House Republicans moved their battle over the Obama administration’s handling of Russia to a new front, but their endgame remains the same: forcing the Pentagon to revise its strategy.
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon unveiled legislation Tuesday afternoon that aims to boost United States military’s posture and capabilities in Europe to counter “Russian aggression towards Ukraine and NATO allies,” according to the committee.
The bill, backed by Republican Reps. Mike Turner and Mike Rogers, calls for the United States to suspend military activity with Russia until it is no longer occupying Crimea and in compliance with a pair of treaties. It also calls for the United States to provide military advice and technical assistance to the Ukraine.
The push is the latest move in a tug-of-war between House lawmakers and the Pentagon over the U.S.-Russia relationship.
McKeon introduced a resolution last month that calls for the United States to maintain its military presence in Europe. It also calls for using a NATO summit later this year to boost engagement with countries — some of which belonged to the Soviet Union — that want to join the organization.
And Republicans have criticized the Quadrennial Defense Review, a recently released strategy document from the Defense Department, for, among other things, scarcely mentioning Russia.
But Derek Chollet, the assistant secretary of Defense for international security affairs, told lawmakers Tuesday that “we’re not planning to rewrite the QDR.”
Christine Wormuth, a top Pentagon official, told lawmakers last week that the department would have “added some additional sentences” to the review if Crimea’s annexation had happened before the document was released.
“That’s hardly a reexamination of the nation’s policy toward Moscow,” McKeon said.
A committee staffer said the California Republican will use the House’s National Defense Authorization Act to require the Pentagon to resubmit the strategy review.
And though Chollet said Russia’s actions — and any further steps — will cause the United States to reexamine troop levels in Europe, he defended the analysis, saying: “I think fundamentally the strategy subscribed in the QDR is correct.”
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.