Gottemoeller Warns Against Stopping Nuclear Security Work in Russia

U.S. Undersecretary of State Rose Gottemoeller speaks in Moscow in 2012. Gottemoeller is warning against stopping U.S. nuclear security work in Russia amid the crisis in Ukraine.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
May 12, 2014, 9:42 a.m.

The State De­part­ment’s top arms con­trol of­fi­cial is stress­ing that it is in the best in­terests of the United States to con­tin­ue do­ing nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity work in Rus­sia — even as the Ukraine crisis rages.

The Re­pub­lic­an-led House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee last week ap­proved le­gis­lat­ive lan­guage that would pre­vent the U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment from us­ing fisc­al 2015 funds “for any con­tract, co­oper­a­tion, or trans­fer of tech­no­logy” between the United States and Rus­sia un­til the crisis has been re­solved. The pan­el in­cluded the lan­guage in its ver­sion of the an­nu­al de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill, which it passed last week.

Un­der­sec­ret­ary of State Rose Got­te­moeller sug­ges­ted on Fri­day that such a pro­hib­i­tion would be tan­tamount to shoot­ing “ourselves in the foot,” however. “At the heart of our ra­tionale for con­tinu­ing this work” is that it is “mani­festly in the na­tion­al in­terest of the United States to con­tin­ue “¦ min­im­iz­ing the danger that fis­sile ma­ter­i­als [could] fall in­to the hands of ter­ror­ists.”

Fis­sile ma­ter­i­als are those that could be used to make an atom­ic bomb. Ukrain­i­an au­thor­it­ies just last week an­nounced the seizure of ra­dio­act­ive ma­ter­i­al they feared could have been used to make a ra­di­olo­gic­al weapon.

“We ac­know­ledge and are gravely con­cerned with the crisis in Ukraine — there’s no ques­tion about it,” Got­te­moeller said in re­sponse to a ques­tion from Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire. “But we shouldn’t shoot ourselves in the foot in terms of stop­ping or halt­ing im­port­ant na­tion­al se­cur­ity work that pre­vents nuc­le­ar bombs from get­ting in the hands of ter­ror­ists be­cause we have oth­er grave con­cerns.

“I’m mix­ing meta­phors here, but we can walk and chew gum at the same time,” Got­te­moeller ad­ded. “We must con­tin­ue to ad­dress our core na­tion­al se­cur­ity con­cerns while we ad­dress out grave con­cerns about this crisis in Ukraine.”

Ac­cord­ing to Got­te­moeller, cer­tain nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion activ­it­ies have been “fenced off in this cur­rent crisis.”

Among them is im­ple­ment­a­tion of the New START arms re­duc­tion treaty with Rus­sia, which she said “is go­ing for­ward in a very prac­tic­al way without dif­fi­culties.”

Also in­cluded is the En­ergy De­part­ment col­lab­or­a­tion with Ros­atom, the Rus­si­an atom­ic en­ergy agency, which she said had so far been re­spons­ible for the re­mov­al of 3,000 kilo­grams of highly en­riched urani­um and plutoni­um from third-party coun­tries. The col­lab­or­a­tion also in­volves up­grad­ing the phys­ic­al se­cur­ity of build­ings in Rus­sia where sens­it­ive nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al is stored, DOE of­fi­cials have said pre­vi­ously.

Al­though lan­guage in the House bill sug­ges­ted this work had already been stopped and should re­main so un­til the res­ol­u­tion of the situ­ation in Ukraine, Got­te­moeller said it was her un­der­stand­ing it had been un­af­fected by the crisis. A spokes­man for the En­ergy De­part­ment’s Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion made a sim­il­ar state­ment to GSN earli­er last week.

Speak­ing at a De­fense Writers Group break­fast, Got­te­moeller ad­dressed oth­er ques­tions per­tain­ing to nuc­le­ar weapons and the Ukraine crisis, in­clud­ing wheth­er the former So­viet state should not have passed its atom­ic ar­sen­al back to Rus­sia as part of the so-called Bud­apest Memor­andum after the end of the Cold War.

Re­fer­ring to the agree­ment, un­der which Rus­sia was to re­spect the sov­er­eignty of Ukraine, Got­te­moeller told re­port­ers that “the doc­u­ment is not at fault.” The crisis is the fault of Rus­sia, which “blew past “¦ the in­ter­na­tion­al rule of law” with the an­nex­a­tion of Crimea, she said.

“It would be a much worse crisis, in my view, if they had nuc­le­ar weapons,” Got­te­moeller ad­ded. She said it would be “dif­fi­cult to spec­u­late” what the pos­sible out­come might have been in that scen­ario, but sug­ges­ted fur­ther es­cal­a­tion of the con­flict might have been pos­sible.

In re­sponse to con­cerns over nuc­le­ar ex­er­cises Mo­scow ini­ti­ated re­cently, Got­te­moeller noted that Fri­day was Vic­tory Day — an an­nu­al hol­i­day dur­ing which Rus­sia cel­eb­rates the de­feat of the Nazis in World War II.

“This kind of demon­strat­ive activ­ity is not un­usu­al around this time,” Got­te­moeller said. “As far as I was con­cerned, I didn’t find it un­usu­al.”

Got­te­moeller also made an ap­par­ent re­sponse to par­ti­cipants at a U.N. meet­ing in New York last week who ar­gued that the United States and oth­er nuc­le­ar weapons na­tions are not dis­arm­ing fast enough.

“There’s a lot of arm wav­ing that goes on of­ten “¦ among cer­tain parts of the com­munity say­ing, ‘Oh, noth­ing’s been done, noth­ing’s been ac­com­plished,’” Got­te­moeller said while her staff passed out cop­ies of a graph show­ing that the U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons stock­pile — which cur­rently con­sists of 4,804 war­heads — is now more than five times smal­ler than it was dur­ing the Cuban Mis­sile Crisis.

“Is it enough? No, and the pres­id­ent said we want to get to zero,” Got­te­moeller ad­ded. “It’s go­ing to take time; it’s go­ing to take hard work.”

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×