The U.S. House on Thursday approved a bill that seeks to keep the Obama administration from implementing a strategic arms control treaty with Russia.
In a vote of 233-191, Congress’ lower chamber approved an amendment to its annual defense-authorization legislation that would provisionally block the Pentagon from using any fiscal 2015 funds to implement the New START accord. Expenditures would be prohibited until Moscow is deemed in compliance with several other arms control agreements, is “no longer illegally occupying” the Crimean Peninsula, and ceases destabilizing activities in other parts of Ukraine.
The House went on to approve the Fiscal 2015 National Defense Authorization Act by a 325-98 vote. The White House earlier this week threatened to veto the bill over a number of its nuclear nonproliferation, missile defense and other military measures. The Senate is currently drafting its own version of the policy-setting legislation.
The New START pact entered into force in February 2011, after the Obama administration lobbied fiercely for its passage in the Senate. The treaty is considered one of President Obama’s key foreign policy accomplishments. It requires the United States and Russia by 2018 to cap their respective fielded long-range nuclear arsenals at 1,550 warheads. The pact also requires each side to limit to 800 its deployed and nondeployed strategic delivery platforms, including bomber aircraft and ground- and submarine-based ballistic missiles.
The amendment on New START implementation was introduced by Representative Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), who sits on the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee.
“I am pleased that the House adopted my resolution by an overwhelming, bipartisan majority,” Lamborn said in an emailed statement to Global Security Newswire. “I don’t think the United States should be spending money to disarm ourselves — to dramatically cut our strategic nuclear deterrent — if the other party to the treaty requiring these cuts is verifiably dishonest.”
The Obama administration is on record as being concerned that Russia may not be in compliance with the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which outlaws either side from testing or deploying any cruise or ballistic missile with ranges between 300 and 3,400 miles. The focus of the concerns reportedly is the test-launching in recent years of different missiles to ranges forbidden by the accord.
“The Russian Federation is clearly not trustworthy,” Lamborn said. “Their actions in Ukraine and violation of agreements such as the INF treaty and [Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty] should be cause for great concern.” The latter arms control treaty is a multinational pact that restricts deployments of heavy conventional weaponry on the continent; Russia withdrew from the accord in 2007.
The House also approved an amendment — sponsored by Representative Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) — that would boost fiscal 2015 funding by $99 million for the purchase of Standard Missile 3 Block 1B interceptors.
“My amendment would restore nine of the vital SM3-1B interceptors this administration would have otherwise cut from our defense budget,” said Franks, who co-chairs the Congressional Missile Defense Caucus, in a statement to GSN.
The Raytheon Co.-produced Block 1B missile is designed to destroy short- and medium-range ballistic missiles. The weapon is slated for deployment on four U.S. Aegis-equipped warships homeported in Spain and at an as-yet unfinished installation in Romania, as part of the Obama administration’s plan for supporting NATO missile defense.
The measure offsets the hike in spending by making a $75.3 million cut to the budget of a cross-service reconnaissance aircraft and a $23.7 million cut to an effort to implement benefit-reform proposals in the Defense Health Program.
“The rogue missile threat to the United States and our allies is inarguably and relentlessly expanding,” Franks said. “The best way to negate these threats is a credible, comprehensive missile defense system.”
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."