House Republicans Push for Stronger Strategy on Russia

Lawmakers want to suspend military involvement until Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel determines that Putin’s troops are no longer in Crimea.

An armed man, believed to be Russian serviceman, patrols outside an Ukrainian military base in Perevalnoye on March 17, 2014. The United States and Europe aimed sanctions directly at Vladmir Putin's inner circle Monday to punish Russia's move to annex Crimea, deepening the worst East-West rift since the Cold War. The move came hours after the Ukrainian regime voted to join Russia in a referendum the West deems illegitimate and as Crimea embarked on the next political steps to embrace Kremlin rule. 
National Journal
Jordain Carney
April 8, 2014, 9:13 a.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans moved their battle over the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand­ling of Rus­sia to a new front, but their en­dgame re­mains the same: for­cing the Pentagon to re­vise its strategy.

House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Buck McK­eon un­veiled le­gis­la­tion Tues­day af­ter­noon that aims to boost United States mil­it­ary’s pos­ture and cap­ab­il­it­ies in Europe to counter “Rus­si­an ag­gres­sion to­wards Ukraine and NATO al­lies,” ac­cord­ing to the com­mit­tee. 

The bill, backed by Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Mike Turn­er and Mike Ro­gers, calls for the United States to sus­pend mil­it­ary activ­ity with Rus­sia un­til it is no longer oc­cupy­ing Crimea and in com­pli­ance with a pair of treat­ies. It also calls for the United States to provide mil­it­ary ad­vice and tech­nic­al as­sist­ance to the Ukraine.

The push is the latest move in a tug-of-war between House law­makers and the Pentagon over the U.S.-Rus­sia re­la­tion­ship.

McK­eon in­tro­duced a res­ol­u­tion last month that calls for the United States to main­tain its mil­it­ary pres­ence in Europe. It also calls for us­ing a NATO sum­mit later this year to boost en­gage­ment with coun­tries — some of which be­longed to the So­viet Uni­on — that want to join the or­gan­iz­a­tion.

And Re­pub­lic­ans have cri­ti­cized the Quad­ren­ni­al De­fense Re­view, a re­cently re­leased strategy doc­u­ment from the De­fense De­part­ment, for, among oth­er things, scarcely men­tion­ing Rus­sia.

But Derek Chol­let, the as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of De­fense for in­ter­na­tion­al se­cur­ity af­fairs, told law­makers Tues­day that “we’re not plan­ning to re­write the QDR.”

Christine Wor­muth, a top Pentagon of­fi­cial, told law­makers last week that the de­part­ment would have “ad­ded some ad­di­tion­al sen­tences” to the re­view if Crimea’s an­nex­a­tion had happened be­fore the doc­u­ment was re­leased.

“That’s hardly a reex­am­in­a­tion of the na­tion’s policy to­ward Mo­scow,” McK­eon said.

A com­mit­tee staffer said the Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an will use the House’s Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act to re­quire the Pentagon to re­sub­mit the strategy re­view.

And though Chol­let said Rus­sia’s ac­tions — and any fur­ther steps — will cause the United States to reex­am­ine troop levels in Europe, he de­fen­ded the ana­lys­is, say­ing: “I think fun­da­ment­ally the strategy sub­scribed in the QDR is cor­rect.”

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×