In Pakistan, Drones Have Made Their Way Into Love Poems

“I am looking for you like a drone, my love. You have become Osama, no one knows your whereabouts.”

Pakistani victims of a US drone attack Naima (L) and Saima (R) rest on a bed after they arrived with their brothers and sisters from the North Waziristan area of Ghundai Village for treatment in Peshawar on November 3, 2012, after US missile hit near their house on October 24. A US drone fired two missiles at a suspected militant compound in northwest Pakistan, killing three people, security officials said.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
May 12, 2014, 3:35 p.m.

IS­LAMABAD — In Pakistan’s north­w­est tri­bal re­gion, where drones hum over­head and mil­it­ants hide, this is ro­mantic: “I am look­ing for you like a drone, my love,” a verse of a loc­al folk poem says. “You have be­come Osama, no one knows your where­abouts.”

When Amer­ic­ans talk about drones, they en­vi­sion ter­ror­ist tar­gets in faraway lands. When Wash­ing­ton pun­dits talk about drones, they ques­tion wheth­er push-but­ton com­bat im­pedes in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing or if ci­vil­ians are ac­ci­dent­al cas­u­al­ties.

But for those who live in the areas bom­barded by armed drones, shad­owy U.S. war­fare has in­fec­ted cul­ture. Drones, re­por­ted to have killed at least 2,500 people in Pakistan alone, are fea­tured in the mu­sic and po­etry cre­ated there.

An Is­lamabad-based re­search group tracked the im­pact of the war on ter­ror­ism on Pashto lit­er­at­ure and art in the Fed­er­ally Ad­min­istered Tri­bal Areas, speak­ing with artists, po­ets, and lit­er­ary fig­ures to il­lus­trate the cul­tur­al trans­form­a­tion since the Sept. 11, 2001, at­tacks.

“As a war was ini­ti­ated on the soil of Pash­tuns al­most im­me­di­ately … the blood­shed, bomb blasts, drone at­tacks, and aer­i­al fir­ing com­pelled writers to for­get ever­green top­ics of love, ro­mance, and nature,” said the FATA Re­search Cen­ter’s March re­port. “The vi­ol­ent cir­cum­stances that rose from the ashes of 9/11 com­pelled Pashto liter­ati to write about broken fam­il­ies, severed limbs “¦ rather than silky curls and rosy cheeks of their be­loveds.”

Those tra­di­tion­al, flowery im­ages are some­times com­bined with the war ma­chines in art. A pop­u­lar Pashto sing­er, Sit­ara Younis sings: “The touch of my lips sweeten words. In­tox­ic­at­ing as wine are my looks. My gaze is as fatal as a drone at­tack.”

Younis’s pop­u­lar songs play on the ra­dio and at wed­dings. Her oth­er hit has an even dark­er theme: “Don’t chase me, I’m a trick,” she sings, warn­ing a man to keep his dis­tance. “I’m a sui­cide bomb.”

The vi­ol­ence in art re­flects how dra­mat­ic­ally life has changed in the tri­bal areas over the last dec­ade. Av­er­age Pash­tuns, the re­port found, now un­der­stand the mean­ing of Eng­lish words such as “drone,” “ter­ror­ist,” and “sui­cide blast.” Chil­dren ref­er­ence the Taliban and the Army in games. Many fam­il­ies were too afraid to in­vite guests to their homes after the drone cam­paign began for fear they could not pro­tect them, says Ir­fan Ud­din, a FATA Cen­ter re­search­er.

Some artists refer spe­cific­ally to the Taliban as in­ten­ded tar­gets of the U.S. strikes. “Your eyes are no less than a drone,” one poem reads. “They turned me in­to ashes, as I was fa­cing them like a mem­ber of the Taliban.”

When Ud­din lived in Mir­an­shah to con­duct re­search, he saw how drones could in­spire the acute fear that formed the basis for the art and po­etry to fol­low. He was sit­ting in a court­yard one day when a friend calmly said, “The drone is com­ing.”

“I did feel it com­ing, but I nev­er saw it,” Ud­din said. “I got up, and star­ted run­ning to the house. It was the most aw­ful mo­ment in my life.”

A Pashto sing­er, Nazia Iqbal, high­lights those feel­ings of help­less­ness in her poems: “My love, you are far away from me, and these drones will tar­get you. I am help­less and can’t stop them, and my tears are drop­ping from my eyes as if wa­ter is drop­ping from a spring.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×