Congressional Panel Blocks Industry Role in Plutonium-Disposal Decision

Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.) speaks during a Washington news conference in 2011. Garamendi tried to add provisions to a defense bill this week that would require the Energy Department to involve industry in deciding how to dispose of excess plutonium.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
May 21, 2014, 10:43 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an-led House Rules Com­mit­tee has blocked an ef­fort by some House Demo­crats to have the En­ergy De­part­ment in­volve the private sec­tor in its de­cision on how to dis­pose bomb-grade plutoni­um leftover from the Cold War.

The En­ergy De­part­ment re­cently de­cided to put con­struc­tion of a con­tro­ver­sial fa­cil­ity that would con­vert the plutoni­um in­to nuc­le­ar fuel on hold while it con­siders wheth­er to pur­sue oth­er — pos­sibly cheap­er — ways of dis­pos­ing the ma­ter­i­al.

The de­part­ment earli­er this month re­leased a pre­lim­in­ary study of op­tions, and told law­makers it would take an ad­di­tion­al 18 months to make a de­cision.

The United States is re­quired to dis­pose of the ex­cess plutoni­um as part of an agree­ment with Rus­sia, but law­makers have raised con­cerns about the cost of us­ing the fuel-con­ver­sion plan to do so. Mean­while, act­iv­ists have raised con­cerns the strategy could ac­tu­ally in­crease pro­lif­er­a­tion risks.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive John Gara­mendi (D-Cal­if.), with sup­port from sev­en oth­er House Demo­crats, offered the meas­ure as an amend­ment to the fisc­al 2015 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill. It would have re­quired the de­part­ment to so­li­cit pro­pos­als from con­tract­ors on how they might dis­pose of the plutoni­um, should the gov­ern­ment de­cide to scrap the mixed-ox­ide fuel-con­ver­sion plan.

Speak­ing to Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire on Tues­day, Gara­mendi said the goal of the amend­ment was to ac­cel­er­ate the de­part­ment’s de­cision-mak­ing pro­cess. The meas­ure also was “to in­volve those com­pan­ies and en­tit­ies that ac­tu­ally know how to do this stuff and have done and could do it,” he said.

“It’s one thing to have the [de­part­ment’s semi­autonom­ous Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion] spend a lot of time try­ing to sort out what they want to do, and they don’t have a good track re­cord,” Gara­mendi said. “But there are com­pan­ies and en­tit­ies that could do this, and I want them to make a form­al present­a­tion on how they would do it and what it would cost.”

Among the ques­tions Gara­mendi would want con­tract­ors to an­swer is wheth­er they would use the par­tially built MOX fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina to dis­pose of the plutoni­um in an­oth­er way, “and if not, where would you do it and how would you do it and so forth. Oth­er­wise, the NNSA is go­ing to spend 18 months ba­sic­ally go­ing around in circles, and at the end of the time they will be no fur­ther ahead than they are now.”

Gara­mendi said he thought a de­cision could be made “much faster” than in the 18 months the de­part­ment pre­dicted. He said he ex­pec­ted the de­part­ment could give con­tract­ors 60 days to sub­mit ini­tial pro­pos­als, fol­lowed by an ad­di­tion­al six months to ob­tained more de­tailed plans from those it deems qual­i­fied.

Oth­er law­makers also are look­ing to ac­cel­er­ate vari­ous as­pects of the de­part­ment’s re­view of the plutoni­um-dis­pos­i­tion pro­ject. Say­ing they doubted En­ergy’s es­tim­ates for how much it would cost to carry on with the MOX op­tion, Sen­ate ap­pro­pri­at­ors earli­er this month asked de­part­ment of­fi­cials to “re-look at the MOX num­bers [and sug­gest] po­ten­tial changes that can be made to “¦ keep the price down.”

At press time, it was un­clear wheth­er En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cials had com­plied with that re­quest.

A spokes­man for Sen­at­or Di­anne Fein­stein (D-Cal­if.), who chairs the Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations En­ergy and Wa­ter De­vel­op­ment Sub­com­mit­tee, did not re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment. An En­ergy De­part­ment spokes­wo­man also could not be reached by press time.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, mean­while, is ob­ject­ing to lan­guage already in the House de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill that would re­quire the de­part­ment to con­tin­ue con­struc­tion on the MOX fa­cil­ity, ac­cord­ing to a state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy the White House is­sued this week.

“The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plan to move the fa­cil­ity in­to cold standby in [fisc­al 2015] while it con­tin­ues to ex­plore more cost-ef­fect­ive al­tern­at­ives will save tax­pay­ers bil­lions of dol­lars, while still main­tain­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment’s com­mit­ment to dis­pos­ing of un­needed plutoni­um,” the state­ment said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×