An Air Force general defended plans to replace the long-range U.S. bomber fleet, amid questions on the project’s necessity, the Washington Times reports.
“We need to actually have an unemotional debate about what’s going on and how we need to modernize, and how we need to protect America from its only existential threat,” Maj. Gen. Garrett Harencak said in comments reported on Wednesday. Harencak, the Air Force assistant chief of staff for strategic deterrence and nuclear integration, spoke weeks after a Congressional Research Service report referenced a number of U.S. lawmakers who see the nation’s aging bombers as “increasingly irrelevant.”
“Bombers are as needed today as they ever were,” according to Harencak, who argued for developing a new line of long-range strike bombers to replace the country’s current strategic aircraft. The country’s nuclear-capable bomber fleet now includes the 24-year-old B-2 bomber and the 50-year-old B-52.
“We’re told the United States Air Force will keep the B-52 flying till 2040,” he said. “[Are you] willing to send your grandchildren into combat in 80-year-old airplanes and send them then to the depths of the sea in 55-year-old hulls?”
The new aircraft would offer “persistent, long-range strike capabilities that provide practical alternatives for global security, regional stability in all phases of combat operations,” Harencak said.
The officer’s comments suggest the Air Force is pushing to prevent any new postponement of the new bombers, according to the Times. The service hopes to deploy 100 of the systems by the middle of the next decade.
Meanwhile, the service said it plans to develop components for the next-generation aircraft using graphene, a very thin form of carbon. Air Force Global Strike Command recently finalized plans to partner with Louisiana Tech University for the initiative, according to a Wednesday press release.
What We're Following See More »
Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”
"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.
"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."
"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.