Japan may ratify a treaty forcing atomic-facility operators to assume full liability for any accidents at the sites, Bloomberg reports.
The country’s foreign ministry on Friday said that joining the pact — called the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage — would embolden knowledgeable U.S. firms to support decontamination and dismantlement efforts at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Four of the atomic facility’s six reactors suffered meltdowns after the site sustained substantial damage in a 2011 tsunami.
Japanese lawmakers would consider a ratification bill for the treaty in 2014, the foreign ministry said. It provided no further details on the legislation’s anticipated timing.
U.S. Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman on Thursday said Japan’s ratification of the agreement would “give confidence to U.S. companies” by shielding them from potential legal action, the Japan Times reported.
“If there is confusion about liability, they’re just not about to take a business risk of getting into new markets,” according to the U.S. official.
Antinuclear advocates, though, contend that the treaty contains inappropriate protection for nuclear-facility builders, as well as other problems, according to Bloomberg. Opponents noted that Japan’s government began covering Fukushima recovery expenses, which now stand at roughly $108 billion, after the costs forced the plant’s private operator close to bankruptcy.
“Capping the amount of liability that either the nuclear operator or the state would be responsible for fundamentally limits the amount that victims can be compensated for,” according to Kendra Ulrich, an activist with Greenpeace International in Amsterdam.
The pact has yet to enter into force among its signatories, and only four nations have joined the treaty to date: the United States, Argentina, Morocco and Romania.
Japan’s entry would render the agreement legally binding by bringing the collective nuclear-power capacity of its members to 400 gigawatts.
- 1 The Net Has Never Been ‘Neutral’
- 2 Congress Says NIH Should Have Spent Money on Ebola Instead of Puppet Shows and Rabbit Massages
- 3 Obama’s ‘Privacy Bill of Rights’ Gets Bashed from All Sides
- 4 Army Lt. Gen. Sean MacFarland to Lead U.S. Fight Against ISIS
- 5 The Forgotten, Radical Martin Luther King Jr.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.