Feinstein Criticizes Extending Timetable for Nuclear-Security Projects

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks in January on Capitol Hill. On Wednesday, the senior lawmaker criticized the Energy Department's plan to extend the schedule for completing work on multiple nuclear-security projects.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
April 11, 2014, 9:38 a.m.

A seni­or U.S. sen­at­or on Wed­nes­day cri­ti­cized the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion for ex­tend­ing the mile­stone sched­ule on a num­ber of nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity pro­jects.

Speak­ing at a Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations En­ergy and Wa­ter De­vel­op­ment Sub­com­mit­tee hear­ing, Sen­at­or Di­anne Fein­stein (D-Cal­if.) singled out En­ergy De­part­ment plans for re­mov­ing weapons-us­able urani­um from roughly 200 glob­al nuc­le­ar re­act­ors and for se­cur­ing sens­it­ive ra­di­olo­gic­al ma­ter­i­als held at ci­vil­ian U.S. fa­cil­it­ies.

Fein­stein said the de­part­ment’s fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al would push back by five years, to 2035, the tar­get date for wrap­ping up work on the world­wide re­act­or-con­ver­sion pro­ject.

“This simply is un­ac­cept­able at the same time we’re pour­ing money in­to the mod­ern­iz­a­tion of cer­tain war­heads. It’s just un­ac­cept­able,” Fein­stein said.

As part of the Glob­al Threat Re­duc­tion Ini­ti­at­ive, the pro­ject aims to con­vert re­act­ors and iso­tope-pro­duc­tion fa­cil­it­ies that use highly en­riched urani­um to run in­stead on low-en­riched ma­ter­i­al, or shut them down al­to­geth­er. Once the re­act­ors no longer have use for the HEU ma­ter­i­al, it can be re­moved and per­man­ently dis­posed of un­der a sep­ar­ate GTRI pro­gram.

The En­ergy De­part­ment has taken some cri­ti­cism from anti-nuc­le­ar ad­voc­ates for its budget pro­pos­al, which would re­duce by al­most 18 per­cent spend­ing on non­pro­lif­er­a­tion activ­it­ies while sim­ul­tan­eously in­creas­ing fund­ing for nuc­le­ar arms by close to 7 per­cent.

In an ex­change with En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz, who was testi­fy­ing be­fore the ap­pro­pri­ations sub­com­mit­tee, Fein­stein noted that his de­part­ment also was delay­ing the com­ple­tion of a GTRI pro­ject to in­stall se­cur­ity up­grades at U.S. non­mil­it­ary sites hous­ing se­lec­ted ra­di­olo­gic­al and nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als.

The pro­ject funds se­cur­ity up­grades for ci­vil­ian sites that con­tain these sens­it­ive ra­di­olo­gic­al sources used for re­search, med­ic­al and com­mer­cial pur­poses. As of the end of fisc­al 2013, the ini­ti­at­ive had in­stalled se­cur­ity en­hance­ments at 1,674 sites, ac­cord­ing to the En­ergy De­part­ment’s budget pro­pos­al.

The nuc­le­ar-se­cur­ity ef­fort was es­tab­lished to ad­dress con­cerns that ci­vil­ian sites could be vul­ner­able to the theft of weapons-us­able ra­di­olo­gic­al sources, which could later be used to build a so-called “dirty bomb.” Such an im­pro­vised device might use con­ven­tion­al ex­plos­ives to dis­perse ra­dio­act­ive con­tam­in­ants across a wide area.

The de­part­ment’s budget re­quest said that “the pre­vi­ous [pro­ject] end date of 2044 is now TBD pending a re­view” of the scope and fin­an­cial re­quire­ments.

“Has there been a change in threat as­sess­ment that I’m not aware of?” Fein­stein asked. “Are ter­ror­ists no longer in­ter­ested in ac­quir­ing nuc­le­ar or ra­di­olo­gic­al bombs for im­pro­vised nuc­le­ar devices and dirty bombs? I don’t un­der­stand how you can de­fend this budget on non­pro­lif­er­a­tion cuts.”

Mon­iz ac­know­ledged that “things like the GTRI pro­gram … they do have re­duc­tions.” But he ad­ded that a “very con­strained” budget en­vir­on­ment ne­ces­sit­ated “some tough choices.”

The En­ergy sec­ret­ary de­fen­ded the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s over­all pro­gress in ef­forts to se­cure nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als world­wide.

“There’s been a surge, really, over the last four years with 12 coun­tries, all HEU [highly en­riched urani­um] re­moved from them, in­clud­ing I think three in the last year, year-and-a-half,” Mon­iz said.

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×