Congressional Panel Blocks Industry Role in Plutonium-Disposal Decision

None

Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.) speaks during a Washington news conference in 2011. Garamendi tried to add provisions to a defense bill this week that would require the Energy Department to involve industry in deciding how to dispose of excess plutonium.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
May 21, 2014, 10:43 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an-led House Rules Com­mit­tee has blocked an ef­fort by some House Demo­crats to have the En­ergy De­part­ment in­volve the private sec­tor in its de­cision on how to dis­pose bomb-grade plutoni­um leftover from the Cold War.

The En­ergy De­part­ment re­cently de­cided to put con­struc­tion of a con­tro­ver­sial fa­cil­ity that would con­vert the plutoni­um in­to nuc­le­ar fuel on hold while it con­siders wheth­er to pur­sue oth­er — pos­sibly cheap­er — ways of dis­pos­ing the ma­ter­i­al.

The de­part­ment earli­er this month re­leased a pre­lim­in­ary study of op­tions, and told law­makers it would take an ad­di­tion­al 18 months to make a de­cision.

The United States is re­quired to dis­pose of the ex­cess plutoni­um as part of an agree­ment with Rus­sia, but law­makers have raised con­cerns about the cost of us­ing the fuel-con­ver­sion plan to do so. Mean­while, act­iv­ists have raised con­cerns the strategy could ac­tu­ally in­crease pro­lif­er­a­tion risks.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive John Gara­mendi (D-Cal­if.), with sup­port from sev­en oth­er House Demo­crats, offered the meas­ure as an amend­ment to the fisc­al 2015 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill. It would have re­quired the de­part­ment to so­li­cit pro­pos­als from con­tract­ors on how they might dis­pose of the plutoni­um, should the gov­ern­ment de­cide to scrap the mixed-ox­ide fuel-con­ver­sion plan.

Speak­ing to Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire on Tues­day, Gara­mendi said the goal of the amend­ment was to ac­cel­er­ate the de­part­ment’s de­cision-mak­ing pro­cess. The meas­ure also was “to in­volve those com­pan­ies and en­tit­ies that ac­tu­ally know how to do this stuff and have done and could do it,” he said.

“It’s one thing to have the [de­part­ment’s semi­autonom­ous Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion] spend a lot of time try­ing to sort out what they want to do, and they don’t have a good track re­cord,” Gara­mendi said. “But there are com­pan­ies and en­tit­ies that could do this, and I want them to make a form­al present­a­tion on how they would do it and what it would cost.”

Among the ques­tions Gara­mendi would want con­tract­ors to an­swer is wheth­er they would use the par­tially built MOX fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina to dis­pose of the plutoni­um in an­oth­er way, “and if not, where would you do it and how would you do it and so forth. Oth­er­wise, the NNSA is go­ing to spend 18 months ba­sic­ally go­ing around in circles, and at the end of the time they will be no fur­ther ahead than they are now.”

Gara­mendi said he thought a de­cision could be made “much faster” than in the 18 months the de­part­ment pre­dicted. He said he ex­pec­ted the de­part­ment could give con­tract­ors 60 days to sub­mit ini­tial pro­pos­als, fol­lowed by an ad­di­tion­al six months to ob­tained more de­tailed plans from those it deems qual­i­fied.

Oth­er law­makers also are look­ing to ac­cel­er­ate vari­ous as­pects of the de­part­ment’s re­view of the plutoni­um-dis­pos­i­tion pro­ject. Say­ing they doubted En­ergy’s es­tim­ates for how much it would cost to carry on with the MOX op­tion, Sen­ate ap­pro­pri­at­ors earli­er this month asked de­part­ment of­fi­cials to “re-look at the MOX num­bers [and sug­gest] po­ten­tial changes that can be made to “¦ keep the price down.”

At press time, it was un­clear wheth­er En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cials had com­plied with that re­quest.

A spokes­man for Sen­at­or Di­anne Fein­stein (D-Cal­if.), who chairs the Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations En­ergy and Wa­ter De­vel­op­ment Sub­com­mit­tee, did not re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment. An En­ergy De­part­ment spokes­wo­man also could not be reached by press time.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, mean­while, is ob­ject­ing to lan­guage already in the House de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill that would re­quire the de­part­ment to con­tin­ue con­struc­tion on the MOX fa­cil­ity, ac­cord­ing to a state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy the White House is­sued this week.

“The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plan to move the fa­cil­ity in­to cold standby in [fisc­al 2015] while it con­tin­ues to ex­plore more cost-ef­fect­ive al­tern­at­ives will save tax­pay­ers bil­lions of dol­lars, while still main­tain­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment’s com­mit­ment to dis­pos­ing of un­needed plutoni­um,” the state­ment said.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
21 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×