The VA’s Secret Claims

Is the VA sweeping the vast majority of its claims under the rug while proclaiming progress?

National Journal
Jordain Carney
June 26, 2014, 4 p.m.

The long-stand­ing slog with­in the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment to cut down its moun­tain of dis­ab­il­ity claims has been well doc­u­mented.

Or has it?

The VA loves to talk about how it’s on track to reach its goal next year of com­plet­ing all dis­ab­il­ity com­pens­a­tion and pen­sion claims with­in 125 days — keep­ing them off the dreaded “back­logged” list. Fre­quently over­looked? The oth­er two-thirds of VA claims — or more than 1 mil­lion re­quests — aren’t sub­ject to the de­part­ment’s 125-days, 98-per­cent ac­cur­acy goal.

“The VA does a good job in con­vin­cing law­makers and the pub­lic and the me­dia that the only claims that every­body should be fo­cused on should be dis­ab­il­ity claims,” said Ger­ald Man­ar, na­tion­al vet­er­ans ser­vice deputy dir­ect­or at the Vet­er­ans of For­eign Wars and a former 30-year VA em­ploy­ee. “… It’s disin­genu­ous of VA lead­ers to claim that they’ve made pro­gress, but there’s still all this oth­er work out there.”

What are these oth­er claims clog­ging up the VA’s sys­tem?

They run the gamut from aim­ing to change the amount of dis­ab­il­ity pay a vet­er­an re­ceives to ap­peal­ing pre­vi­ous de­cisions by the de­part­ment. They also in­clude re­sponses to con­gres­sion­al in­quir­ies. So while the num­ber of pending VA dis­ab­il­ity claims has shrunk in re­cent years, the num­ber of over­all claims has mush­roomed to roughly 1.64 mil­lion. That’s com­pared with 941,666 in late 2009.

Here is a break­down of the main claims the VA is wrest­ling with un­der the radar.

Award Ad­just­ments For those of you who don’t spend your free time dig­ging around the VA’s web­site or aren’t flu­ent in VA-speak, an award ad­just­ment is, well, ex­actly what it sounds like. Vet­er­ans or their fam­ily mem­bers can try to change the amount awar­ded to them or their fam­ily mem­bers for a vari­ety of reas­ons. The VA can also re­quest a change.

For ex­ample, a vet­er­an could want to re­in­state a child’s de­pend­ent status, so the child can re­ceive pay­ments from the VA. Or the de­part­ment could try to de­crease pen­sion pay for vet­er­ans whose in­come ex­ceeds a cer­tain threshold.

The VA needs to tackle 471,418 of these award ad­just­ments, which are di­vided between com­pens­a­tion and pen­sion pay­ments. And al­though these out­stand­ing claims aren’t in­cluded in the VA’s drive to cut the back­log, nearly 70 per­cent of them have been pending for 125 days or more.

Ap­peals These make up the second largest group of the VA’s oth­er claims. There are 279,055 pending ap­peals, which is more than the VA’s in­fam­ous num­ber of back­logged dis­ab­il­ity claims. Vet­er­ans’ ad­voc­ates are split on what is be­hind a re­cent in­crease in ap­peals. Some be­lieve that in the race to clear the claims that are of­fi­cially “back­logged,” more vet­er­ans are forced to ap­peal VA de­cisions that were rushed or in­ac­cur­ate. Oth­ers say that as the num­ber of claims that are pro­cessed in­creases, it makes sense to see a cor­rel­at­ing in­crease in ap­peals.

Either way, the ap­peals pro­cess can leave a vet­er­an in claims limbo for an ad­di­tion­al two and a half years.

The Oth­ers Think of it as the kit­chen draw­er where you stick the odds and ends — ran­dom takeout menus, those hol­i­day cook­ie cut­ters that you nev­er used, a broken can open­er you should prob­ably just throw away. Ex­cept when it comes to these oth­er claims, the VA has a lot of them — 327,602 to be ex­act, a ma­jor­ity of which are tied to com­pens­a­tion.

These claims can in­clude Free­dom of In­form­a­tion Act re­quests, cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ments, and even cor­res­pond­ence with law­makers. They also in­clude in­tern­al qual­ity re­views — an in-house at­tempt to catch ser­i­ous mis­takes.

A minor­ity of these claims — slightly more than 30,000 — are tied to pen­sions, which fol­lows a lar­ger trend in which pen­sion claims make up a re­l­at­ively small amount of the VA’s total claims work­load.

And while ac­know­ledging that the VA has made pro­gress on its dis­ab­il­ity com­pens­a­tion and pen­sion claims, Man­ar said, “The prob­lem is that they’ve done it to the ex­clu­sion of much of the rest of the work­load, and, as a con­sequence, there are even more glar­ing prob­lems.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×