Republicans Want to Fire Someone to Stop Preventable Veteran Deaths

But VA officials warn against widespread punishment for what they see as a limited problem.

National Journal
Jordain Carney
April 9, 2014, 1:26 p.m.

Army vet­er­an Barry Coates went to a clin­ic run by the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment in Novem­ber 2010 suf­fer­ing from severe ab­dom­in­al pain. He said that more than a year later, after mul­tiple re­quests for a colono­scopy, he fi­nally re­ceived the pro­ced­ure — only to dis­cov­er he had stage-four can­cer.

Coates, who is ter­min­ally ill, test­i­fied be­fore the House Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee on Wed­nes­day as part of a look by law­makers in­to the rash of pre­vent­able deaths at VA clin­ics and hos­pit­als. The most re­cent re­port, re­leased earli­er this week, linked 23 vet­er­ans’ deaths to delays in can­cer treat­ment. Chair­man Jeff Miller and oth­er com­mit­tee mem­bers said that num­ber could be closer to 40.

And Miller and oth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans made clear Wed­nes­day that at least one thing must be done im­me­di­ately: Someone should be fired.

Miller’s le­gis­la­tion would make the pro­cess for fir­ing high-rank­ing civil ser­vants largely the same as fir­ing con­gres­sion­al staffers — who are con­sidered at-will em­ploy­ees. That would mean tak­ing away the no­ti­fic­a­tion and abil­ity to ap­peal dis­cip­lin­ary de­cisions cur­rently offered.

Re­pub­lic­ans lamen­ted that, to their know­ledge, no one tied to vet­er­an deaths had been ter­min­ated, and that em­ploy­ees must be held ac­count­able.

But while every Demo­crat­ic mem­ber ac­know­ledged that something must be done to de­term­ine how to pre­vent these deaths, they stopped short of back­ing the le­gis­la­tion.

“It is in­cum­bent upon all of us here to make sure the VA is ac­count­able,” said Cali­for­nia Demo­crat Ju­lia Brown­ley, who hasn’t yet thrown her sup­port be­hind the le­gis­la­tion. And Rep. Raul Ruiz, also from Cali­for­nia, re­com­men­ded that com­mit­tee mem­bers com­mis­sion a study to com­pare pre­vent­able deaths and cases of neg­li­gence with­in the VA to rates with­in top private hos­pit­als.

The VA is push­ing back on the le­gis­la­tion as well. VA Sec­ret­ary Eric Shin­seki told law­makers last week that he has the tools he needs to make sure VA per­son­nel are ad­equately do­ing their jobs.

And Thomas Lynch, as­sist­ant deputy un­der­sec­ret­ary for health for clin­ic­al op­er­a­tions at the Vet­er­ans Health Ad­min­is­tra­tion, echoed those com­ments, say­ing: “I un­der­stand your con­cern “¦ re­gard­ing ac­count­ab­il­ity.”¦ I’m troubled a little bit about wheth­er or not fir­ing some­body is ne­ces­sar­ily the an­swer.”

But the com­mit­tee’s Re­pub­lic­ans did not budge.

In­di­ana Re­pub­lic­an Jack­ie Wal­or­ski, whose fath­er died of colon can­cer, broke in­to tears while ques­tion­ing Coates. She called the VA “a bur­eau­crat­ic sys­tem that is broken.”

And the com­mit­tee mem­bers have a power­ful ally in their quest to help the VA clean house. House Speak­er John Boehner told re­port­ers earli­er this month that “the sec­ret­ary needs to have more au­thor­ity to man­age his own de­part­ment. It’s as simple as that,” adding that he be­lieves the VA is fail­ing vet­er­ans and their fam­il­ies.

And though Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats on the com­mit­tee have not come to­geth­er on VA fir­ings, they all agreed on one thing: The VA needs to be more forth­com­ing with Con­gress.

Miller said that the com­mit­tee has been wait­ing for months on in­form­a­tion about vet­er­ans’ deaths that are tied to VA care, and sev­er­al mem­bers said that when prob­lems at the VA arise, law­makers are giv­en calm and gen­er­al re­sponses versus spe­cif­ic ways the de­part­ment is mov­ing for­ward.

“It’s just my feel­ing and my only con­clu­sion that I can come to “¦ is that there is something that you don’t want the pub­lic to hear,” Brown­ley said.

What We're Following See More »
WORDS AND PICTURES
White House Looks Back on bin Laden Mission
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NO BATTLE OVER SEATTLE
SCOTUS Won’t Hear Appeal of Minimum-Wage Law
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a sweeping constitutional challenge to Seattle’s minimum wage law, in what could have been a test case for future legal attacks on similar measures across the country. In a one-line order, the justices declined to hear a case by the International Franchise Association and a group of Seattle franchisees, which had said in court papers that the city’s gradual wage increase to $15 discriminates against them in a way that violates the Constitution’s commerce clause."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN JUNE
DC to Release Draft Constitution as Part of Statehood Push
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The New Columbia Statehood Commission—composed of five District leaders including Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, and D.C.'s congressional delegation—voted today to publicly release a draft of a new constitution for an eventual state next Friday, at the Lincoln Cottage." It's the first step in a statehood push this year that will include a constitutional convention in June and a referendum in November.

Source:
ALZHEIMER’S OUTCRY
Will Ferrell Bails on Reagan Movie
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Amid outcry by President Reagan's children, actor Will Ferrell has pulled out of a movie that makes light of Reagan's Alzheimer's disease. A spokesperson for Ferrell said, “The ‘Reagan’ script is one of a number of scripts that had been submitted to Will Ferrell which he had considered. While it is by no means an ‘Alzheimer’s comedy’ as has been suggested, Mr. Ferrell is not pursuing this project."

Source:
×