A Pass-Fail Exam Is All That Stands Between Air Force Officers and Nuclear Missile Codes

The change comes in the wake of a high-profile cheating scandal that revealed a de facto expectation that perfect test scores were needed for advancement.

National Journal
Rachel Oswald
April 23, 2014, 9:19 a.m.

The Air Force is sim­pli­fy­ing the way it grades nuc­le­ar-mis­sile of­ficers on their monthly ex­ams, the ser­vice’s top-rank­ing of­ficer said on Wed­nes­day.

The ser­vice has “made the monthly [cer­ti­fic­a­tion] test pass-fail,” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said at a Wash­ing­ton event. His re­marks come in the wake of a high-pro­file cheat­ing scan­dal at a Montana base that re­vealed a de facto ex­pect­a­tion that per­fect test scores were needed for ad­vance­ment up the ranks.

Welsh did not say in his re­marks at the Na­tion­al Press Club what per­cent­age of cor­rect an­swers would be needed to pass the thumbs-up-or-down pro­fi­ciency tests. It was pre­vi­ously re­por­ted that launch-con­trol of­ficers needed a score of at least 90 per­cent on each ex­am to main­tain au­thor­iz­a­tion to key in a fir­ing code for one of the coun­try’s 450 ground-based stra­tegic mis­siles.

An Air Force in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to drug-use al­leg­a­tions un­covered cheat­ing on cer­ti­fic­a­tion tests at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont., and res­ul­ted in the ser­vice earli­er this year fir­ing nine mid-level of­ficers at the base for their fail­ure to de­tect and re­port the mis­con­duct. Welsh said the wrong­do­ing in­volved about 40 per­cent of each of the 341st Mis­sile Wing’s three squad­rons.

The mis­sile wing main­tains and op­er­ates 150 Minute­man 3 in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­siles. Air Force bases in Wyom­ing and North Dakota each host an equi­val­ent num­ber of the nuc­le­ar-armed mis­siles.

Ser­vice brass have at­trib­uted the cheat­ing at Malmstrom to a “cul­ture of per­fec­tion” that led mis­sileers to be­lieve their ca­reers would suf­fer if they did not get test scores of 100 per­cent. Though of­fi­cials said they did not un­cov­er any test-tak­ing mis­con­duct at bases in North Dakota and Wyom­ing, ex-mis­sile launch of­ficers have said cheat­ing has been rampant for years throughout the ICBM of­ficer corps.

“The people who cheated, the people who were break­ing the law, who were break­ing our rules and policies in­ten­tion­ally, they don’t have a fu­ture with us. That’s not how we op­er­ate,” Welsh said.

He said the ser­vice is work­ing to quickly im­ple­ment qual­ity-of-life changes for nuc­le­ar-mis­sile per­son­nel that were sug­ges­ted in a re­cent grass­roots sur­vey. Some of those fixes in­volve em­power­ing lower-level of­ficers to make more de­cisions.

“We’re try­ing hard to elim­in­ate an idea that you can nev­er make a de­cision, [that] your most-seni­or boss al­ways has to be the one mak­ing the call,” the four-star gen­er­al said. “There are a lot of things that we need to be do­ing in that busi­ness at the low­est level of au­thor­ity.”

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×