The contractor that manages a Texas nuclear-weapons facility has received a government warning over multiple recent incidents that posed safety hazards.
In an April 17 letter to the president of B&W Pantex, the U.S. Energy Department listed six safety incidents that occurred since August 2012 at the atomic-arms assembly and disassembly plant northeast of Amarillo, the Amarillo Globe-News reported on Thursday.
John Boulden, head of enforcement and oversight for the department’s Office of Health, Safety and Security, said the “events are significant in that they involved improper management, handling or labeling of highly hazardous materials, including explosives, which have the potential to cause serious injury or death.”
The incidents include a July 2012 occurrence in which powerful blast explosives and a detonating cord were found in a [weapons] bay that was not cleared to store such sensitive substances. In a March 2013 incident, plant workers wrapping up two items filled with special atomic substances put the wrong identifying codes on their containers, which could have resulted in the materials being handled in a way inconsistent with the safety risks they posed, according to Boulden.
His office decided not to levy any financial penalties against B&W Pantex, but told the contractor it would be watching to ensure that sensitive materials are appropriately identified and handled. B&W Pantex has not received any fines for workplace safety concerns since it began managing the Texas weapons facility in 2001.
The conglomerate that makes up B&W Pantex includes Bechtel and Babcock & Wilcox. That management partnership will soon end. The Energy Department has awarded the contract to manage the Pantex plant — as well as the Y-12 weapons site in Tennessee — to Consolidated Nuclear Security, a consortium that includes Bechtel National and Lockheed Martin.
B&W Pantex officials declined to comment on the safety violations.
What We're Following See More »
"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.
"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"