Obama on Iraq: We Will Be Prepared to Take Targeted Military Action

“American forces will not be returning to combat in Iraq,” Obama said, “but we will help Iraqis as they take the fight to terrorists who threaten the Iraqi people.”

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during an East Room event at the White House June 9, 2014 in Washington, DC. President Obama signed a presidential memorandum on 'reducing the burden of student loan debt.'
National Journal
Kaveh Waddell Brian Resnick
June 19, 2014, 9:41 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced Thursday af­ter­noon that the U.S. will be step­ping up its in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing and mil­it­ary sup­port to help the Ir­aqis, but will not em­ploy com­bat forces out­right to deal with the crisis in the coun­try.

However, he said the U.S. “will be pre­pared to take tar­geted and pre­cise mil­it­ary ac­tion if and when we de­term­ine that the situ­ation on the ground re­quires it.”

In the last few weeks, a Sunni mil­it­ant group known as the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia has taken a num­ber of ma­jor cit­ies in the north­ern and west­ern re­gions of Ir­aq. The group’s mil­it­ary cam­paign has car­ried IS­IS fight­ers with­in strik­ing dis­tance of the Ir­aqi cap­it­al of Bagh­dad, and re­cent gains in north­w­est Ir­aq have brought the group closer to its goal of es­tab­lish­ing con­trol over a con­tigu­ous area span­ning the Ir­aqi-Syr­i­an bor­der.

“Amer­ic­an forces will not be re­turn­ing to com­bat in Ir­aq,” Obama said, “but we will help Ir­aqis as they take the fight to ter­ror­ists who threaten the Ir­aqi people, the re­gion, and Amer­ic­an in­terests as well.”

Pres­id­ent Obama met with con­gres­sion­al lead­ers Wed­nes­day to dis­cuss op­tions for Amer­ic­an as­sist­ance in Ir­aq. In the meet­ing, the pres­id­ent prom­ised to keep Con­gress in­formed as the situ­ation evolves. In a state­ment after the meet­ing, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id said the pres­id­ent “is not cur­rently con­sid­er­ing ac­tions that would re­quire con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al but was very clear that he would con­sult with Con­gress if that changed.”

The pres­id­ent framed Amer­ic­an ac­tion in Ir­aq in terms of na­tion­al se­cur­ity rather than in terms of hu­man­it­ari­an con­cern. “It is in our na­tion­al se­cur­ity in­terests not to see an all-out civil war in­side of Ir­aq,” Obama said. “Not just for hu­man­it­ari­an reas­ons but be­cause that ul­ti­mately can be destabil­iz­ing throughout the re­gion.” The spread of this con­flict would pose a threat to re­gion­al al­lies, the pres­id­ent said, and to the glob­al en­ergy mar­ket.

Ir­aq’s em­battled prime min­is­ter, Nuri al-Ma­liki, may be on his last legs. With Amer­ic­an sup­port, Ir­aqi can­did­ates, Sunni and Shiite both, are man­euv­er­ing to re­place the Shiite prime min­is­ter, whose sec­tari­an policies have been blamed for the cur­rent chaos in the coun­try.

“It’s not the place for the United States to choose Ir­aq’s lead­ers,” Obama said Thursday. “It is clear, though, that only lead­ers that can gov­ern with an in­clus­ive agenda are go­ing to be able to truly bring the Ir­aqi people to­geth­er and help them through this crisis.” This echoes Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry’s po­s­i­tion that any U.S. in­ter­ven­tion would be fo­cused on the wel­fare of the Ir­aqi state, not on prop­ping up the cur­rent prime min­is­ter.

On Wed­nes­day, Ir­a­ni­an Pres­id­ent Has­san Rouh­ani an­nounced that Ir­an “will not hes­it­ate” to in­volve it­self in Ir­aq in or­der to pro­tect sites holy to Shiite Muslims. Ir­an is a ma­jor back­er of Ma­liki’s gov­ern­ment in Ir­aq.

Obama warned that Ir­a­ni­an in­volve­ment could be harm­ful if it took on a sec­tari­an tint. “If Ir­an is com­ing in solely as an armed force on be­half of the [Shiites],” Obama said, “then that prob­ably wor­sens the situ­ation and the pro­spect for gov­ern­ment form­a­tion that would ac­tu­ally be con­struct­ive over the long term.”

The U.S. and Ir­an have dis­cussed the pos­sib­il­ity of co­oper­at­ing in Ir­aq to drive back IS­IS forces, but the two are less likely to share in­terests if the U.S. turns away from sup­port­ing Ma­liki. Con­gres­sion­al lead­ers have spoken out against co­oper­at­ing with Ir­an: House Speak­er John Boehner and House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi both warned against any col­lab­or­a­tion.

But for Obama, co­oper­at­ing with Ir­an de­pends on the de­cisions of its lead­er­ship. “Just as Ir­aq’s lead­ers have to make de­cisions, I think Ir­an has heard from us,” Obama said.

This story is break­ing and may be up­dated.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×