Pantex Nuclear-Weapons Contractor Warned Over Safety Hazards

Global Security Newswire Staff
April 25, 2014, 9:44 a.m.

The con­tract­or that man­ages a Texas nuc­le­ar-weapons fa­cil­ity has re­ceived a gov­ern­ment warn­ing over mul­tiple re­cent in­cid­ents that posed safety haz­ards.

In an April 17 let­ter to the pres­id­ent of B&W Pan­tex, the U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment lis­ted six safety in­cid­ents that oc­curred since Au­gust 2012 at the atom­ic-arms as­sembly and dis­as­sembly plant north­east of Am­arillo, the Am­arillo Globe-News re­por­ted on Thursday.

John Boulden, head of en­force­ment and over­sight for the de­part­ment’s Of­fice of Health, Safety and Se­cur­ity, said the “events are sig­ni­fic­ant in that they in­volved im­prop­er man­age­ment, hand­ling or la­beling of highly haz­ard­ous ma­ter­i­als, in­clud­ing ex­plos­ives, which have the po­ten­tial to cause ser­i­ous in­jury or death.”

The in­cid­ents in­clude a Ju­ly 2012 oc­cur­rence in which power­ful blast ex­plos­ives and a det­on­at­ing cord were found in a [weapons] bay that was not cleared to store such sens­it­ive sub­stances. In a March 2013 in­cid­ent, plant work­ers wrap­ping up two items filled with spe­cial atom­ic sub­stances put the wrong identi­fy­ing codes on their con­tain­ers, which could have res­ul­ted in the ma­ter­i­als be­ing handled in a way in­con­sist­ent with the safety risks they posed, ac­cord­ing to Boulden.

His of­fice de­cided not to levy any fin­an­cial pen­al­ties against B&W Pan­tex, but told the con­tract­or it would be watch­ing to en­sure that sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­als are ap­pro­pri­ately iden­ti­fied and handled. B&W Pan­tex has not re­ceived any fines for work­place safety con­cerns since it began man­aging the Texas weapons fa­cil­ity in 2001.

The con­glom­er­ate that makes up B&W Pan­tex in­cludes Bechtel and Bab­cock & Wil­cox. That man­age­ment part­ner­ship will soon end. The En­ergy De­part­ment has awar­ded the con­tract to man­age the Pan­tex plant — as well as the Y-12 weapons site in Ten­ness­ee — to Con­sol­id­ated Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity, a con­sor­ti­um that in­cludes Bechtel Na­tion­al and Lock­heed Mar­tin.

B&W Pan­tex of­fi­cials de­clined to com­ment on the safety vi­ol­a­tions.

What We're Following See More »
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
14 minutes ago

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
31 minutes ago
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
2 hours ago

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"