Senators Want New Cost Analysis for Mixed-Oxide Plant In Two Weeks

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks to the media after meeting with members of the intelligence community in 2013. Feinstein asked Obama administration officials on Wednesday to come up soon with options for reducing the cost of constructing a facility to convert bomb-grade plutonium into nuclear fuel.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
May 2, 2014, 4:04 a.m.

Sen­ate ap­pro­pri­at­ors are giv­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion two weeks to come up with a plan for driv­ing down the cost of con­struct­ing a con­tro­ver­sial fa­cil­ity that would con­vert bomb-grade plutoni­um in­to nuc­le­ar fuel.

En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cials es­tim­ate that con­struc­tion of the be­lea­guered South Car­o­lina fa­cil­ity is about 40 per­cent com­plete, and that the gov­ern­ment would have to spend $25.1 bil­lion more over the site’s life­time for it to com­plete its mis­sion.

Al­tern­at­ively, the de­part­ment could po­ten­tially meet the terms of an agree­ment with Rus­sia by simply down-blend­ing plutoni­um left over from the Cold War at a cost of $8.8 bil­lion, ac­cord­ing to a re­port it re­leased earli­er this week.

Un­der the down-blend­ing op­tion — one of sev­er­al the de­part­ment is con­sid­er­ing along with a pos­sible com­ple­tion of the mixed-ox­ide fuel con­ver­sion fa­cil­ity — plutoni­um dis­pos­al could be fin­ished by 2046 and car­ries the least risk of en­coun­ter­ing tech­nic­al hurdles that would cause delays, ac­cord­ing to the re­port.

The MOX fa­cil­ity could com­plete dis­pos­i­tion of the plutoni­um by 2043 at the earli­est and car­ries “sig­ni­fic­ant risk” of be­ing delayed fur­ther, the re­port said.

Mem­bers of Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations En­ergy and Wa­ter De­vel­op­ment Sub­com­mit­tee said on Wed­nes­day they doubted the de­part­ment’s fig­ures, however. They also raised con­cerns with the en­ergy agency’s es­tim­ates that it would take an ad­di­tion­al 18 months to fin­ish study­ing the is­sue and de­cide which op­tion to pur­sue.

“I don’t ac­cept for one minute it’s $25 bil­lion” to con­tin­ue us­ing the MOX op­tion, said Sen­at­or Lind­sey Gra­ham (R-S.C.), who also as­serts the pro­ject is ac­tu­ally 60 per­cent com­plete, rather than 40. “So we’re go­ing to have a con­test over are they right “¦ I’m not go­ing to ac­cept your word on any of this.”

Gra­ham was re­fer­ring to the En­ergy de­part­ment gen­er­ally. Re­tired Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz, who the Sen­ate re­cently con­firmed to lead the semi-autonom­ous Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, test­i­fied at the Wed­nes­day hear­ing for the first time on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s be­half.

Chal­len­ging the de­part­ment’s sug­ges­tion that it would take an ad­di­tion­al 18 months to choose a path for­ward, Sen­at­or Lamar Al­ex­an­der (R-Tenn.) re­it­er­ated his po­s­i­tion that the ad­min­is­tra­tion should as­semble a spe­cial “Red Team” of ex­perts to study the is­sue more quickly.

Al­ex­an­der, the top Re­pub­lic­an on the sub­com­mit­tee, was re­fer­ring to a group of ex­perts that re­cently stud­ied op­tions for mod­ern­iz­ing the na­tion’s meth­od of pro­cessing highly en­riched urani­um for weapons use. He sug­ges­ted such re­views could be fin­ished in as little as 90 days.

Sen­at­or Di­anne Fein­stein (D-Cal­if.), the sub­com­mit­tee chair­wo­man, said she was sym­path­et­ic to the con­cerns of her Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues. She raised wor­ries about stray­ing from an agree­ment with Rus­sia to use the MOX fa­cil­ity as the means of dis­pos­ing the ex­cess plutoni­um. The po­ten­tial change comes at a time when re­la­tions with Mo­scow are gen­er­ally strained, and when the United States is also pur­su­ing con­tro­ver­sial plans to mod­ern­ize its cur­rent nuc­le­ar weapons, the pan­el head noted.

“I’m really con­cerned about break­ing an agree­ment with the Rus­si­ans at this stage and in­creas­ing fund­ing for life-ex­ten­sion pro­grams — not with Ford-type tech­no­logy but Ca­dillac-type tech­no­logy,” Fein­stein said. “I really think it presents a huge di­lemma to this coun­try in terms of keep­ing its word in agree­ments, and par­tic­u­larly with a very power­ful coun­try that is at sixes and sev­ens with us and every­body else.”

Fein­stein has been par­tic­u­larly crit­ic­al of plans to ex­tend the life of aging B-61 nuc­le­ar war­heads sta­tioned in Europe, and has sought to lim­it fund­ing for the pro­ject. 

She said that Klotz has “got to break whatever it is in this de­part­ment that ends up” caus­ing ma­jor pro­jects to run over budget and be­hind sched­ule. The sen­at­or noted that the de­part­ment once es­tim­ated it would cost $1.8 bil­lion to build the MOX fa­cil­ity, and that it now pre­dicts it would cost $8 bil­lion.

Fein­stein ques­tioned the value of put­ting the MOX pro­ject on “cold standby” while the ad­min­is­tra­tion stud­ies al­tern­at­ives, as the de­part­ment has planned to do be­gin­ning in fisc­al 2015.

The chair­wo­man asked that Klotz re­turn to her and Al­ex­an­der with­in the next two weeks with a pro­pos­al on how his agency would “re-look at the MOX num­bers [and sug­gest] po­ten­tial changes that can be made to “¦ keep the price down.”

Ac­cord­ing to Fein­stein, the sub­com­mit­tee needs the in­form­a­tion quickly in or­der for it to in­form the pan­el’s draft­ing of its spend­ing bill for fisc­al 2015.

The new NNSA ad­min­is­trat­or agreed to Fein­stein’s re­quest.

“We’ll come see you in two weeks,” Klotz said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×