The Pentagon on Monday criticized a Russian jet’s repeated buzzing of a U.S. antimissile ship sailing in international waters in the Black Sea.
The action happened on Sunday and involved a nuclear-capable — but unarmed — Su-24 fighter aircraft that made a total of 12 flying passes close to the Aegis-equipped USS Donald Cook while it conducted patrol operations in the western Black Sea, the Defense Department told reporters.
“The aircraft did not respond to multiple queries and warnings from Donald Cook, and the event ended without incident after approximately 90 minutes,” department spokesman Army Col. Steve Warren was quoted as saying in a Pentagon press story. “This provocative and unprofessional Russian action is inconsistent with international protocols and previous agreements on the professional interaction between our militaries.”
A second Su-24 accompanied the first Russian fighter jet but did not make any passes, Warren said.
The U.S. missile destroyer was redeployed to the Black Sea in recent days in accordance with the Pentagon’s efforts to assure NATO members and other countries of a U.S. commitment to their security. The ship’s deployment comes amid continuing tensions with Russia over Moscow’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula and suspected involvement in insurgent actions in the eastern part of the country.
The USS Donald Cook is home-ported in Rota, Spain, and is the first of four Aegis ships slated for deployment in the Mediterranean as part of the U.S. contribution to NATO missile defense.
“The Donald Cook is more than capable of defending itself against two Su-24s,” Warren said.
The Russian defense ministry last week spoke out against the deployment of the warship to the Black Sea, saying it demonstrated that U.S. antimissile systems in Europe are aimed at undermining Russia’s nuclear deterrent.
Warren suggested the Su-24 pilots were acting with some form of approval from the Russian military. “I would have difficulty believing that two Russian pilots, on their own, would choose to take such an action,” the spokesman said.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.