­plos­ives through air­port met­al de­tect­ors, body scan­ners and phys­ic­al pat-downs, two an­onym­ous U.S. coun­terter­ror­ism of­fi­cials told the news­pa­per in a Wed­nes­day art­icle.

The con­cern has promp­ted Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment head Jeh John­son to or­der the im­ple­ment­a­tion of “en­hanced se­cur­ity meas­ures” in the days ahead for U.S.-bound flights de­part­ing from Europe and the Middle East.

Of­fi­cials are re­portedly wor­ried that al-Qaida might re­cruit West­ern­ers that have been rad­ic­al­ized from their ex­per­i­ence fight­ing in the Syr­i­an civil war to smuggle the new type of bomb aboard a U.S.-bound pas­sen­ger flight. U.S. agen­cies do not have in­form­a­tion about any defin­it­ive plan to at­tack an air­liner.

The tightened se­cur­ity will go in­to ef­fect at 15 for­eign air­ports, uniden­ti­fied of­fi­cials told the New York Times. Home­land Se­cur­ity has shared some in­tel­li­gence and de­tails about the new se­cur­ity pro­to­cols with part­ner gov­ern­ments and air­line com­pan­ies.

Al-Qaida in the Ar­a­bi­an Pen­in­sula is un­der­stood to be more fo­cused than any oth­er for­eign ter­ror­ist group on car­ry­ing out dir­ect at­tacks on the U.S. home­land. The ji­hadist group thrice be­fore has at­temp­ted un­suc­cess­fully to bomb cargo and pas­sen­ger planes fly­ing to the United States. The or­gan­iz­a­tion’s head ex­plos­ives ex­pert, Ibrahim Has­san al-Asiri, is still at large and has in­struc­ted a num­ber of fol­low­ers in the art of bomb mak­ing, of­fi­cials said.

Some ana­lysts be­lieve that al-Qaida has a new in­cent­ive to carry out a high-pro­file at­tack on the United States or Europe in or­der to burn­ish its ji­hadist repu­ta­tion, fol­low­ing the re­cent suc­cesses of its ex­com­mu­nic­ated former fran­chise, the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia, in seiz­ing con­trol of broad swaths of land.

In the United King­dom, the Brit­ish De­part­ment for Trans­port on Wed­nes­day an­nounced it it would “step up some of our avi­ation se­cur­ity meas­ures” in re­sponse to in­tel­li­gence warn­ings from the United States, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×